Recent content by Type_X

  1. T

    SQ plus SPL?

    Ok guys...thanks for all the responses...the Brahma's and the new Kicker L7's seem to be my two choices for now. Like I stated in the beginning...was just a question I had while brainstorming one night what to do with a new setup. I came to the right place and got some good responses. No need...
  2. T

    SQ plus SPL?

    Yes...was just figuring out what to do with my setup...peeps like SQ (I do)..and others like SPL. Was just wondering if there was a way to have the best of both worlds....but if I have to make a choice..I will definitely go with SQ. TX
  3. T

    SQ plus SPL?

    Any thoughts if this might sound good at all? I have 2 Rockford TypeX amps for Subs...was thinking of running 1 amp for 1 sub on the SQ side. Would it be "ok" to have 1 amp for 2 SQ subs at 2 OHMs and the other for 2 SPL subs? Or is this overkill....thanks in advance. TX
  4. T

    Sub question

    Nice!! Thanks! was thinking of the CDT HD642 set...going all out with SQ here....have currently 3 Infinity amps in my PT..... 2 Beta Digital 100's running Kicker Comps up fron and back and 1 Beta Digital 300 bridged with 1 Kicker solobaric 12"..(I think), been awhile since I've been back there...
  5. T

    Sub question

    darnit..forgot to mention this up top....so you are saying that midbass is unnecessary or not necessary in this type of setup..? When if at all would MidB be appropriate? Please see past the NooB ignance...thanks. TX
  6. T

    Sub question

    Thanks guys...you just saved me some mula! TX
  7. T

    Sub question

    Apart from having say 2 12" subs...is there a benefit to having an additional 2 10" woofers for any musical "notes" to play that are between the 12's and the components? or is that just a no-no or no difference..thanks! TX
Top