Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Aeroports can decrease port size by 50%???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mlstrass" data-source="post: 3467720" data-attributes="member: 569126"><p>In the original post about the 4" PVC vs a 4" aero and the gain of 7dB is it possible that a 4" port was not enough for the box tested, so by going to an aero which offers more airflow he wasn't choking the box as much and saw the big gain? Sorry for the long *** sentence...</p><p></p><p>Back to the original topic, is it pretty much accepted that by using aero's you can use 1/2 the normal required port area? If so then I could see the advantage to using them over a slot port, even for some daily boxes where the port can ending up taking up a LOT of box space.</p><p></p><p>I've only built one box with an aero, it was 4.25^3 @ 26Hz for a single 15" Tempest. It used a single 4" aero and had NO port noise, was very musical, and got surprisinly loud. This was a copy of the infamous "magic box" from a few years back on CSO when the Tempest was all the rage.</p><p></p><p>I sold the box/sub for $80 to some girl and now and then I hear from her about how her friends are amazed at how it kills their dual 12" set ups from BB/CC and it's a no name sub...LOL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mlstrass, post: 3467720, member: 569126"] In the original post about the 4" PVC vs a 4" aero and the gain of 7dB is it possible that a 4" port was not enough for the box tested, so by going to an aero which offers more airflow he wasn't choking the box as much and saw the big gain? Sorry for the long *** sentence... Back to the original topic, is it pretty much accepted that by using aero's you can use 1/2 the normal required port area? If so then I could see the advantage to using them over a slot port, even for some daily boxes where the port can ending up taking up a LOT of box space. I've only built one box with an aero, it was 4.25^3 @ 26Hz for a single 15" Tempest. It used a single 4" aero and had NO port noise, was very musical, and got surprisinly loud. This was a copy of the infamous "magic box" from a few years back on CSO when the Tempest was all the rage. I sold the box/sub for $80 to some girl and now and then I hear from her about how her friends are amazed at how it kills their dual 12" set ups from BB/CC and it's a no name sub...LOL [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Aeroports can decrease port size by 50%???
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list