Current events discussion

lol ok bro.

Nope. I was talking about you, not myself. You failed.
You failed to comprehend the example, or the questions following it.

Hint: The example was merely words, and not meant to be a discussion of who said what.
Dunce cap for you.
Again.
You also have to comprehend.
Which you fail to do, all to often.
This whole argument comes down to the statement you just made. This is why you are wrong and confused.
You posited that a quote can't be part of a quote.
And you are worng about that, too.
You can share it all day long. If you don't comprehend it then it was pointless to share.
So you think the experts all have it wrong when they say that a quote does not have to be an entire original sentence. It can be a single word.
Professor ThxOne; Lingustics expert.
In his own mind.
Right, cause I am literally going to fly a drone large enough to fly a grown human over you, repel down and slap a pizza in your face.
So you use an idiotic example, but then get riled when the idiotic example is shown to be idiotic.
Good jod.
I forgot the sheltered life you live. Do you not know what the phrase "A pissing contest" means?
Do you not know the etymology of the phrase?
You want to see my junk, then you discuss a pissing contest.
2+2 = 4
Like a movie trailer?
Yea, you live ina movie trailer. Still not enough people to be iconic.
Oh so no balls to take a real wager. Ok.
$1,000 or $5,000 or $10,000 is a real wager.
You getting off on seeing my penis, or you getting off on showing me yours is not a wager.
It's just you wanting to deonstrate youyr latent homosexuality.
You get off no matter what thge outcome is.
Ahhh, I mentioned his name which to the left means he is my best friend, I support everything he does no matter what and laws do not apply to him.
YOU brought him up for a reason.
You don't know of anyone in a suit who is not an international criminal ******?

Expand your horizons beyond criminals.
See more of the world that exists outside your myopic vision.
 
You failed to comprehend the example, or the questions following it.

Hint: The example was merely words, and not meant to be a discussion of who said what.
Dunce cap for you.
Again.

Which you fail to do, all to often.

You posited that a quote can't be part of a quote.
And you are worng about that, too.

So you think the experts all have it wrong when they say that a quote does not have to be an entire original sentence. It can be a single word.
Professor ThxOne; Lingustics expert.
In his own mind.

So you use an idiotic example, but then get riled when the idiotic example is shown to be idiotic.
Good jod.

Do you not know the etymology of the phrase?
You want to see my junk, then you discuss a pissing contest.
2+2 = 4

Yea, you live ina movie trailer. Still not enough people to be iconic.

$1,000 or $5,000 or $10,000 is a real wager.
You getting off on seeing my penis, or you getting off on showing me yours is not a wager.
It's just you wanting to deonstrate youyr latent homosexuality.
You get off no matter what thge outcome is.

YOU brought him up for a reason.
You don't know of anyone in a suit who is not an international criminal ******?

Expand your horizons beyond criminals.
See more of the world that exists outside your myopic vision.
Cool story bro. At the end of this you still have no clue what Verbatim is or Ironic.
 
True... been here for it all. I said it then, he was out of line the way he treated you on your vendor post. I can't think of any actual positive thing he has done here. When has he agreed that team red has done anything good? When has he acknowledged the good that Trump has for sure done? Why does he think that Making America Great Again is bad? What if Trumps goal for MAGA was to come close to the economy between 1961-1969 where there was 53% economic expansion. Would Trump still be a bad guy?
What "vendor post" of Buck's was I "out of line" on?
Can you name the thread and give the post number? I'd like to read it and see how truly mean I was to Buck.

Alternatively, you can screenshot it and share here.
Thank you.

A goal menas nothing if there is no intent or ability to meet that goal.
You said it yourself that Trump's promises arew not to be taken literally. So, any claim of a goal he might make is simply bullshit, not to be taken literally.
Per YOU.
 
What "vendor post" of Buck's was I "out of line" on?
Can you name the thread and give the post number? I'd like to read it and see how truly mean I was to Buck.
Really, so you can relive your bigotry and hatred towards Buck? Grow the **** up man.
Alternatively, you can screenshot it and share here.
Thank you.

