bigbassman
Premium Member
Master of all things loud
why would the 3500 be better for lower power? will it "run" better? hell no.. its a woofer, they all do the same thing. the 9515 will be just as loud as the 3515 with 50 watts.. 500 watts, and 1000 watts, IDENTICAL!!!! The 9515 will start to pull away with power amount over 1000 watts.. due to LESS POWER COMPRESSION, thanks to the longer coil (i.e. more heat dispersion). You're completely incorrect saying that the 3515 would be a better choice due to performance. However, price would be an issue, but you did not mention that.Originally posted by jtmoney
. if u plan to run 400-500rms on a dd9500 then why dont u get a 3500 series instead which will be better for the power demands mentioned. the sub should run atits optimum, ie. no point underrunning
wanna know how big a difference 300 watts is? (bd 1500's bench in the 1650-1700 watt range) bout .3db.. that enough reason to buy a new amp? not for this bassmonkey.. you can find .3db other places.point 2 - from what i gather, Ricky Nichols does plan to use it fore SPL purposes, in which case, as i said before, lots of power, around 2000RMS per 9500 is a good number, not too much & not too little. and another thing, if u put a big amp up a sub, then u can turn the gain right down, u will have less distortion up to a certain point and the curent draw will be less too.
thank you.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/nono.gif.eca61d170185779e0921b0faa9704973.gif
BTW... you do NOT want to turn a gain down a lot in SPL... distorted signals have a higher power potential, therefore.. they are beneficial to SPL installs. There is a limit to this of course.. you cannot fully clip an amp and expect a gain.. since you are robbing the cone of stroke...
thank YOU //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/nono.gif.eca61d170185779e0921b0faa9704973.gif
Loyd L.
