Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
12" vs 15"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7368384" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>You refer right back to smaller cones are more accurate, but completely ignored my point that the larger sub will be required to move less/slower in order to maintain the same output level as the smaller sub. I think this was a pretty significant point for you to overlook. More mass does not necessarily mean more inertia, in this context.</p><p></p><p>And again, 'trying to control 300 grams' when we are referring to stopping and starting it 20-80 times a second, boils down to motor force much more than a few grams difference in weight. You say yourself that 'linear motors shine' at control... why do they "shine"? Because they exhibit linear motor force throughout the cone excursion range. Motor force, not moving mass.</p><p></p><p>I referred to this much earlier in the thread. Your lack of response on it suggests you didn't look into it like I suggested, so here is the direct link for you to read... <a href="http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/WooferSpeed.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/WooferSpeed.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>Cheers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 7368384, member: 549629"] You refer right back to smaller cones are more accurate, but completely ignored my point that the larger sub will be required to move less/slower in order to maintain the same output level as the smaller sub. I think this was a pretty significant point for you to overlook. More mass does not necessarily mean more inertia, in this context. And again, 'trying to control 300 grams' when we are referring to stopping and starting it 20-80 times a second, boils down to motor force much more than a few grams difference in weight. You say yourself that 'linear motors shine' at control... why do they "shine"? Because they exhibit linear motor force throughout the cone excursion range. Motor force, not moving mass. I referred to this much earlier in the thread. Your lack of response on it suggests you didn't look into it like I suggested, so here is the direct link for you to read... [URL="http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/WooferSpeed.pdf"]http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/WooferSpeed.pdf[/URL] Cheers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
12" vs 15"
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh