Current events discussion

Really? Where is the economic depression? That is one of the things that was said was going to happen. Where is it?
Explain the rebound on the chart YOU provided? Did Sleepy Joe somehow make that happen?
Funny thing is I remember a few months Rob ago posted EVERY economist was predicting tariffs wouldn't work, doom and gloom, etc. Seems he forgot what EVERY economist was predicting a few months ago. And it isn't Sleepy Joe, that causes too much confusion. Wrong Way Joe or Which Way Do I Go Joe are subject to less confusion because they are literal.
 
So EVERY economist was wrong??? They're reporting inflation at 2.7%, but I thought tariffs were supposed to get passed along to consumers. 2.7% is a normal rate of inflation, in line with 3% GDP growth and Fed targets.

So how can we explain tariffs + normal inflation? I've heard some suggest that manufacturers, exporters, importers, retailers, etc are absorbing the cost. This is something I suggested months ago, but I was clearly wrong because EVERY economist + Always Right Rob disagreed. We can dismiss this "absorbed cost theory" because tariffs are a tax and this would mean Trump taxed businesses. As we know Team Blue loves the idea of taxing businesses and would (without hesitation) support any policy that lead to taxation of business. Since Team Blue has not started singing the praises of tariffs, we can only conclude that businesses have not absorbed the cost of tariffs/taxes. Plus Always Right Rob & EVERY economist told us the tariffs would get passed thru to consumers.

So what happened to the tariffs??? I think the Evil Orange Guy is printing money and "pre-paying" the tariffs to hide the cost from the public. Anybody else have any theories????🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
Last edited:
This has got to piss Team Blue off. So much for all that dictator, King, etc talk. Maybe Trump should run, then bow out at the last second like Biden did. That way he could save Vance the cost & potential pitfalls of the primary process. Worked for Kamala. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 
As soon as you tell me where you came up with this "list of some of the thousands of lies told by the liberal media" crap.
YOU are the one who claimed it's 90% of what they say. Did you forget?

queer​

1 of 3

adjective

ˈkwir
queerer; queerest
Synonyms of queer

1a : differing in some way from what is usual or normal : odd, strange, weird
Yeah, and that's the way YOU use the word, especially with your hundreds of posts about male gay ***.
Got it.

Again Dementia Rob, these are the dumb thoughts you come up with all on your own.
So it wasn't you who talked about how criminals are forced to suffer the punishment they chose to receive when they chose to commit a crime?
OK. 'Must have been that other Thxone in the group.
 
Rights being given and being denied are one in the same - again see Roe v Wade. Who gave women the right to murder fetuses in the name of privacy - the gov't. Who took away this right - the gov't.
"murder a *****". Interesting convolution of ideas there.

Religion is a little more complicated because parents could be involved in that in a nation with religious freedom.
You think parents bestow the right of whether you believe in a god or a religion, or not?
Without your parents bestowing this right on you, you would not be able to believe in what you choose to believe?
Sounds like mind control.

Even then as an extreme example, you don't have the right to be part of a Murderous Death Cult in the US - at least not if you're murdering/sacrificing people. That is unless that Murderous Death Cult is Pro-Choice Feminism - in that case kill away ladies, kill away.
You have the right to be in that cult, but that doesn't absolve you of the possibility you will be punished if laws are broken.
You have the right to shout "fire" in a crowded movie theater, but that doesn't absolve you of possible punishment for disturbing the peace, causing a panic stampede, etc.
You have the right to self-sustenance.

Human rights are innate, not granted or bestowed upon us.
That's a very basic concept that has been understood for centuries, with known references dating 17 centuries B.C.

But if you want to be like Thxone, and argue that the concept is false and has been misunderstood by everyone (scholar and layman alike) for at least 2,700 years, who am I to stop you?
Go ahead and explain how the concept is false, and why.
 
Funny thing is I remember a few months Rob ago posted EVERY economist was predicting tariffs wouldn't work, doom and gloom, etc. Seems he forgot what EVERY economist was predicting a few months ago. And it isn't Sleepy Joe, that causes too much confusion. Wrong Way Joe or Which Way Do I Go Joe are subject to less confusion because they are literal.
Incorrect. I posted that EVERY economist attributed the April markets decline directly to Trump's announcement of his dumbass tariff idea, that he got from that fraud Navarro.

What does Biden have to do with Trump's shitty economics policy?
Is it his fault that Trump has no clue what he's doing?
 
YOU are the one who claimed it's 90% of what they say. Did you forget?
Is that a list? Nope.
Yeah, and that's the way YOU use the word, especially with your hundreds of posts about male gay ***.
Got it.
YOU are the one who turns it into a homosexual thing. That's on you buddy.
So it wasn't you who talked about how criminals are forced to suffer the punishment they chose to receive when they chose to commit a crime?
OK. 'Must have been that other Thxone in the group.
It was you actually who worded and phrased things that way. Perhaps your memory is full.
 
Because the words peace and peaceful as well as peacefully get censored by the liberal media so @RobGMN has probably never heard Trump saying this.


You think the liberal media is capable of censoring the internet?
The full transcript of his speech is available simply by searching the words TRUMP TRASNCRIPT JAN 6

In fact, the very FIRST result is by that leftist liberal group of lunatics known as NPR:
1754411663551.png


Are you only capable of watching a YouTube video that tells you what to think?

And here's an interesting tidbit:

1754411806516.png


"An original script for Donald Trump’s speech the day after the Capitol insurrection included tough talk ordering the Justice Department to “ensure all lawbreakers are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law” and stating the rioters “do not represent me.” But those words were crossed out with thick black lines, apparently by Trump, according to exhibits released by House investigators."

Now, WHY would Trump not want to say the scumbags would be prosecuted fully, and that they do not represent him?
Worried about the optics of going against his voters?
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,932
Views
482,658
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top