Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pioneer~Saturn" data-source="post: 5050140" data-attributes="member: 569334">Just taking a quick look into it...it looks like you don&#039;t have enough airspace to make an optimal enclosure..//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gifWell, i&#039;ll rephrase that. If youre going to use a port of any decent size it will take up too much space..you&#039;ll come to like 2.8 cubes or so.EDIT AGAIN:When i used 23 for the depth that opened up some extra space..On RE&#039;s calculator type this in:-33width-14height-23depth (both top and bottom depths)-.75 material thickness-5&quot; wide port-12 long 2nd port segmentThat should get you to 3.53cubes, 62.5 sq inches of port area, tuned to 33Hz...still small, but that&#039;s about as good as it can get unless you can open up some more room</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pioneer~Saturn, post: 5050140, member: 569334"] Just taking a quick look into it...it looks like you don't have enough airspace to make an optimal enclosure..[IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif[/IMG] Well, i'll rephrase that. If youre going to use a port of any decent size it will take up too much space..you'll come to like 2.8 cubes or so. EDIT AGAIN: When i used 23 for the depth that opened up some extra space.. On RE's calculator type this in: -33width -14height -23depth (both top and bottom depths) -.75 material thickness -5" wide port -12 long 2nd port segment That should get you to 3.53cubes, 62.5 sq inches of port area, tuned to 33Hz...still small, but that's about as good as it can get unless you can open up some more room [/QUOTE]

Verification