That means the whole SCOTUS has to go.So some judges didn't vote based on how they interpret the law? If that's the the case they need to go
Allow me to point out, the current border crisis started when Trump was president.
If they all voted for appearance...then they all need to go....That means the whole SCOTUS has to go.
Does that graphic include numbers for biden's flights too?Allow me to point out, the current border crisis started when Trump was president.
Since you seem to need pictures. Trump was POTUS in 2019:
View attachment 57194
Stop being a biased liar. It most certainly DID NOT start under Trump. There is a spike in the timeline of which Biden's is larger, but it did not start under Trump. There has been a southern border problem for a long time before Trump.Allow me to point out, the current border crisis started when Trump was president.
Since you seem to need pictures. Trump was POTUS in 2019:
View attachment 57194
Seems like it was more of a concern of Republicans having another freak out if they didn't get their way, like Jan 6th:
"'The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. In my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency,' Barrett wrote in her one-page opinion."
Allow me to point out, the current border crisis started when Trump was president.
Since you seem to need pictures. Trump was POTUS in 2019:
View attachment 57194
It didn't help that Democrats kept telling migrants to come.That large bump was right before Trumps border laws started to take effect and the wall was going up. Immigrants tried to get in before the laws kicked in and the wall was built.
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com