Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 3425679" data-attributes="member: 549629">Are you kidding me? This entire thing has been over me, and a few tohers, telling you that you cant make generalized statements about speakers based upon diameter. Now you want to say you are arguing that it depends on the sub. I guess you think that if some time in the middle of the arguement you jump ships, nobody will notice? I noticed. You fail.Lastly, I do not believe Ive ever made the arguement that an array of 8&#039;s is superior to a single 10 (or fewer 10&#039;s). What I HAVE said is that an array of 8&#039;s is not intrinsically inferior to a single 10 (or fewer 10&#039;s). Your inability to grasp my point has lead us to this... a crossroads where your logic twists around so much it interesects with the logic of the people you are arguing with. Wait another page or two, your logic will twist back the other way and you&#039;ll be stating how instrinsically bad 8&#039;s are again.lawl</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 3425679, member: 549629"] Are you kidding me? This entire thing has been over me, and a few tohers, telling you that you cant make generalized statements about speakers based upon diameter. Now you want to say you are arguing that it depends on the sub. I guess you think that if some time in the middle of the arguement you jump ships, nobody will notice? I noticed. You fail. Lastly, I do not believe Ive ever made the arguement that an array of 8's is superior to a single 10 (or fewer 10's). What I HAVE said is that an array of 8's is not intrinsically inferior to a single 10 (or fewer 10's). Your inability to grasp my point has lead us to this... a crossroads where your logic twists around so much it interesects with the logic of the people you are arguing with. Wait another page or two, your logic will twist back the other way and you'll be stating how instrinsically bad 8's are again. lawl [/QUOTE]

Verification