Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
15" si mag vs. Idmax SQ BATTLE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hintzyboy" data-source="post: 2965009" data-attributes="member: 566521"><p>OK, perhaps I just misunderstood some of the information here. Very early in the thread, when the "there is no such thing as a fast/slow sub" conversation was started, I asked what made one woofer more able to separate notes in a quick bass line such as in a song with double-kick drums. That was when all the transient response stuff began to emerge.</p><p></p><p>Now about the contradictions. I didn't memorize the Adire article, but in my understanding, it implied that a woofer with better transient response (identifiable by a lower inductance) would be better at keeping up with quick bass lines and would not sound sloppy, sluggish, etc. Then you come in saying that differences in transient response are inaudible for subwoofers. That's where I'm seeing the contradiction. It is completely possible that I misunderstood what one or both of you (Yourself and the Adire article) have said, but to my understanding there are contradictions in the information.</p><p></p><p>Regarding the last part, if you don't understand that posting the whole "Is that big enough for you" thing was the essence of condescension, you need to review your 8th grade vocabulary quizzes. (*Hint, that was condescending)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hintzyboy, post: 2965009, member: 566521"] OK, perhaps I just misunderstood some of the information here. Very early in the thread, when the "there is no such thing as a fast/slow sub" conversation was started, I asked what made one woofer more able to separate notes in a quick bass line such as in a song with double-kick drums. That was when all the transient response stuff began to emerge. Now about the contradictions. I didn't memorize the Adire article, but in my understanding, it implied that a woofer with better transient response (identifiable by a lower inductance) would be better at keeping up with quick bass lines and would not sound sloppy, sluggish, etc. Then you come in saying that differences in transient response are inaudible for subwoofers. That's where I'm seeing the contradiction. It is completely possible that I misunderstood what one or both of you (Yourself and the Adire article) have said, but to my understanding there are contradictions in the information. Regarding the last part, if you don't understand that posting the whole "Is that big enough for you" thing was the essence of condescension, you need to review your 8th grade vocabulary quizzes. (*Hint, that was condescending) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
15" si mag vs. Idmax SQ BATTLE
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list