Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Eclipse ti's have less cone area?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wenn_du_weinst" data-source="post: 7637332" data-attributes="member: 576676"><p>yes</p><p></p><p>there is more to cone area then the actual cone. Even if it was only the actual metal cone that displaced air, the travel of the cone would make up for it. That isn't the case though, Don't listen to tc sounds gibberish about their surrounds increasing cone area that's bullshit. On a half roll right around 1/2 the surround is included in the ''cone area''</p><p></p><p>now just to touch on the flat cone vs traditional; just because a cone is flat or has less actual surface area, does not mean it displaces less air. The actual piston is a radiating layer of air that is flat anyway. there is usually a dead layer of air on each side of the cone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wenn_du_weinst, post: 7637332, member: 576676"] yes there is more to cone area then the actual cone. Even if it was only the actual metal cone that displaced air, the travel of the cone would make up for it. That isn't the case though, Don't listen to tc sounds gibberish about their surrounds increasing cone area that's bullshit. On a half roll right around 1/2 the surround is included in the ''cone area'' now just to touch on the flat cone vs traditional; just because a cone is flat or has less actual surface area, does not mean it displaces less air. The actual piston is a radiating layer of air that is flat anyway. there is usually a dead layer of air on each side of the cone. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Eclipse ti's have less cone area?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list