Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Eclipse ti's have less cone area?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ciaonzo" data-source="post: 7637344" data-attributes="member: 607015"><p>Ummmm, yeah.... If you can see the surround moving, then it's moving air. Is it not?</p><p></p><p>Generally speaking, you may include half of the surround width as radiating surface. But even including half of that Eclipse surround ends up being a bit less Sd than some other drivers of the same diameter, which is where the other part you've mentioned comes into play. The driver has the stroke to make up for slightly less surface area.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ciaonzo, post: 7637344, member: 607015"] Ummmm, yeah.... If you can see the surround moving, then it's moving air. Is it not? Generally speaking, you may include half of the surround width as radiating surface. But even including half of that Eclipse surround ends up being a bit less Sd than some other drivers of the same diameter, which is where the other part you've mentioned comes into play. The driver has the stroke to make up for slightly less surface area. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Eclipse ti's have less cone area?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
