Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="a_steezy" data-source="post: 4339004" data-attributes="member: 589140">i guess you&#039;re right, but then why would people put the rms to the subs???i mean looking at that why buy an amp putting out 1886??? when you could go half and have 1 db less??? why are people putting 5,000 watts to subs, when you could go 2,000 and not be able to hear a difference?doesn&#039;t make sense to mebut then to the box...sealed for both, each is reconmended 1-4.6^3 ft.and ported 1.75-2.25just read the reconmended...and if you want to fight the website, both the subs have same dimensions.idk, i&#039;m over this topic, it&#039;s the 95blazer dudes post, and it&#039;s his call, his money, etc. i just personally if i were to buy dual 12&quot; cvx&#039;s i would buy a zx1500.1and dual cvr&#039;s, i would go with the zx750.1 and match up what needs to be matched up</blockquote>

[QUOTE="a_steezy, post: 4339004, member: 589140"] i guess you're right, but then why would people put the rms to the subs??? i mean looking at that why buy an amp putting out 1886??? when you could go half and have 1 db less??? why are people putting 5,000 watts to subs, when you could go 2,000 and not be able to hear a difference? doesn't make sense to me but then to the box... sealed for both, each is reconmended 1-4.6^3 ft. and ported 1.75-2.25 just read the reconmended... and if you want to fight the website, both the subs have same dimensions. idk, i'm over this topic, it's the 95blazer dudes post, and it's his call, his money, etc. i just personally if i were to buy dual 12" cvx's i would buy a zx1500.1 and dual cvr's, i would go with the zx750.1 and match up what needs to be matched up [/QUOTE]

Verification