Current events discussion

***** fat pisses me off. If I posted a graph of my cholesterol numbers, you can see the numbers improve when ***** fat went off the market temporarily. And "they" let ***** fat back on the market despite the fact that heart disease is the number 1 health problem in the US.
Most of the food available will cause health problems...even in moderation
 
If people would treat gender dypshoria as a mental illness instead of promoting the mental illness, shit like this could be much more avoided:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...eing-*****-i-wish-i-never-brain-washed-myself

Everybody has just gone retarded

****** had "sponsored by blackrock" on one of the magazines 👀
This is clear satanic imagery, so this is a war on Christians by satanists and satanic influnce:


IMG_9316.jpeg
IMG_9317.jpeg
 
You can't stop people from eating shitty poisonous fake food, because then how is big pharma going to have any sick people to treat? If you take away the food that's making everyone sick and obese, you're gonna take away most of big pharma profits. Even worse is you'd give people self empowerment and we can't have the average person empowered, then the gov couldn't control them with their illnesses...
It's nuts. Obviously, I question your world views, but sometimes you look at shyt like this and it does look like some malevolent force is behind it all. :oops:
 
It's nuts. Obviously, I question your world views, but sometimes you look at shyt like this and it does look like some malevolent force is behind it all. :oops:
That's because there is and always has been. The story in the Bible of the garden of Eden comes from the oldest written languages ever found basically, at least the oldest where there's a full set of history basically. But the part of the story from a biblical perspective, where there's a snake in the garden trying to influence humanity in different directions, that's still what it is. There's been a war for the direction of humanity by non human forces since the beginning and really since before the beginning of humanity. Much existed before humanity ever did, idk how long it's going to take for people to figure that out. Waking up is hard
 
Last edited:
It's a fact that you have no clue how to use the word ironic or what it is to quote something verbatim.
Yet another grammar hill you choose to die on, over and over.

And then you try to sub the word "iconic", and use THAT one incorrectly.
It's like you get some weird thrill from showing us all how poor your education was.

"how to use the word ironic or what" - Thxone

A VERBATIM quote.

What's IRONIC is that you make claims I don't know the meanings of words, when you very clearly show that YOU are the one who doesn't understand words.

The IRONY being that it is not expected for a person to comment with authority on something they have demonstrated they know nothing about.

A shining example:
"Verbatim you will include EVERY SINGLE WORD FROM THE ORIGINAL." -Thxone

"Here is the Verbatim quote of this line -
"Now will I question Cassio of Bianca, A huswife that by selling her desires Buys herself bread and clothes." - Shakespeare Act 4 Scene 1" - Thxone


Pure contradiction of your own words.

Ironic.
 
I fail to see your proof that any definition ANYWHERE says a quote must include every single word from the source, despite your claims that it does.
You won't find that claim and I never made that claim. So what does that tell you? It tells you that you are confused and have got something wrong.
I also take note that you contradicted your own self-created definition by providing a quote from Othello that was literally just one sentence. And you properly described it as verbatim. And that you were unable to reconcile the contradiction.
It is the WHOLE sentence. The fact that it is the WHOLE sentence is what makes it VERBATIM.
I also note that you cannot show ANY reference that says a quote must be sentence-for-sentence, paragraph-for-paragraph, chapter-for-chapter.
You won't and I never made that claim.
It is clear that you are confused and or that you think a quote and a verbatim quote are the same thing.
The definition YOU shared indicates it is word-for-word.
Every definition in every dictionary says verbatim means word-for-word.
Yet you fail to comprehend what that means.
It's really odd that you keep giving us evidence that you think proves us wrong, then when the contradiction is pointed out, you state the evidence you provided is wrong.
I have PROVED you wrong. Your ego is preventing you from learning.
"When You Must Cite
Although you should use sources creatively and flexibly to help you generate ideas and sharpen your argument, there are some hard-and-fast rules about when and how some sources should be acknowledged in your project.
1. When you quote two or more words verbatim, or even one word if it is used in a way that is unique to the source"

Wait. How can ONE word POSSIBLY be verbatim, when (by your self-created rule) a verbatim quote must " include EVERY SINGLE WORD FROM THE ORIGINAL"?
How can they deny the infinite expertise of Michael the linguist, and teach such gibberish to all those students?!?!
If all the person said was one word and you quote that one word you have a verbatim quote. It is not as hard as you are forcing it to be for yourself.
 
I think America should mimic the food habits of whatever countries have the healthiest, fittest people.

Have you heard of the 5 blue zones? And no I’m not talking about robs echo chamber😂😂
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,862
Views
467,529
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top