Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="adam71" data-source="post: 4500524" data-attributes="member: 549079">I think a better place to start with this is to ask you what are you trying to achieve that your 9887 did NOT.??You placed 6th in &quot;consumer Q&quot; thats pretty good.&nbsp;&nbsp; Can I ask how many others were in your power class??&nbsp; Were you really close and you just want something to boost your system over the edge?&nbsp; Or were you way off and you think you need a system facelift?I know that the Nak 700 will sound warmer than your current deck.&nbsp; I also know the MAC will too.&nbsp; Ive only heard those 2 decks once each so I don&#039;t really consider myself &quot;experienced&quot; with them.&nbsp; But I do know they have a warm signature for the most part.I think of all the decks that people have listed in this thread that will be the biggest improvement would be an ODR system.&nbsp; Although this would NOT be a cheap upgrade.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="adam71, post: 4500524, member: 549079"] I think a better place to start with this is to ask you what are you trying to achieve that your 9887 did NOT.?? You placed 6th in "consumer Q" thats pretty good. Can I ask how many others were in your power class?? Were you really close and you just want something to boost your system over the edge? Or were you way off and you think you need a system facelift? I know that the Nak 700 will sound warmer than your current deck. I also know the MAC will too. Ive only heard those 2 decks once each so I don't really consider myself "experienced" with them. But I do know they have a warm signature for the most part. I think of all the decks that people have listed in this thread that will be the biggest improvement would be an ODR system. Although this would NOT be a cheap upgrade. [/QUOTE]

Verification