You don't really have any innate rights or we all wouldn't have different rights. Innate rights are just a stupid thought exercise for the pretensious idiots in their ivory towers to pontificate upon as they look down on the rest of us who choose to live in reality.Innate human right to walk freely through the woods.
This right taken away by a Canadian Government.
At least Rob didn't use a self defense argument to prove humans always had the right to bears arms as written in 2A...I rally frigging hate the self defense or hunting justification for the secondYou don't really have any innate rights or we all wouldn't have different rights. Innate rights are just a stupid thought exercise for the pretensious idiots in their ivory towers to pontificate upon as they look down on the rest of us who choose to live in reality.
How could I contradcit myself when this is the first time in this convo that I explained to you what an example is?The point I literally just made and you respond by contradicting yourself while making my point.
Repetition is useful for slow learners like you. Kind of like a pavlovian thingAwe whats the matter? Did I hurt you again? Why the ignorant reference to the old buffalo wings caterer bullshit that nobody paid attention to but that you think won you some kind of trophy?
Oh? Then why did you infer there was no right to bear arms before firearms were invented?Not at all smart ***.
WHo knows? The first written mention of it was over 3,700 years ago.I tell you what then Mr. self proclaimed master of everything. Tell me when the concept of human rights came to be.
Save yourself a lot of meaningless typing.You don't really have any innate rights or we all wouldn't have different rights. Innate rights are just a stupid thought exercise for the pretensious idiots in their ivory towers to pontificate upon as they look down on the rest of us who choose to live in reality.
Dissertation, please.You don't really have any innate rights or we all wouldn't have different rights. Innate rights are just a stupid thought exercise for the pretensious idiots in their ivory towers to pontificate upon as they look down on the rest of us who choose to live in reality.
So you use a governing body's granting of rights to argue that governments can't grant rightsDissertation, please.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 (General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages. The UDHR is widely recognized as having inspired, and paved the way for, the adoption of more than seventy human rights treaties, applied today on a permanent basis at global and regional levels (all containing references to it in their preambles).![]()
Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations
A milestone document in the history of human rights, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected. It has been translated into over 500 languages.www.un.org
So when did the government grant MEN the right to vote?Notice Rob has ignored the women's right to vote that I posted as rights given by government as well as the right to freedom when they ratified the 13th amendment. Also a right granted by the government.
He used a government granting rights to prove his argument that rights dont come from government...if he's willing to do that he's too intellectually dishonest to acknowledge any merit in someone else's argument...Notice Rob has ignored the women's right to vote that I posted as rights given by government as well as the right to freedom when they ratified the 13th amendment. Also a right granted by the government.
The government was men.So when did the government grant MEN the right to vote?
Is our constitution in their country?And prior to the 13th, black peoiple had no right to be free?
What about in their own country, where they were free prior to being brought here?
You are being *** again because you have lost your argument.Your argument often defeat your arguments.
But if they had no right to vote, when did they get that right bestowed on them?The government was men.
Is theirs in ours?Is our constitution in their country?
Jimi seems to be having a tough time finding his dissertation. Where's yours? The one that has been accepted as completely reversing the UDOHR that was written and agreed upon 26 yeras before you were born, and things such as the Cyrus Cylinder, text of Hammuarbi, etc, that have existed for over 3,700 years before you were born?You are being *** again because you have lost your argument.