Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
12" NVX VCW124 Subwoofer 1000 watts RMS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 8628953" data-attributes="member: 572595"><p>it was much more efficient above 45HZ and was DRY not natural as i would have liked down low. just like the issue your having. when we tried 1.8(recommend for HIFI) we lost all the topend transient response that made it sound great uptop for slightly better low-end.then it was smooth but didn't have the punch. the ported box was the best of both worlds. it was more balanced with more low-end and needed alot less power to do so. 2 was way too boomy and if you tuned any higher than about 34 it got peaky quick. i think this was the older v2 but they haven't changed a whole lot. Ill bet if you try what i suggested you like it..</p><p></p><p>stil one of my favorite subs are the IDmaxes. i bet 6 of those suckers would be awesome</p><p></p><p>also tuning low avoided the common phase shift and group delay associated with 99% of ported applications and killed the excellent transition between the fundamentals and harmonics you and I like. ESP on jazz and softer more bassy music.</p><p></p><p>try it before you comment. i used the IDQ and I've designed a few boxes for the IDmax 12s.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 8628953, member: 572595"] it was much more efficient above 45HZ and was DRY not natural as i would have liked down low. just like the issue your having. when we tried 1.8(recommend for HIFI) we lost all the topend transient response that made it sound great uptop for slightly better low-end.then it was smooth but didn't have the punch. the ported box was the best of both worlds. it was more balanced with more low-end and needed alot less power to do so. 2 was way too boomy and if you tuned any higher than about 34 it got peaky quick. i think this was the older v2 but they haven't changed a whole lot. Ill bet if you try what i suggested you like it.. stil one of my favorite subs are the IDmaxes. i bet 6 of those suckers would be awesome also tuning low avoided the common phase shift and group delay associated with 99% of ported applications and killed the excellent transition between the fundamentals and harmonics you and I like. ESP on jazz and softer more bassy music. try it before you comment. i used the IDQ and I've designed a few boxes for the IDmax 12s. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
12" NVX VCW124 Subwoofer 1000 watts RMS
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh