circuit breakers vs fuses

Originally posted by jlaine http://www.soundillusions.net/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=13

 

I'm very against circuit breakers in-car. I've had them fail before.
Circuitbreakers are desireable where fuse replacement is extremely inconvenient. But good ones cost a lot more than fuses. That's why they aren't used in cars. As for reliability, I disagree with the general consensus... there are no fuses on the Space Shuttle, on any aircraft, or on any ship.
 
Originally posted by maylar Circuitbreakers are desireable where fuse replacement is extremely inconvenient. But good ones cost a lot more than fuses. That's why they aren't used in cars. As for reliability, I disagree with the general consensus... there are no fuses on the Space Shuttle, on any aircraft, or on any ship.
circuit breakers on our houses too. wow that would be a pain in the *** if there were fuses instead. i probably blow the circuit in my bathroom once a week from the water hittin the circuit.

 
Originally posted by maylar Circuitbreakers are desireable where fuse replacement is extremely inconvenient. But good ones cost a lot more than fuses. That's why they aren't used in cars. As for reliability, I disagree with the general consensus... there are no fuses on the Space Shuttle, on any aircraft, or on any ship.
Umm..

This is not an aircraft, not a ship, and it WILL NOT be in a controlled environment like the others will be. If you are installing this the way you are *supposed* to, it will be less than 18" from the battery. Subjected to ice, dirt, rain, slush, and every temperature variance possible.

Flat out reason fuses are used: THEY ARE SAFER. A circuit breaker has moving parts, that CAN fail. They have failed, and I still have the unit that chose to fail. It nearly started a fire in my car. It's hanging on my wall as a reminder to forget the pretty resetting garbage.

Your attempt at a comparison is completely inaccurate, carefully note how the circuit breakers are installed in ALL of these places. Outside they are all enclosed in a nema4x enclosure or the equivalent, inside they are still enclosed to protect from the environment.

If you want to get *really* technical, places with heavy power demands use a 400 amp fused panel to feed the separate circuit breaker panels. Want to know why, call up your local electrical inspector and ask some questions.

 
My point is that there ARE INDEED circuitbreakers that can withstand environments WAY outside what you'll ever find in an automobile. I spent 17 years as a test engineer for a military electronics company, and I've seen circuitbreakers survive excelerated life testing in high vibration environments, at MIL-Spec temperature extremes, with 100% humidiy, 500 hours of salt spray (shipboard use) and whatever else we could throw at them. And they were NOT in sealed enclosures.

You wouldn't want to pay for them.

 
Originally posted by jlaine If you want to get *really* technical, places with heavy power demands use a 400 amp fused panel to feed the separate circuit breaker panels. Want to know why, call up your local electrical inspector and ask some questions.
Word.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

dlovescaraudio

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
dlovescaraudio
Joined
Location
stockton ca
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
11
Views
1,276
Last reply date
Last reply from
ftgu
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top