Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Dayton Subs: Titanic vs. Reference HF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Immacomputer" data-source="post: 3478738" data-attributes="member: 570419"><p>Those are terrible terms that I don't like to use to discuss drivers. Both drivers were very clean sounding and it would have been difficult to distinguish on from another when listening to music at the same level. The HF did have a noticeably better high-bass extension and the Titanic was a little louder all around (minus sub 35hz stuff as the HF was ported and could dig deeper there). If both subs were sealed, I would say the Titanic would have a noticeable edge in output but both drivers would sound very similar. And no, you wouldn't be loosing any musical accuracy going from the HF to the Titanic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Immacomputer, post: 3478738, member: 570419"] Those are terrible terms that I don't like to use to discuss drivers. Both drivers were very clean sounding and it would have been difficult to distinguish on from another when listening to music at the same level. The HF did have a noticeably better high-bass extension and the Titanic was a little louder all around (minus sub 35hz stuff as the HF was ported and could dig deeper there). If both subs were sealed, I would say the Titanic would have a noticeable edge in output but both drivers would sound very similar. And no, you wouldn't be loosing any musical accuracy going from the HF to the Titanic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Dayton Subs: Titanic vs. Reference HF
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list