A goal menas nothing if there is no intent or ability to meet that goal.
You said it yourself that Trump's promises arew not to be taken literally. So, any claim of a goal he might make is simply bullshit, not to be taken literally.
Per YOU.
Whatever, hater.
 
I am throwing some specific questions his way to see how he genuinely responds. I am starting to think he may have a learning disability or literally some kind of -ism that is hindering him. I am hoping I am wrong cause I will feel bad for not feeling sorry for him.
"Learning disability"?

Tell us more about how "in" doesn't mean "in".
Tell us more about how abortion is not banned in Florida.
Tell us more about how a mono ampl has multiple outputs.
Tell us more how genitals detemrine ****** identity. Use a person born without genitals as the example to prove your point.
Tell us more about how Einstein was wrong, and time is a constant.
Tell us more about how there are no nerves in COMPACT bone.

Let's start with those claims you have made, then go from there.
 
"Learning disability"?

Tell us more about how "in" doesn't mean "in".
Tell us more about how abortion is not banned in Florida.
Tell us more about how a mono ampl has multiple outputs.
Tell us more how genitals detemrine ****** identity. Use a person born without genitals as the example to prove your point.
Tell us more about how Einstein was wrong, and time is a constant.
Tell us more about how there are no nerves in COMPACT bone.

Let's start with those claims you have made, then go from there.
Back to insults are ya?
 
Back to insults are ya?
"Learning disability"?

Tell us more about how "in" doesn't mean "in".
Tell us more about how abortion is not banned in Florida.
Tell us more about how a mono amp has multiple outputs.
Tell us more how genitals detemrine ****** identity. Use a person born without genitals as the example to prove your point.
Tell us more about how Einstein was wrong, and time is a constant.
Tell us more about how there are no nerves in COMPACT bone.

Let's start with those claims you have made, then go from there.


Can you point out the insult in there?
I don't see one.
Or do you consider it an insult simply when you get challeneged to prove your false beliefs?
 
Last edited:
Reverse psychology doesn't work on people smarter than you Rob.
So you verified yourself as a "******* liar".
Noted.

And I'll be happy to remind you of it, WITH PROOF, every time you call ME a liar but cannot prove it.

1756517149945.png
 
Last edited:
"Learning disability"?

Tell us more about how "in" doesn't mean "in".
In flight.
Tell us more about how abortion is not banned in Florida.
Never my claim.
Tell us more about how a mono amp has multiple outputs.
An output is a connection.
Tell us more how genitals detemrine ****** identity. Use a person born without genitals as the example to prove your point.
Get your spelling corrected. If the person born without genitals has XX she is a *****, XY is the man.
Tell us more about how Einstein was wrong, and time is a constant.
lol Really?
Tell us more about how there are no nerves in COMPACT bone.
Correct. They reside inside other structures.

So YOU think you won each one of these statements?
Let's start with those claims you have made, then go from there.

Can you point out the insult in there?
I don't see one.
Or do you consider it an insult simply when you get challeneged to prove your false beliefs?
SPELLING Rob... check it before you post.
 
In flight.
Another fail. Not meaning "inside" for that term.

Never my claim.
Are you Michael? Who posted THIS, if not you?
1756518406425.png

An output is a connection.
Oh? What is being output by these connections?
1756518510332.png

Get your spelling corrected. If the person born without genitals has XX she is a *****, XY is the man.
Get it "correcteD"? Aren't you the guy who used to cry that I would edit my posts to correct errors?
You're worse than a woman when it comes to making your mind.

Your claim was never about chomosomes. It was about genitals.
You are more indecisive than a woman.
lol Really?
Yeah, REALLY.
1756518775912.png

Correct. They reside inside other structures.
So the smallest nested Russian doll is not inside the biggest doll?
Tell us more about how that works.
So YOU think you won each one of these statements?
So there is no insult. Another ******* lie.
You're good at being a "******* liar".
SPELLING Rob... check it before you post.
"correcteD"
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,853
Views
464,588
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top