Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
8" Compare Decision Help
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7463650" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Unfortunately it is true that many times raising the tweeters up to the pillars improves things, but it also adds a fundamental acoustical flaw in the form of point source differences. Ideally the mid and tweet will as close as possible, potentially even braxially mounted as shown in the OP. And of course, there's also the (popular) school of thought on pathlengths, and mounting his mid/tweet in the kicks, exactly the opposite of bringing them up to the pillars.</p><p></p><p>Pillar mounted tweets = (accurately) high sound stage, good stereo separation, large pathlength differences.</p><p></p><p>Kick mounted tweets = short pathlength differences, lower sound stage (dash affects this a lot), less separation.</p><p></p><p>If this was a driver's side only SQ setup, Id say pillars is fine. You can process out most of the problems, but only for one listening position. If you want the system to sound good for your passenger as well, Id tend to lean towards a kick panel setup. But of course other factors contribute, such as the vehicle itself, and even personal listening preference.</p><p></p><p>But thinking back to the OP, Ive strayed off topic, and I apologize.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7463650, member: 549629"] Unfortunately it is true that many times raising the tweeters up to the pillars improves things, but it also adds a fundamental acoustical flaw in the form of point source differences. Ideally the mid and tweet will as close as possible, potentially even braxially mounted as shown in the OP. And of course, there's also the (popular) school of thought on pathlengths, and mounting his mid/tweet in the kicks, exactly the opposite of bringing them up to the pillars. Pillar mounted tweets = (accurately) high sound stage, good stereo separation, large pathlength differences. Kick mounted tweets = short pathlength differences, lower sound stage (dash affects this a lot), less separation. If this was a driver's side only SQ setup, Id say pillars is fine. You can process out most of the problems, but only for one listening position. If you want the system to sound good for your passenger as well, Id tend to lean towards a kick panel setup. But of course other factors contribute, such as the vehicle itself, and even personal listening preference. But thinking back to the OP, Ive strayed off topic, and I apologize. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
8" Compare Decision Help
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list