Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Better SQ - JL 10w3v2 or IA i10?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gunz4me2" data-source="post: 7927390" data-attributes="member: 613729"><p>I wasn't impressed with my 10w3V2s in a sealed enclosure. I think the modeled F3 point was between 50 and 60 Hz with .6 cubic feet per 10. As a result, I had no sub bass, but midbass was impressive.</p><p></p><p>EDIT I was close... Here is how they model in 1.2 for both:</p><p></p><p>Type: Closed Box</p><p></p><p>Shape: Prism, square</p><p></p><p>Vb = 1.2 cu.ft</p><p></p><p>Qtc = 0.697</p><p></p><p>F3 = 53.01 Hz</p><p></p><p>Fill = heavy</p><p></p><p>One more thing. Power and EQ only went so far with them because it didn't take much to push those subs to their mechanical limits. I tried them ported with less power, and while impressive, they unloaded rather easily.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gunz4me2, post: 7927390, member: 613729"] I wasn't impressed with my 10w3V2s in a sealed enclosure. I think the modeled F3 point was between 50 and 60 Hz with .6 cubic feet per 10. As a result, I had no sub bass, but midbass was impressive. EDIT I was close... Here is how they model in 1.2 for both: Type: Closed Box Shape: Prism, square Vb = 1.2 cu.ft Qtc = 0.697 F3 = 53.01 Hz Fill = heavy One more thing. Power and EQ only went so far with them because it didn't take much to push those subs to their mechanical limits. I tried them ported with less power, and while impressive, they unloaded rather easily. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Better SQ - JL 10w3v2 or IA i10?
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh