Current events discussion

Yeah I read that too. You still playing it off like you already knew that? So now we have transitioned from you proving Trump was not shot to you claiming a 5.56 and a .223 are the same round. You can claim they are the same round until your hearts content. I don't care if you love being wrong just to argue. Trump was shot in the ear by a 5.56 bullet. **** it up buttercup.
Yep. It was in an article in in Shooting Times a few months ago.
They also covered pistol ammo similarities. If you want to subscribe, the cover of their magazines looks like this:
IMG_5319.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Here you go dummy. Oh, 3:00 would be a good start for you in the video. While you are watching the video and being schooled you can shove that middle finger right up your *** all the way past that cheap $75 Invicta Pro Diver.


You want me to watch a video that repeats the info that I already told you, and that Slapper also confirmed?
Go read your May 2024 issue of Shooting Times, and get back to me on it.

The Invicta was probably closer to $60, is 10+ years old, and has a Seiko NH35 movement that is accurate to about 3 minutes a month. Not a bad deal at all. Would you like to see my Baume, or my Omega, Longines, classic Casios, Timexes, Wittnauer, and other watches?

1736222765092.png
1736223149992.png


So: Identical for all intents and purposes and interoperable, but it can be deadly to do so.

That sounds an awful lot like when I said "A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223"

Maybe you should consider these subscriptions, too. Don't be so afraid of learning.
IMG_5320.jpeg
 
Last edited:
You want me to watch a video that repeats the info that I already told you, and that Slapper also confirmed?
Go read your May 2024 issue of Shooting Times, and get back to me on it.

The Invicta was probably closer to $60, is 10+ years old, and has a Seiko NH35 movement that is accurate to about 3 minutes a month. Not a bad deal at all. Would you like to see my Baume, or my Omega, Longines, classic Casios, Timexes, Wittnauer, and other watches?

View attachment 62439View attachment 62440

So: Identical for all intents and purposes and interoperable, but it can be deadly to do so.

That sounds an awful lot like when I said "A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223"

Maybe you should consider these subscriptions, too. Don't be so afraid of learning.
View attachment 62441
At 3:00 he tells you they are similar BUT are NOT the same and explains why. Any other argument you have is now irrelevant to me. I know they are different, have known for many years. You can blow smoke up your own *** and no, I do not care to see any of your knock off watch clones that you bought on Temu.
 
I don't know why or how the **** it is so hard for a person to understand that they are TWO DIFFERENT ammo's that can be fired from one rifle but should not be fired from the other. If they were the ******* same you could fire either of them from either rifle. I am done with this asinine back and forth about the different bullets.
 
I don't know why or how the **** it is so hard for a person to understand that they are TWO DIFFERENT ammo's that can be fired from one rifle but should not be fired from the other. If they were the ******* same you could fire either of them from either rifle. I am done with this asinine back and forth about the different bullets.
It's hard for you to understand simply because you are not very bright.

To repeat myself yet again (underline for emphasis): "A 5.56 is the same a .223, run at higher pressure. So it would cause MORE damage, with other circumstances being the same. You can shoot .223 in a rifle chambered for 5.56, but it's a BAD idea to shoot the 5.56 in a rifle chambered for .223"

Let me ask you this: Which bullet makes a bigger hole passing through paper at 3,000 FPS: One with a diameter of .223", or one with a diameter of .223"?
 
Listen, I am off to bed but I will humor you and give you something to ponder.

Should you shoot a 5.56 through a rifle chambered for .223? The answer is no because the pressure difference can be dangerous. So what do you need? You need a DIFFERENT cartridge. You would need a .223 to safely shoot that rifle chambered in .223. Goodnight Rob.
 
Listen, I am off to bed but I will humor you and give you something to ponder.

Should you shoot a 5.56 through a rifle chambered for .223? The answer is no because the pressure difference can be dangerous. So what do you need? You need a DIFFERENT cartridge. You would need a .223 to safely shoot that rifle chambered in .223. Goodnight Rob.
A 5.56 cartridge loaded for .223 pressures will work fine in a .223 rifle all day long.
Load that 5.56 for pressures above the safe range for .223 (~55k psi), and you risk your LIFE (remember? He said it in the video your offered to try and prove me wrong).

So, which .223" bullet makes a bigger hole in paper, traveling at 3,000FPS: The one fired from a .223 cartridge, or one fired from a 5.56 cartridge?
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,857
Views
466,313
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top