Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Builds
Car Audio Build Logs
2000 Camry Build
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Doxquzme" data-source="post: 8864115" data-attributes="member: 689267"><p>The 65s/20.2 has a .75" tweeter which will have a wider dispersion pattern but they are also rated to take less power. the <a href="https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/sets/hd/hd65s262.php" target="_blank">CDT Audio HD-65S/26.2</a> can handle more power and the difference in the dome dispersion pattern is not all the significant at all considering how close one is to the tweeter. Go with the 26.2 IMHO. Keep in mind that the RMS rating is at above 110Hz, most 100 watt RMS rated speakers will take a lot more power with a x-over point that high. Compare efficiency ratings, that is going to be a better spec to factor in.</p><p></p><p>These pioneers crossed over at 110hz will most likely match the output of the CTD's, so would many others. I like the CTDs but I'm not fan of ratings that stipulate you have to cross them at 110hz to attain that rating.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.ebay.com/itm/304990827111?mkcid=1&mkrid=711-53200-19255-0&siteid=0&customid=link&campid=5335951755&toolid=20001&mkevt=1[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Doxquzme, post: 8864115, member: 689267"] The 65s/20.2 has a .75" tweeter which will have a wider dispersion pattern but they are also rated to take less power. the [URL='https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/sets/hd/hd65s262.php']CDT Audio HD-65S/26.2[/URL] can handle more power and the difference in the dome dispersion pattern is not all the significant at all considering how close one is to the tweeter. Go with the 26.2 IMHO. Keep in mind that the RMS rating is at above 110Hz, most 100 watt RMS rated speakers will take a lot more power with a x-over point that high. Compare efficiency ratings, that is going to be a better spec to factor in. These pioneers crossed over at 110hz will most likely match the output of the CTD's, so would many others. I like the CTDs but I'm not fan of ratings that stipulate you have to cross them at 110hz to attain that rating. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.ebay.com/itm/304990827111?mkcid=1&mkrid=711-53200-19255-0&siteid=0&customid=link&campid=5335951755&toolid=20001&mkevt=1[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Builds
Car Audio Build Logs
2000 Camry Build
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list