Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Anyone use this sound deadener?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mastershake575" data-source="post: 8785990" data-attributes="member: 665251"><p>Chris's page was posted on the first page and tells you everything you need.</p><p></p><p>To absolutely no surprise cheap overseas knockoff selling at 80% less price isn't as good and you have to use way more to get similiar results (some of these variants are so low quality that you won't even get same results if you smear 4x as much on)</p><p> It's a 100% fair comparison. These higher end deadeners (shouldn't even say high-end, should just say deadeners that are actually real and don't use filler) are more efficient.</p><p></p><p>The only logical way that comparison wouldn't be fair is if you believe every single deadener is basically the same so higher efficiency shouldn't come into play</p><p></p><p> " Looking at this, Noico is definitely a much better performer than Kilmat. Now comparing it to ResoNix. ResoNix lowers the resonance peak another 7.5dB lower than Noico. This equates to ResoNix being 5.62x more effective at reducing resonance in a given panel. Noico can be found for as low as $1.97 per square foot. Price to performance vs. ResoNix CLD Squares, you would spend $11.07 to get enough Noico to, in theory, be as effective as ResoNix. 5.62x the amount would need to be applied. This is also not as good of a value, especially when you consider the extra work required to apply all of that additional product. "</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]37044[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p> These results shouldn't even be shocking.</p><p></p><p>Your literally creating and shipping a product half way across the globe and still charging 80% less money then a geniune product. Of course the quality is going to be drastically different (cheap fillers and low R&D budget).</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>Back to the original opening post, no stay away from Kilmat, Mat66, Fatmat, Siless, Noico. Use a higher quality product but less of it. It will be less work, similiar if not better results, won't actually cost you any more, and you won't have to worry about potential toxic fillers/chemicals. </em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mastershake575, post: 8785990, member: 665251"] Chris's page was posted on the first page and tells you everything you need. To absolutely no surprise cheap overseas knockoff selling at 80% less price isn't as good and you have to use way more to get similiar results (some of these variants are so low quality that you won't even get same results if you smear 4x as much on) It's a 100% fair comparison. These higher end deadeners (shouldn't even say high-end, should just say deadeners that are actually real and don't use filler) are more efficient. The only logical way that comparison wouldn't be fair is if you believe every single deadener is basically the same so higher efficiency shouldn't come into play " Looking at this, Noico is definitely a much better performer than Kilmat. Now comparing it to ResoNix. ResoNix lowers the resonance peak another 7.5dB lower than Noico. This equates to ResoNix being 5.62x more effective at reducing resonance in a given panel. Noico can be found for as low as $1.97 per square foot. Price to performance vs. ResoNix CLD Squares, you would spend $11.07 to get enough Noico to, in theory, be as effective as ResoNix. 5.62x the amount would need to be applied. This is also not as good of a value, especially when you consider the extra work required to apply all of that additional product. " [ATTACH type="full" alt="37044"]37044[/ATTACH] These results shouldn't even be shocking. Your literally creating and shipping a product half way across the globe and still charging 80% less money then a geniune product. Of course the quality is going to be drastically different (cheap fillers and low R&D budget). [B][I]Back to the original opening post, no stay away from Kilmat, Mat66, Fatmat, Siless, Noico. Use a higher quality product but less of it. It will be less work, similiar if not better results, won't actually cost you any more, and you won't have to worry about potential toxic fillers/chemicals. [/I][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Anyone use this sound deadener?
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh