Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 3425882" data-attributes="member: 549629">Two can play that game. lets highlight a couple things you forgot to...This was my reply:&quot;Sd is only one portion of the equation in displacement potential. If you dont know what that means, or how it relates to what ive quoted... you should.&quot;In other words, you stating the speaker with the larger piston naturally plays lows better is an over generalization. Which still holds true, even after the pages of excuses and techo-babble from you.Notice, for example, the last comment of yours I quoted... &quot;you are gunna have a hard time emphasizing any lows from 8&#039;s&quot;. No where do you mention an 8 with a high Fs, you simply say that 8&#039;s are incapable of reproducing low bass well. What was the word you used later... struggled. An over generalization.Only later, after its brought to your attention, do you google Fs and a few other jewels of info and weave it into your logic. And we see how well that turned out for you... &quot;the Fs is the value for their peak responce&quot;. Nice little jewel of information that was.Lastly, your sentenses would make more sence, and people might take your responces more seriously, if you were to work on enhansing your spelling skillses.In conclusion, we do still agree that your mom&#039;s trunk bangs. (yes helo, Im implying Ive had anal secks with her, big time)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 3425882, member: 549629"] Two can play that game. lets highlight a couple things you forgot to... This was my reply: "Sd is only one portion of the equation in displacement potential. If you dont know what that means, or how it relates to what ive quoted... you should." In other words, you stating the speaker with the larger piston naturally plays lows better is an over generalization. Which still holds true, even after the pages of excuses and techo-babble from you. Notice, for example, the last comment of yours I quoted... "[I]you are gunna have a hard time emphasizing any lows from 8's[/I]". No where do you mention an 8 with a high Fs, you simply say that 8's are incapable of reproducing low bass well. What was the word you used later... struggled. An over generalization. Only later, after its brought to your attention, do you google Fs and a few other jewels of info and weave it into your logic. And we see how well that turned out for you... "[I]the Fs is the value for their peak responce[/I]". Nice little jewel of information that was. Lastly, your sentenses would make more sence, and people might take your responces more seriously, if you were to work on enhansing your spelling skillses. In conclusion, we do still agree that your mom's trunk bangs. (yes helo, Im implying Ive had anal secks with her, big time) [/QUOTE]

Verification