Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
elemental designs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mandos" data-source="post: 2969623" data-attributes="member: 561347"><p>Alright, so based on subs with a COMPARATIVE xmax...hell, these subs have LESS xmax than the 13Kv.2 that you posted and less cone area to boot:</p><p></p><p>RE RE 12:</p><p></p><p>480 cm² Sd</p><p></p><p>12mm xmax</p><p></p><p>JL Audio 12W3V3:</p><p></p><p>520 cm² Sd</p><p></p><p>13 mm xmax</p><p></p><p>13Kv.2:</p><p></p><p>545cm² Sd</p><p></p><p>15.1 mm xmax</p><p></p><p>So, the 13Kv.2 has more cone area than those two subs with a more conventional surround while offering more xmax.</p><p></p><p>For the subs you show that have the VERY tall surrounds:</p><p></p><p>Image Dynamics IDMAX:</p><p></p><p>545 cm² Sd</p><p></p><p>24.6 mm xmax</p><p></p><p>TC Sounds TC-3000:</p><p></p><p>452 cm² Sd(their site lists 240mm diameter = 12 cm radius^2 * PI for that #)</p><p></p><p>30 mm xmax</p><p></p><p>I'd certainly hope the drivers that are going to move 9.5+ mm farther one way will have a taller surround.</p><p></p><p>The IDMAX driver has the same cone area, and more xmax, and it has a much taller surround. That TC driver has less cone area and more xmax.</p><p></p><p>Granted, it might not quite have the same cone area as what a 13" driver with a conventional cone would be, but it's definitely got more than a conventional 12" driver with an equal xmax.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mandos, post: 2969623, member: 561347"] Alright, so based on subs with a COMPARATIVE xmax...hell, these subs have LESS xmax than the 13Kv.2 that you posted and less cone area to boot: RE RE 12: 480 cm² Sd 12mm xmax JL Audio 12W3V3: 520 cm² Sd 13 mm xmax 13Kv.2: 545cm² Sd 15.1 mm xmax So, the 13Kv.2 has more cone area than those two subs with a more conventional surround while offering more xmax. For the subs you show that have the VERY tall surrounds: Image Dynamics IDMAX: 545 cm² Sd 24.6 mm xmax TC Sounds TC-3000: 452 cm² Sd(their site lists 240mm diameter = 12 cm radius^2 * PI for that #) 30 mm xmax I'd certainly hope the drivers that are going to move 9.5+ mm farther one way will have a taller surround. The IDMAX driver has the same cone area, and more xmax, and it has a much taller surround. That TC driver has less cone area and more xmax. Granted, it might not quite have the same cone area as what a 13" driver with a conventional cone would be, but it's definitely got more than a conventional 12" driver with an equal xmax. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
elemental designs
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list