Recent content by Ctesibius

Audiolife is and has been long time friends with Pat @ Kinetik.

He keeps things entertaining.

Okay, this time I am seriously exiting the thread. And just to make my life easier, Alcoholic is going on the ignore list.

Unfortunately for you, my understanding of speaker physics would trump yours. Your futile attempts to argue your way out of your hole have failed. You are, indeed, both a hypocrite and a liar. And yet you refuse to acknowledge that I have no confusion on the topic, but instead you are...

Interesting, so your off-topic irrelevant comments make you a hypocrite. Thank you. That's what I wanted to know. Though you are also a liar as it's pretty easy to see by the chronology and content of the postings that your post was infact a direct response to mine.....but you're not ready to...

Sorry, felt compelled to respond to this. And again, you avoid the question at hand. Either YOU went completely off-topic about irrelevant nonsense by making your post about power handling, thus making you a hypocrite. Or, you lied about your post not being a direct response to my post. Thus...

And with that, I am exiting this thread as I've had to (yet again) restate the exact same statements to audioholic in several different posts and he still refuses to accept the truth due to his inability to view himself as being wrong. As indicated by his unwillingness to answer my question as...

I don't know about my skull as I've never tested it, but every salon I go to has told me I have extremely thick hair Again, no mistake in need of admittance. Um, no. It was directly related to the discussion I was having at the moment relating to the inefficiency of increasing power as...

Minus points for not answering the clearly stated questions. Minus points for avoiding questions which point out your obvious flaws. Minus points for having obvious flaws in your argument. It appears you avoid questions when they exploit the obvious flaws in your logic and demonstrate your...

Apparently not difficult to accomplish. Again, I will tell you that that was an example, and the overall point was targeted at those who determine "best" based on power handling. Thus my initial comment was; Power handling/output =/= highest output If this extremely simple, extremely...

Although if you stopped reading at line 1, I would be entertained to hear your response to this; What is even more entertaining, is that you pretend that I somehow brought the conversation completely off topic, when in the post directly following mine (which you claim was in no way related to...

Again, you're ultimate confusion of the entire thread. My comments; Power handling/output =/= highest output This simple concept of me commenting on posts within the thread, completely eludes you still. 3 pages of debates about something you ultimately don't disagree with, simply because you...

Really? Because if you read, I haven't twisted a single thing. I corrected the points in which you tried to twist my words and motives, such as we will see below and we have already seen above. I did infact say increasing power was the least efficient means of increasing output, and at one...

Thank you for somebody understanding my point.

Audioholic; I edited the above post to add an "]" after a "[/quote" that I had missed, since apparently I need to okay all of my edits with you or else they will be taken out of context and twisted for your use Please let me know if this edit is okay and will not be misconstrued by you in a...