Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mrray13" data-source="post: 588596" data-attributes="member: 540942">hi ho.......anyway, i&#039;ll throw my subjective opinion in this mix as i currently have a rl-p 12 in 1.25ft^3 sealed being pushed by a hifonics nemsis nx750 in my wife&#039;s 2004 grand prix.1) sq is equal to if not better then most subs i have heard. the jl&#039;s w6, w7 being two subs that come to mind being in the same ballpark.2) the comparision was indeed between the rl-p and eclipse alum because of cone material, with the rl-p, imo, being as good as if not better then the alum for sq. the ti&#039;s **** imo for sq, i have yet to hear any in any install sound good. i actually like the eclipse alum more then the ti.3)they(rl-p) do indeed get loud and they get low. they handle transitions exceptionally well, regardless of music played, it&#039;ll keep up.4)the rl-p has been compared to the brahma quite a bit, though i think the brahma might handle a touch more power(at least rated), so spl will/ should fall in the brahma&#039;s favor.5)the rl-i series is indeed an exact copy of the tc2+ driver. the rl-p&#039;s are based on the tc9&#039;s.6) the rl-p&#039;s and rl-i&#039;s are underrated. mike (the owner of soundsplinter) is currently feeding his pair of 10&quot; rl-i&#039;s 3000wrms. of course i doubt he&#039;s wangin full tilt nonstop...lol. the rl-p&#039;s are rated for 500wrms and mine is more then happy with 750 wrms....it&#039;s all in set-up and using them properly.7) soundsplinter&#039;s customer courtesy is second to none. mike will answer any and all emails quickly and honestly. even if it means not recommending his product.8) the rl-p i own is far and away the best sql woofer i have owned, which includes..memphis hpo&#039;s, rf hx2&#039;s, cerwin vega vegad4&#039;s, treo ss (these were really nice!) jlw0, mtx 6000&#039;s,and a slew of others. but overall sq goes to the rl-p fairly easily, not withstanding it&#039;s the only one i&#039;ve ran sealed.9) give <a href="http://mailto:" target="_blank">mike@soundsplinter.com</a> a shout. then u&#039;ll understand why i&#039;m soundsplinters biggest fan!!if anyone has any questions, give me a shout...or check out <a href="http://www.soundsolutionsaudio.com/forum/index.php?showforum=41" target="_blank">soundsplinter&#039;s official forum</a>my install can be seen here as well...<a href="http://www.soundsplinter.com/customer_installs/Kent/index.html" target="_blank">the grand prix&#039;s install</a>check out the site and forum.....don&#039;t forget i&#039;m almost always around.soundsplinter should always be on ur list when shopping for new subs...they are way worth it!!!wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mrray13, post: 588596, member: 540942"] hi ho....... anyway, i'll throw my subjective opinion in this mix as i currently have a rl-p 12 in 1.25ft^3 sealed being pushed by a hifonics nemsis nx750 in my wife's 2004 grand prix. 1) sq is equal to if not better then most subs i have heard. the jl's w6, w7 being two subs that come to mind being in the same ballpark. 2) the comparision was indeed between the rl-p and eclipse alum because of cone material, with the rl-p, imo, being as good as if not better then the alum for sq. the ti's **** imo for sq, i have yet to hear any in any install sound good. i actually like the eclipse alum more then the ti. 3)they(rl-p) do indeed get loud and they get low. they handle transitions exceptionally well, regardless of music played, it'll keep up. 4)the rl-p has been compared to the brahma quite a bit, though i think the brahma might handle a touch more power(at least rated), so spl will/ should fall in the brahma's favor. 5)the rl-i series is indeed an exact copy of the tc2+ driver. the rl-p's are based on the tc9's. 6) the rl-p's and rl-i's are underrated. mike (the owner of soundsplinter) is currently feeding his pair of 10" rl-i's 3000wrms. of course i doubt he's wangin full tilt nonstop...lol. the rl-p's are rated for 500wrms and mine is more then happy with 750 wrms....it's all in set-up and using them properly. 7) soundsplinter's customer courtesy is second to none. mike will answer any and all emails quickly and honestly. even if it means [I]not[/I] recommending his product. 8) the rl-p i own is far and away the best sql woofer i have owned, which includes..memphis hpo's, rf hx2's, cerwin vega vegad4's, treo ss (these were really nice!) jlw0, mtx 6000's,and a slew of others. but overall sq goes to the rl-p fairly easily, not withstanding it's the only one i've ran sealed. 9) give [URL="mailto:"]mike@soundsplinter.com[/URL] a shout. then u'll understand why i'm soundsplinters biggest fan!! if anyone has any questions, give me a shout...or check out [URL="http://www.soundsolutionsaudio.com/forum/index.php?showforum=41"]soundsplinter's official forum[/URL] my install can be seen here as well... [URL="http://www.soundsplinter.com/customer_installs/Kent/index.html"]the grand prix's install[/URL] check out the site and forum.....don't forget i'm almost always around. soundsplinter should always be on ur list when shopping for new subs...they are way worth it!!! wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification