Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="audio_phill" data-source="post: 7096316" data-attributes="member: 605512"><p>lol, newbs... Cone area is less relative to output as is any of the electro-mechanicals. The 15" Ti(depending n which version) is possibly a totally different animal. The 88120Ti is a very similar driver to most of the better Al's (tc9 based and sw88120) and the 15 would be easier to encorporate into a proper enclosure since the 12's were high Vas low/mid Qts so most of them needed larger boxes than most will accomodate. The 15 (if its an 88150Ti) is very efficient and has the same Q and is substantially more efficient. The 9152 was a high Qts sub and is only as efficient as the average 12" Al and needed massive enclosures. So, losses due to improper enclosure volumes may be the determining factor, as would be tuning and cabin gain/resonance lol. Displacement/Sd is not very relative to output potential.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Top