Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
blueprint subs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="idiot" data-source="post: 588336" data-attributes="member: 550902"><p>Awesome reply. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p><p></p><p>Would cone materials alter sound in any significant way? The Soundsplinter sub uses an aluminum cone, while I was under the impression that the A series and D2 did not (I’m not entirely sure about the D2, though). The only other subs that I’ve seen using an aluminum cone have been TC Sound’s giant 34mm xmax sub, presumably designed to achieve high SPL, and Eclipse’s Ti and TiPro, which are also credited for their potential for loudness. So does the cone construction have any significant bearing on this? I assume that it would increase moving mass, and would therefore require a stronger motor to control its motion properly… ?</p><p></p><p>Also, the Soundsplinter is $100 cheaper than the D2 ($250 vs. $350). I was also considering the Oz Matrix Elite, which is $400 direct from factory. They all share the same buildhouse, I believe. (Does Oz still use TC Sounds?)</p><p></p><p>At this point, I’m convinced that I’ll get the desired volume from any of these subs. The question is now about more subjective things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="idiot, post: 588336, member: 550902"] Awesome reply. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] Would cone materials alter sound in any significant way? The Soundsplinter sub uses an aluminum cone, while I was under the impression that the A series and D2 did not (I’m not entirely sure about the D2, though). The only other subs that I’ve seen using an aluminum cone have been TC Sound’s giant 34mm xmax sub, presumably designed to achieve high SPL, and Eclipse’s Ti and TiPro, which are also credited for their potential for loudness. So does the cone construction have any significant bearing on this? I assume that it would increase moving mass, and would therefore require a stronger motor to control its motion properly… ? Also, the Soundsplinter is $100 cheaper than the D2 ($250 vs. $350). I was also considering the Oz Matrix Elite, which is $400 direct from factory. They all share the same buildhouse, I believe. (Does Oz still use TC Sounds?) At this point, I’m convinced that I’ll get the desired volume from any of these subs. The question is now about more subjective things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
blueprint subs?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list