Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Box design? And why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kush-divinity" data-source="post: 5167040" data-attributes="member: 599719"><p>Now, before we say sub up, port back in SUV, I want you to explain why it is the best, and how it performs with other enclosures.</p><p></p><p>Case in hand: Explorer, plenty of room, 2x 15 or 1x 18 SQ based sub.</p><p></p><p>I know sealed will provide fail proof SQ, but at a cost of output.</p><p></p><p>I love ported, but know that there are ideas out here that I have never tried before.</p><p></p><p>What design would provide the best performance when a balance of 75SQ/25SPL is desired?</p><p></p><p>I must have the extreme low end extension that a sealed box provides, and would like to have the bump in output of a ported. What design will grant me a fairly flat response, or one that is exaggerated in the very low end, while still reatining the higher bass notes up to 70hz? I am pretty handy in construction, so a radical design is not a problem.</p><p></p><p>I have saw plans involving a folded or "S" style port on this forum. How well does this work, as I realize that if I use a larger port, I get more output, but it must be longer to achieve the lower tuning frequency.</p><p></p><p>Also, does anyone know a ballpark number for resonant frequency in a 1994 4door Explorer? From my noobish tests using music and test notes----I see around 45hz as it? Am I close?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kush-divinity, post: 5167040, member: 599719"] Now, before we say sub up, port back in SUV, I want you to explain why it is the best, and how it performs with other enclosures. Case in hand: Explorer, plenty of room, 2x 15 or 1x 18 SQ based sub. I know sealed will provide fail proof SQ, but at a cost of output. I love ported, but know that there are ideas out here that I have never tried before. What design would provide the best performance when a balance of 75SQ/25SPL is desired? I must have the extreme low end extension that a sealed box provides, and would like to have the bump in output of a ported. What design will grant me a fairly flat response, or one that is exaggerated in the very low end, while still reatining the higher bass notes up to 70hz? I am pretty handy in construction, so a radical design is not a problem. I have saw plans involving a folded or "S" style port on this forum. How well does this work, as I realize that if I use a larger port, I get more output, but it must be longer to achieve the lower tuning frequency. Also, does anyone know a ballpark number for resonant frequency in a 1994 4door Explorer? From my noobish tests using music and test notes----I see around 45hz as it? Am I close? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Box design? And why?
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh