Current events discussion

So, free speech is off the table, now?
Good to know.

Maybe he can sue me:
Cybertrucks are complete and utter garbage, The name "WankPanzer" couldn't be any more appropriate for these rolling pieces of trash, bought and driven by morons who believed all the bullshit hype , propaganda, and flat-out lies about their quality.
They have been shit from day one.

I'll wait for the cease and desist letter from wanker himself.
EDS & TDS is really fawking with your reading comprehension. "We" refer to acts of violence (aka firebombing Tesla dealerships/chargers) as domestic terrorism, but to you that somehow means "spray painting Teslas is domestic terrorism." I say Elon should/could sue for slander & defamation and somehow you conclude that means restrict free speech and that calling CyberTrucks junk would fall under slander and defamation.

Rather than posting so much, you should take a little bit of time to calm down and think about what you want to post before going keyboard commando.
 
The stupid thing is coming to the table to debate literally everything.
And yet here you are, debating everything I post.
Round and Round.

That is not what that means. It is not what I meant. You left out context and 1 word to make it look the way you wanted it to look. You think you are entitled to change peoples words to fit your narrative.
Round and Round.
OK, So, WHOSE averages were you talking about?
Trump spoke. He said many things. None of them were what I asked you to share. Because he never said it. People were at the Capitol Building. Instigators were there and the events of Jan 6th unfolded from there. Trump said Peacefully and Patriotically.
Round and Round.
He never said the things I quoted verbatim? OK...
Not at all. Why do you ask?
You thought I was asking a question? Quite the error for the guy who claims his comprehension skills are so strong.
1743199099320.png

It kills you when you don't have the answers huh?
So did you or did you not write all the texts that you had to cite when you wrote papers in what you claim was a college education?
Did you or did not build all the equipment used in scooping dirt samples and inaccurately analyzing them?
Did you re-create the science of microbiology in order to not quote the words of anyone who did it previously?
So learn to have a conversation. Know that you are not in control of the conversation. Realize that nobody has to prove anything to you. You either accept what they have to say or you don't.
So you don't understand how debate works. Got it.
No, that was your confusion and I told you that the first time you argues about it.
Round and Round.
My "confusion"? As always, you don't even remember your own posts.
1743199371895.png



Sure.

Why, you don't answer MY question. No need to answer yours.
Round and Round.
I answered it, and included a lot of information to support the answer. Like grownups do.
And as usual, YOUR answer is "because I said so", instead of a quote of Biden telling people to cross the border illegally.

No, that is what the left wants it to mean so they can continue to do what the left does.
Round and Round.
So he distinctly separates the word "fight" from the word "primary", but they are the same thing?
Then, why did he talk about them as two distinct things?

When you go tot he poll to vote, do you say "I'm going to fight like hell tonight"?
When you put a Trump sign on your lawn, did you call it "fighting like hell"?
When you put on your MAGAT hat and hung the Trump 2020 flag on your flagpole in 2022, was it a "fight like hell" moment?
How about the Trump Pence bumpersticker on your Ford? "Fighting like hell"?
Well you have your opinion and interpretation of the speech. Clearly FAR left leaning. Congrats.
Yeah. FAR left.
If the right thinks that waving a flag and wearing a hat is "fighting like hell", I hope with all my heart that none of the idiots are in our military.
We're bound to get our *** kicked with stupid notions like that.

Imagine going up against a guy with an AK-12 and thinking you'll win by wearing a hat and waving a flag at him. BOO! And he surrenders,
Moronic.
 
And yet here you are, debating everything I post.
This isn't a debate it is an asinine argument that your ego wont let go of.
OK, So, WHOSE averages were you talking about?
What word did you purposely leave off "the verbatim quote" and there is your answer.
He never said the things I quoted verbatim? OK...

You thought I was asking a question? Quite the error for the guy who claims his comprehension skills are so strong.
View attachment 64238
I don't ask YOU for information about DOGE.
So did you or did you not write all the texts that you had to cite when you wrote papers in what you claim was a college education?
Did you or did not build all the equipment used in scooping dirt samples and inaccurately analyzing them?
Did you re-create the science of microbiology in order to not quote the words of anyone who did it previously?
We had this talk about your condescension.
So you don't understand how debate works. Got it.
Apparently not.
My "confusion"? As always, you don't even remember your own posts.
View attachment 64239
Round and round. I showed you the correct way he spoke with commas and you tried to use the Closed Captions lack of punctuation to argue your agenda.
I answered it, and included a lot of information to support the answer. Like grownups do.
And as usual, YOUR answer is "because I said so", instead of a quote of Biden telling people to cross the border illegally.
Like grown ups do. Do you not see the way you talk to people? You are that guy I would enjoy burying my thumbs in your eyes all the way to the trapezium bone out of pure frustration at trying to have a "grown up" conversation with you.
So he distinctly separates the word "fight" from the word "primary", but they are the same thing?
Then, why did he talk about them as two distinct things?
You can't have a rational conversation about this until you learn that the word FIGHT doesn't only mean a physical act. However, as long as you are a party voter you will never learn.
When you go tot he poll to vote, do you say "I'm going to fight like hell tonight"?
When you put a Trump sign on your lawn, did you call it "fighting like hell"?
When you put on your MAGAT hat and hung the Trump 2020 flag on your flagpole in 2022, was it a "fight like hell" moment?
How about the Trump Pence bumpersticker on your Ford? "Fighting like hell"?
Wow so your theory is that if it isn't used in every day language that it doesn't have more than one use? That's a narrow way to think.
Yeah. FAR left.
If the right thinks that waving a flag and wearing a hat is "fighting like hell", I hope with all my heart that none of the idiots are in our military.
No, but men who call themselves women or women who call themselves men is A Ok with you huh? "There are no chicks with dicks, only dudes with tits". - Ted
We're bound to get our *** kicked with stupid notions like that.
The right are peaceful people.
Imagine going up against a guy with an AK-12 and thinking you'll win by wearing a hat and waving a flag at him. BOO! And he surrenders,
Moronic.
Nah we will just send some of your army to fight them. I am sure a bunch of men in Daisy Dukes and shirts tied in a front knot offering blowjobs will slow them down.
 
LOL... Why are you having such a hard time understanding what you are type and I am typing? I never said the money was approved. I only stated that Biden asked his people to see what they can get for $400 million. I never said the money was approved and that Biden asked for the trucks to be Cyber Trucks. Stop trying to put words in my mouth.

Also, please show proof that Trump's admin tried to sneak the deal in. That's just another liberal lie to get you all fired up.

See below. Just because you bought into the propaganda.....doesn't mean everyone has.


Again, your trying to put words in my mouth. I know it is a liberal thing, but you really need to stop. Let me quote EXACTLY what I said. I said, "... how much the crime has stopped." There's a difference. How much it has stopped doesn't mean it has all stopped. It's just saying that some has stopped. If you need me to explain how that works, let me know.

It's not my fault that you post stupid things such as:

Old_Slapper said:
I bet you are really hating that people are walking the streets and pointing out how much the crime has stopped

and then get upset and fragile when you are mocked over the stupid thing you posted. Stop posting random garbage that you make up on the spot.....and I'll stop pointing and laughing at you.
 
This isn't a debate it is an asinine argument that your ego wont let go of.
And yet, here you are.
What word did you purposely leave off "the verbatim quote" and there is your answer.
Averages don't belong to me. They are a mathematical equation.
And the quote is indeed verbatim. Your inability to comprehend the meaning of the word is your persoanl problem. It doesn't alter the facts.
I don't ask YOU for information about DOGE.
Right. You claim to ask for "details and context", except when Trump or Musk tell you what to think.

We had this talk about your condescension.
Dodging the questions, as usual.
So I guess you used references created by others, methods created by others, equipment created by others.
But no on else should. Nice entitlement.
Apparently not.

Round and round. I showed you the correct way he spoke with commas and you tried to use the Closed Captions lack of punctuation to argue your agenda.
You "showed me the correct way", which is different from the official transcript.
I guess you know better than the people who transcribed it, huh?
Oh yeah, what makes THEM any more of an expert than you, right?
All of those years you spent as a transcriptionist paid off.
Like grown ups do. Do you not see the way you talk to people? You are that guy I would enjoy burying my thumbs in your eyes all the way to the trapezium bone out of pure frustration at trying to have a "grown up" conversation with you.
So because you can't handle convo on an intellectual level, you strike out with violence.
Childish.
You can't have a rational conversation about this until you learn that the word FIGHT doesn't only mean a physical act. However, as long as you are a party voter you will never learn.
He distinguished it very clearly from the non-physical act of voting to effect change.
Did you forget that?

Wow so your theory is that if it isn't used in every day language that it doesn't have more than one use? That's a narrow way to think.
You tried to play word games with that whole stupidass argument about how in medical science they used the word "in" wrong, and have been doing so for a century or more, just to make it easier for the unwashed masses to understand.

Now you're going to say that everyone knows the words "fight like hell" mean to wear hats and wave flags?
When the coach tells the football team to "fight like hell" on the field, he means to wear helmets and wave jerseys?

Your attempts to defend Trump for what he said are pathetic at best.

No, but men who call themselves women or women who call themselves men is A Ok with you huh? "There are no chicks with dicks, only dudes with tits". - Ted
I'm not sure how ***** people factor into your defense of Trump and the shitheels who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6th.
Or are you just trying to spin off on something else that bothers you on a daily basis, even though it impacts your life in no way at all? Or does it? Did someone play a trick on you?

The right are peaceful people.
Obviously. Peaceful people always erect a gallows at the Capitol after their Dear Leader loses an election. It's a happy celebration that they participate in. Along with an egg toss.
1743209371537.png


Nah we will just send some of your army to fight them. I am sure a bunch of men in Daisy Dukes and shirts tied in a front knot offering blowjobs will slow them down.
Back to your fantasies again.
Funny how it seems to be all the right-wingers that are getting busted doing the gay stuff, though. Especially the right-wingers constantly screaming their anti-gay rhetoric.

1743208787270.png

1743208871040.png


1743208851592.png


1743208931294.png

1743208959173.png

1743208988212.png

1743209094474.png

1743209113625.png
 

Attachments

  • 1743209342049.png
    1743209342049.png
    19.1 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
What leads you to conclude that he is writing the checks to people who voted GOP?
How many Democrats go to Trump rallys?
How many Democrats are supporting Musk?

Oh, by the way: Wisconsin has a bribery law that says it's illegal to offer "anything of value" to induce them to vote or not vote in an election.

Are we going to call the law TDS and claim that a million bucks is not anything of value?

12.11 Election bribery.
(1) In this section, “anything of value” includes any amount of money, or any object which has utility independent of any political message it contains and the value of which exceeds $1. The prohibitions of this section apply to the distribution of material printed at public expense and available for free distribution if such materials are accompanied by a political message.
12.11(1m)(1m) Any person who does any of the following violates this chapter:
(a) Offers, gives, lends or promises to give or lend, or endeavors to procure, anything of value, or any office or employment or any privilege or immunity to, or for, any elector, or to or for any other person, in order to induce any elector to:
1. Go to or refrain from going to the polls.
 
Last edited:
EDS & TDS is really fawking with your reading comprehension. "We" refer to acts of violence (aka firebombing Tesla dealerships/chargers) as domestic terrorism, but to you that somehow means "spray painting Teslas is domestic terrorism." I say Elon should/could sue for slander & defamation and somehow you conclude that means restrict free speech and that calling CyberTrucks junk would fall under slander and defamation.

Rather than posting so much, you should take a little bit of time to calm down and think about what you want to post before going keyboard commando.
1743209696036.png


But Trump should not be found guilty for falsifying business accounts in the 1st degree on 34 separate occasions. Each time, a felony.

Isn't it funny how every time yet another failure of Trump's is pointed out, it must be a case of "Trump Derangement Syndrome"?
Because there's no POSSIBLE way Trump could ever do anything wrong. Correct?

He's just misunderstood and falsely vilified by the mean left with their TDS.
100% innocent, and only here because he cares about America.
Right?
 
Last edited:
And yet, here you are.
Yes, here I am.
Averages don't belong to me. They are a mathematical equation.
And the quote is indeed verbatim. Your inability to comprehend the meaning of the word is your persoanl problem. It doesn't alter the facts.
Right. Even after we showed you that your use of the word is wrong. But, ok.
Right. You claim to ask for "details and context", except when Trump or Musk tell you what to think.
When I need them, I ask.
Dodging the questions, as usual.
So I guess you used references created by others, methods created by others, equipment created by others.
But no on else should. Nice entitlement.
You kept asking me over and over just so you could make this statement. Wow.
You "showed me the correct way", which is different from the official transcript.
I guess you know better than the people who transcribed it, huh?
Oh yeah, what makes THEM any more of an expert than you, right?
All of those years you spent as a transcriptionist paid off.
Clearly they were wrong.
So because you can't handle convo on an intellectual level, you strike out with violence.
Childish.
Not at all. You are just one of those people that it's ok that violent things happen to. What's the phrase... ahh, you deserve it.
He distinguished it very clearly from the non-physical act of voting to effect change.
Did you forget that?


You tried to play word games with that whole stupidass argument about how in medical science they used the word "in" wrong, and have been doing so for a century or more, just to make it easier for the unwashed masses to understand.

Now you're going to say that everyone knows the words "fight like hell" mean to wear hats and wave flags?
When the coach tells the football team to "fight like hell" on the field, he means to wear helmets and wave jerseys?

Your attempts to defend Trump for what he said are pathetic at best.


I'm not sure how ***** people factor into your defense of Trump and the shitheels who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6th.
Or are you just trying to spin off on something else that bothers you on a daily basis, even though it impacts your life in no way at all? Or does it? Did someone play a trick on you?


Obviously. Peaceful people always erect a gallows at the Capitol after their Dear Leader loses an election. It's a happy celebration that they participate in. Along with an egg toss.
View attachment 64249


Back to your fantasies again.
Funny how it seems to be all the right-wingers that are getting busted doing the gay stuff, though. Especially the right-wingers constantly screaming their anti-gay rhetoric.

View attachment 64240
View attachment 64242

View attachment 64241

View attachment 64243
View attachment 64244
View attachment 64245
View attachment 64246
View attachment 64247
Look at all this extra fluff. Nobody is going to read all this B.S. Rob.
 
Yes, here I am.

Right. Even after we showed you that your use of the word is wrong. But, ok.
"We"? You and the frog in your pocket showed me the definition of verbatim is wrong?
Are you schizophrenic, by chance?
When I need them, I ask.
So they are never needed when Trump says it.

You kept asking me over and over just so you could make this statement. Wow.
So you admit never answering the questions.
Clearly they were wrong
Of course they are. Otherwise YOU would be wrong. And a language expert such as yourself could never be wrong. Especially after McCarthy told you what to hear.
Not at all. You are just one of those people that it's ok that violent things happen to. What's the phrase... ahh, you deserve it.
So you're not bright enough to win an argument intellectually. You have to resort to violence when proved wrong.
Got it.
Look at all this extra fluff. Nobody is going to read all this B.S. Rob.
"All that B.S.". HAHAHAHAH
Yep. None of those right wingers who were so anti-gay were gay.
Except the ones busted doing get stuff with other gay people.
Minor detail, huh?
 
Last edited:
"We"? You and the frog in your pocket showed me the definition of verbatim is wrong?
Are you schizophrenic, by chance?
Yes, we.
So they are never needed when Trump says it.
Are you finally coming around with this statement? Or did you mess up and forget the ?
So you admit never answering the questions.
Did you see an answer?
Of course they are. Otherwise YOU would be wrong. And a language expert such as yourself could never be wrong. Especially after McCarthy told you what to hear.
You don't have to keep taking everything personal Rob.
So you're not bright enough to win an argument intellectually. You have to resort to violence when proved wrong.
Got it.
This is the second time you have said this exact same thing... come on, out with it. What is the witty response you are waiting to say?
"All that B.S.". HAHAHAHAH
Yep. None of those right wingers who were so anti-gay were gay.
Except the ones busted doing get stuff with other gay people.
Minor detail, huh?
Why are you bragging about posting gay stuff.....
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,716
Views
445,036
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top