Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Steven Kephart" data-source="post: 243582" data-attributes="member: 548397">The woven tinsel leads is actually a bad thing.&nbsp; It causes wear spots on the spider that reduces the subs life.&nbsp;The Brahma&#039;s don&#039;t have a tinsel lead slap problem anymore.&nbsp; My B10 sit&#039;s only a couple feet away from my head under my dash inverse mounted.&nbsp; If anyone would be able to hear lead slap, it would be me with my setup.So, what performance differences does the ED A have over the EVO-R?&nbsp; In fact the EVO-R used a progressive spider rather than dual linear spiders.&nbsp; This means their Kms curve is better than the A.&nbsp;I explained this in my other post.&nbsp; The cone hits the spider platform on this type of basket design in 31mm.&nbsp; Their tier puts it up 9mm.&nbsp; 31-9 is 22mm.&nbsp; I got this information directly from Dan Wiggins, who was playing with a 12A.&nbsp; He said it physically can&#039;t move backward more than 22mm.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Steven Kephart, post: 243582, member: 548397"] The woven tinsel leads is actually a bad thing. It causes wear spots on the spider that reduces the subs life. The Brahma's don't have a tinsel lead slap problem anymore. My B10 sit's only a couple feet away from my head under my dash inverse mounted. If anyone would be able to hear lead slap, it would be me with my setup. So, what performance differences does the ED A have over the EVO-R? In fact the EVO-R used a progressive spider rather than dual linear spiders. This means their Kms curve is better than the A. I explained this in my other post. The cone hits the spider platform on this type of basket design in 31mm. Their tier puts it up 9mm. 31-9 is 22mm. I got this information directly from Dan Wiggins, who was playing with a 12A. He said it physically can't move backward more than 22mm. [/QUOTE]

Verification