Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="adam71" data-source="post: 3704125" data-attributes="member: 549079"><p><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" />What?  Why would that be the only reason to compare the two.  I don't understand what that statement even means.  Not only that, why couldn't they be compared on looks, ease of use or just looking for a certian sound??  I've had systems where the deck was "do it all" deck.  Yet, I chose to do everything outboard (eq and crossover) and my system ended up sounding better and MORE flexible because of it.  Don't get me wrong I could have ended up with noise because of the extra components in the signal chain.  So sometimes less is better.  But NOT always.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Top