Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Are 8's the new 12's?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ibanender" data-source="post: 2443058" data-attributes="member: 555208"><p>OK, you have 1 internet source that says that. Go build a few things, test it in a real world application and get back to me on that. Everything I know is from physically doing it, not what somebody told me or I read somewhere. There are A LOT of reference materials written 40 years ago that were true then, but with modern technology do not apply anymore.</p><p></p><p>You've been asking me to explain for the last page and a half, but I have been explaining for the last 5 pages.</p><p></p><p>You keep saying a larger cone has a lower Fs, which in turn has a lower F3, which means the response is lower. If the response is lower, it plays lower. So just drug out the long way of saying 15's play lower than 8's. What exactly is it that you are arguing anyway? It looks like you keep changing your mind on what you have been saying. It seems like it started with 8's don't play low and you've migrated through a few things all the way down to the F3 of a box is the point where you pick up chicks because your Fs hangs low.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ibanender, post: 2443058, member: 555208"] OK, you have 1 internet source that says that. Go build a few things, test it in a real world application and get back to me on that. Everything I know is from physically doing it, not what somebody told me or I read somewhere. There are A LOT of reference materials written 40 years ago that were true then, but with modern technology do not apply anymore. You've been asking me to explain for the last page and a half, but I have been explaining for the last 5 pages. You keep saying a larger cone has a lower Fs, which in turn has a lower F3, which means the response is lower. If the response is lower, it plays lower. So just drug out the long way of saying 15's play lower than 8's. What exactly is it that you are arguing anyway? It looks like you keep changing your mind on what you have been saying. It seems like it started with 8's don't play low and you've migrated through a few things all the way down to the F3 of a box is the point where you pick up chicks because your Fs hangs low. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Are 8's the new 12's?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list