Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Are 8's the new 12's?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 2442079" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Its funny you say Im not getting it, yet I am, and you aren't. Hello, different model subs compared, you can find all sorts of smaller subs that when compared to a different brand/model sub, exhibits the same (or similar) Fs and F3 results. Wow, newsflash. But uhm, that's beside what Ive said, all along. If you are gong to be condescending, at least be accurate.</p><p>And after all this, after you demanding I explain "WHY", and after I state I dont know why (only that the relationship exists), and specifically ask YOU to explain, you do not. Instead you say you've explained 3 times. You are stating suspension is a huge factor in Fs. Again hello, I already stated I know this. That does not explain the "WHY" that you were demanding from me earlier. So, if you are gonna badger me to do something, I should be able to expect you to be able to do it. Please, feel free to re-read my previous post where I stated I knew it was related to suspension compliance but didnt understand why suspension stiffness contributes to LFE, and answer the question. Otherwise, get off my back for not having done so.</p><p></p><p>Oh, so you've quoted me in this thread said why Fs changes? You've quoted me stating 'moving mass' affects LFE? No, you haven't, and yet you continue to accuse me of saying these things. Then tell me Im the one not 'getting it' here. Until this trend ceases, I will continue to ask you (and anyone else) to stop placing words in my mouth I did not say.</p><p>What does your 'guess' on my background have to do with this discussion beyond you trying to attack me on some personal level now? You dont know me or my experience, dont presume to. Your little experiment with a 5.25 speaker in a T-line... I did the same experiment in the early 90's while attending installer institute. But yes, I really needed you and hoss to explain this to me, today, in this thread. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif Im not the brain dead noobit you keep trying to portray me as. </p><p>Why the hostility? Ive already stated I do not fully understand the relationship between Fs and LFE, yet instead of taking that opportunity to tell me/us, you instead chose to attack me in this manner. If this continues, I will not. Im not interested in some petty personal attackfest.</p><p></p><p>Nice example, yet another one comparing different drivers. Again, I get it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif Eventhough that is not the situation I have been talking about (Fs lowering as cone sizes increases on <em>same model subs</em>), I acknowledge the point you are making, and have been continually making for like 3 pages now. Are we clear yet? That still does not explain the "WHY" you have asked me to discuss. Now Im asking you, again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 2442079, member: 549629"] Its funny you say Im not getting it, yet I am, and you aren't. Hello, different model subs compared, you can find all sorts of smaller subs that when compared to a different brand/model sub, exhibits the same (or similar) Fs and F3 results. Wow, newsflash. But uhm, that's beside what Ive said, all along. If you are gong to be condescending, at least be accurate. And after all this, after you demanding I explain "WHY", and after I state I dont know why (only that the relationship exists), and specifically ask YOU to explain, you do not. Instead you say you've explained 3 times. You are stating suspension is a huge factor in Fs. Again hello, I already stated I know this. That does not explain the "WHY" that you were demanding from me earlier. So, if you are gonna badger me to do something, I should be able to expect you to be able to do it. Please, feel free to re-read my previous post where I stated I knew it was related to suspension compliance but didnt understand why suspension stiffness contributes to LFE, and answer the question. Otherwise, get off my back for not having done so. Oh, so you've quoted me in this thread said why Fs changes? You've quoted me stating 'moving mass' affects LFE? No, you haven't, and yet you continue to accuse me of saying these things. Then tell me Im the one not 'getting it' here. Until this trend ceases, I will continue to ask you (and anyone else) to stop placing words in my mouth I did not say. What does your 'guess' on my background have to do with this discussion beyond you trying to attack me on some personal level now? You dont know me or my experience, dont presume to. Your little experiment with a 5.25 speaker in a T-line... I did the same experiment in the early 90's while attending installer institute. But yes, I really needed you and hoss to explain this to me, today, in this thread. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif[/IMG] Im not the brain dead noobit you keep trying to portray me as. Why the hostility? Ive already stated I do not fully understand the relationship between Fs and LFE, yet instead of taking that opportunity to tell me/us, you instead chose to attack me in this manner. If this continues, I will not. Im not interested in some petty personal attackfest. Nice example, yet another one comparing different drivers. Again, I get it. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif[/IMG] Eventhough that is not the situation I have been talking about (Fs lowering as cone sizes increases on [I]same model subs[/I]), I acknowledge the point you are making, and have been continually making for like 3 pages now. Are we clear yet? That still does not explain the "WHY" you have asked me to discuss. Now Im asking you, again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Are 8's the new 12's?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
