Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buck" data-source="post: 8725098" data-attributes="member: 591582">Like just for people doing ported boxes, some general type thoughts. Like an example would just be if you test rise between different port radiating sizes over a frequency bandwidth, leaving all other stats static.&nbsp; That&#039;s what I mean, not calculating every factor, but more relative calcualtions based around what people already have in their system.&nbsp; Like they&#039;ll know what voltage the subs are seeing if they already have the box everything set up, and to improve upon that, someone could test rise like I was saying with different ports.&nbsp; So if you want to get closer to a certain goal, you can take those generalities and apply them to the next box you build, without getting too complicated.&nbsp; Like there has to be a rise factor specifically based around the size of your port.&nbsp; If we could single out that factor and show the difference between say 8 in^2 per cube and 16 in^2 per cube or 20 even in relations to rise as the woofer plays across a frequency, people will absorb that.&nbsp; You could do the same with enclosure airspace.&nbsp; Or even round ports vs square ports.&nbsp; That would be real world proof too, not just numbers on a program.&nbsp; Sound and electricity are dynamic and alive, real world results are where it&#039;s at.&nbsp; We still&nbsp; don&#039;t understand electricity that well IMO.&nbsp; It does stuff we still don&#039;t understand.I work on the theory of KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid.&nbsp; You&#039;d want to develop something that most people can use with ease.&nbsp; You see what I&#039;m saying?&nbsp; I&#039;m sure some people have done this before. I&#039;m not even saying I&#039;m right on any of this, I&#039;m just freely thinking about easier ways for people to get close to the goals they want without needing a physics degree or an electrical engineering degree.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buck, post: 8725098, member: 591582"] Like just for people doing ported boxes, some general type thoughts. Like an example would just be if you test rise between different port radiating sizes over a frequency bandwidth, leaving all other stats static. That's what I mean, not calculating every factor, but more relative calcualtions based around what people already have in their system. Like they'll know what voltage the subs are seeing if they already have the box everything set up, and to improve upon that, someone could test rise like I was saying with different ports. So if you want to get closer to a certain goal, you can take those generalities and apply them to the next box you build, without getting too complicated. Like there has to be a rise factor specifically based around the size of your port. If we could single out that factor and show the difference between say 8 in^2 per cube and 16 in^2 per cube or 20 even in relations to rise as the woofer plays across a frequency, people will absorb that. You could do the same with enclosure airspace. Or even round ports vs square ports. That would be real world proof too, not just numbers on a program. Sound and electricity are dynamic and alive, real world results are where it's at. We still don't understand electricity that well IMO. It does stuff we still don't understand. I work on the theory of KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid. You'd want to develop something that most people can use with ease. You see what I'm saying? I'm sure some people have done this before. I'm not even saying I'm right on any of this, I'm just freely thinking about easier ways for people to get close to the goals they want without needing a physics degree or an electrical engineering degree. [/QUOTE]

Verification