Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Head Units
880PRS vs 8053
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bass_lover1" data-source="post: 2215067" data-attributes="member: 555256"><p>Ummm, 8053 would be about 2-3 years ago top of the line ECLIPSE....not alpine, but yea.</p><p></p><p>I've owned my 880 for probably around 4 months, and it is deffinitely worth it IMO.</p><p></p><p>At first I wasn't too excited when switching from my Nak CD400, I LOVED that HU but it was time to move on, I wanted to get out of the limited market for passive setups (to me anyway) and had to go active. SQ wise, at first it was <em>close</em> to that of the Nak, but after you take the time to sit down and tune the crap out of it...it blows the Nak out of the water IMO.</p><p></p><p>I have no experience w/ the 8053 though, but if it makes a difference I was in the same boat as you and decided to get the 880.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bass_lover1, post: 2215067, member: 555256"] Ummm, 8053 would be about 2-3 years ago top of the line ECLIPSE....not alpine, but yea. I've owned my 880 for probably around 4 months, and it is deffinitely worth it IMO. At first I wasn't too excited when switching from my Nak CD400, I LOVED that HU but it was time to move on, I wanted to get out of the limited market for passive setups (to me anyway) and had to go active. SQ wise, at first it was [I]close[/I] to that of the Nak, but after you take the time to sit down and tune the crap out of it...it blows the Nak out of the water IMO. I have no experience w/ the 8053 though, but if it makes a difference I was in the same boat as you and decided to get the 880. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Head Units
880PRS vs 8053
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
