Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Elemental Designs 13Av.2 Subwoofer ??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NDMstang65" data-source="post: 6018347" data-attributes="member: 544576"><p>//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif ruh roh raggy.</p><p></p><p>We shall continue to play the game of "X" motor topology with really short coil rated at 3 times as much power as any normal person would rate it at..and then wonder why 80% of them break...but by god it has low inductance and it'l play out to 300Hz flat (which is still VERY narrow bandwidth all things considered)..minus that little dip in response at the say sub 30Hz range because it runs out of excursion because the coil is short...</p><p></p><p>When will people learn that you need to focus on a solid 3 way setup...you shouldn't have to worry about inductance with anything that is honestly 'sq' related...as a sub never ever EVER plays anything above 50Hz in a SQ car that is worth its salt when being judged...</p><p></p><p>Inductance in and of itself should be more closely examined in a mid-woofer/midrange/tweet alignment...which is where "X" topology would be more at home imo.</p><p></p><p>:shakes head....walks away:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NDMstang65, post: 6018347, member: 544576"] [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] ruh roh raggy. We shall continue to play the game of "X" motor topology with really short coil rated at 3 times as much power as any normal person would rate it at..and then wonder why 80% of them break...but by god it has low inductance and it'l play out to 300Hz flat (which is still VERY narrow bandwidth all things considered)..minus that little dip in response at the say sub 30Hz range because it runs out of excursion because the coil is short... When will people learn that you need to focus on a solid 3 way setup...you shouldn't have to worry about inductance with anything that is honestly 'sq' related...as a sub never ever EVER plays anything above 50Hz in a SQ car that is worth its salt when being judged... Inductance in and of itself should be more closely examined in a mid-woofer/midrange/tweet alignment...which is where "X" topology would be more at home imo. :shakes head....walks away: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Elemental Designs 13Av.2 Subwoofer ??
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh