Recent content by Savant

Cold Fusion.. Not that I'd expect you to understand that.. Anyway.. it's been MANY weeks now, the US PROMISED we KNEW about WMD, Chem/Bio weapons, but NOW our only response is "um. maybe they moved TONS of stuff across borders without our noticing".. nevermind that our spy sattelites can read...

Almost missed this one.. Actually, the article does NOT contradict it's self, it shows everyone here how you can't comprehend what you read, and instead of trying to see why you thoght something didn't make sense (you thought there was a contradiction, you didn't bother to clarify if it was or...

Yet, it's ok for the US to say they can't divulge their sources from Iraq cause they are affraid that those sources will be killed.. yet we are now in a conflict and removing Saddam and his troops so the lives of the informants aren't in danger.. Hmm.. Odd, we say we are protecting them from...

Here.. I found your post a few pages back about how far the missle supposedly went.. So, YOU brought up KM.. not miles.. NOT ME.. *shrug* Though, I was pretty sure CNN was talking about 60-ish miles.. still trying to find a report on that since all CNN has now is the seersucker missle thingy..

Um.. not doublspeak.. maybe 'mispoken' based on my thinking KM.. you now say miles.. First off, you and I were discussing 102 KM.. not miles.. so if the range was 'miles' then yes, there is NO quesion it was NOT a silkworm.. problem is, it was called a silkworm initially, and the measurement...

I obviously have a much better grasp of the language than you do. I understand the definition and concept of 'fact' and 'proof', you obviously do NOT.. Hell, you started a thead on March 20th (Out of curiosity) .. 22 days BEFORE any 'proof' MIGHT actually have been found. The warheads are pretty...

I wonder if one could use them for large scale bug spraying.. though, I really would have to immagine that crop dusters are a much better alternative.. As for what else they could be used for, I have no idea.. The question wasn't what would I use them for, it's would I have them.. and the only...

Actually, politics generally supecede everything else.. just because Saddam is a bad man doesn't mean people (countries) won't do business with them.. hell, politicians in the US deal with bad people, and bad countries all the time.. they just try to keep it quiet.. India getting oil from Iraq...

Again, you are totally missing the point.. It seems in your tiny little locked up mind you think I believe we should have just walked away.. I have NEVER said that, nor do I think that would have been smart.. Yet, you can't seem to get that into your vaccuous skull.. My contention is that since...

would you PLEASE grow up.. The MAJORITY of this country supports this war.. so? and if the leader of that union want's to support the war that's fine, and if some of the members do too, great.. then they can say their 'union supports the war'.. that's not quite the same as of the biggest and...

Guess who HAS though, the U.S.... so.. um.. should the world remove them from us? Oh, wait, we have too many nukes for anyone to tell us anything.. power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.. By the way, what are we classifying as WMD? I thought that was pretty much Nukes.. since...

This was on foxnews.com today.. "It was suspected that the truck may have been a mobile biological weapons lab. However, on Friday the Army said that specific vehicle was deemed not to be such a lab, but that the seven to 15 others discovered on the site are still being investigated." Can you...

So, now all of a sudden, a week or so after the fact, they 'know' the missle was launched over 150 Km when the initial guess was 102 Km at most? Hmm.. and they couldn't have moved the missles/launchers at any point.. Ok.. I'll give you they may have found missles and launchers beyond the range...

Here are some more things to think about.. " In 1973, Iraq nationalised all oil companies. By displacing Saddam Hussein and installing a friendly regime, U.S. and British companies would be able to re-enter the country and get a major share of its oil industry." " Sources said control over...

To a certian degree I'll agree with this.. The past is a very good indicator of what might come.. and it should be looked at to find warning signs.. And I believe we did that in 91 when we helped Kuwait get rid of the invading Saddam and Iraq.. That still doesn't mean we needed to go in guns...