Current events discussion

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Way to COMPLETELY miss the idea of misreporting information about a person, and being held liable for it.

Rob you still haven't shown me any other proof but a judge's opinion about the jury's decision...and you can't even show me a secondary source that backs up your feelings...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You think that's a definition?
Ohhhh, NOW we may be getting somewhere on this whole alternate definitions thing you seem fond of using.

Stop being stupid Rob. Stop making an argument out of everything. This is not your personal debating website. You are talking about (They) saying they are... What is the (They) that you speak of? Words? Go figure. You are telling me they are libelous, slanderous, and defamatory. You know, explaining to me that which I already know. I actually covered this already but you can't just stfu.

I can prove it and you simultaneously can't disprove it. That's where truth is.

I mention getting something shipped and it not being "in" the box, by your definition.
For no apparent reason other than your failure to understand what I meant, you bring up mailboxes.
I guess if I describe someone as retired, you'd ask if it was Pirelli or Yokohama?

Or any other kind of boxes right after mailboxes... I keep forgetting you are too ******* stupid to get any kind of sarcasm, too ******* stupid to comprehend anything, too ******* stupid not to take everything literal. Too ******* stupid.

If you said the type of dye and I knew that "deep mauve" was indeed the result, but you said "orange"? Yeah, I would call bullshit.
I call bullshit on what I know and can prove is bullshit.

See, stupid, just ******* stupid. You can't just shut up. You still had to keep running your mouth even after knowing I am right. You are a troll.

Cool. Show me all the memes created by right-wingers littering the internet about the audio tapes. The ones where Epstein described his friendship with Trump, and the exploits on the "Lolita Express".
Oh yeah, you won't. Because you think proof is unnecessary when you could rely on beliefs instead

I am not your ex-wife and I am not any child of yours to demand things from. If you want to see memes go play on Google till you pass out. I don't care what Epstein had to say about Trump. Trump is your President elect and you need to show some damn respect for him.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

This is not your personal debating website

Rob doesn't debate...he'd get smoked in a real debate...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Rob doesn't debate...he'd get smoked in a real debate...

Take the internet away from Rob and his IQ hits 13.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Pretty interesting vid

US drones mystery takes new twist as orbs seen 'at impossible altitude'

New video shot from an airliner flying into Newark casts doubt on official White House statement about New Jersey drone crisis

www.the-express.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

@RobGMN

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Cool. Show me all the memes created by right-wingers littering the internet about the audio tapes. The ones where Epstein described his friendship with Trump, and the exploits on the "Lolita Express".
Oh yeah, you won't. Because you think proof is unnecessary when you could rely on beliefs instead

What the Jeffrey Epstein documents say about Donald Trump

Soon after a federal court unsealed documents stemming from a lawsuit related to financier and registered *** offender J

www.politifact.com

I know, I know...ultra-maga outlet...

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

In case nobody's noticed...I intentionally avoid using conservative biased sites as reference

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Stop being stupid Rob. Stop making an argument out of everything.

Irony, exemplified.

This is not your personal debating website. You are talking about (They) saying they are... What is the (They) that you speak of? Words? Go figure. You are telling me they are libelous, slanderous, and defamatory. You know, explaining to me that which I already know. I actually covered this already but you can't just stfu.

You hate what happens in the "Trump being Trump" (ie "being an *******") thread, yet you can't stay away from it.

Or any other kind of boxes right after mailboxes... I keep forgetting you are too ******* stupid to get any kind of sarcasm, too ******* stupid to comprehend anything, too ******* stupid not to take everything literal. Too ******* stupid.

See, stupid, just ******* stupid. You can't just shut up. You still had to keep running your mouth even after knowing I am right. You are a troll.

Irony, exemplified.

I am not your ex-wife and I am not any child of yours to demand things from. If you want to see memes go play on Google till you pass out. I don't care what Epstein had to say about Trump. Trump is your President elect and you need to show some damn respect for him.

Ahhh, the "I don't need to prove anything; what I say is the truth" defense. Nice.

Trump lost ANY chance of respect I could possibly have for him long long ago. He's a ******. He's a felon. He's a misogynist. He's a ****** predator. He's a liar. He's garbage.
Let him sue me for saying that. We'll se who wins.

Take the internet away from Rob and his IQ hits 13.

You can't even figure out that bones have nerves in them WITH the biggest library in the world at your fingertips.
If you didn't have someone to house you and care for you, you'd probably be living on the street. A homeless shelter would have kicked you out long ago for being a ****.

Rob doesn't debate...he'd get smoked in a real debate...

Mmm hmmm. I managed to guess everything I've said and get it right every time. What are the odds?

Have you found that schematic yet? The one that shows a mono amplifier circuit with multiple outputs?
Didn't think so.
Have you found the modified decision for that court case where the judge said Trump is a ****** yet?
Didn't think so.
Have you been able to dispute even ONE lie that is in that database of Trump's lies yet? How about the list of his lies in the Toronto Star? Maybe the ones he got fact-checked on during the debate? Shown how they are "propaganda"?
Didn't think so.
His 34-count felony conviction. Proved it's not legitimate yet?
Didn't think so.
Proof that new 25% tariffs will stop drugs from coming into the country? Proof that tariffs stopped them before?
Didn't think so.
Proof the president doesn't have the power to choose a vehicle that he rides in?
Didn't think so.
Here, prove to me that this is just "propaganda":

So much for your ability to debate, huh?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Former F-18 Pilot Tells Joe Rogan Drones Aren't WMD 'Sniffers' As Dronegate Intensifies | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

@RobGMN

Planes, stars, toys.

The usual stuff that the House Intelligence Committee gets classified briefings on...

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Cali folks started the WA decline back in the 90's...moved out of Cali then voted for the shit that they were trying to get away from

Cali folks are responsible for a lot of the decline in Colorado too.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Rob you still haven't shown me any other proof but a judge's opinion about the jury's decision...and you can't even show me a secondary source that backs up your feelings...

I think there are only two sources for Trump being liable for **** - Rob and the judge. The jury certainly didn't think Trump was liable for ****.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I think there are only two sources for Trump being liable for **** - Rob and the judge. The jury certainly didn't think Trump was liable for ****.

I'm not a source, any more than I'm a source that says Trump was convicted on 34 counts in the hush money trial, or any more than I'm a source that says gravity exists.
The court decision is the source in the felony conviction, the same as the court decision is the source that says he ***** E Jean Carroll.

Unlike other people here, I don't make claims and simply demand they be accepted as true. I back it up.

if you choose not to believe a court decision that is on record actually exists, that's on you.
But tell me: Why hasn't he sued the judge for saying it? Don't you think something like that is damaging? Moreso than a TV talking head saying he was found liable for it?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Mmm hmmm. I managed to guess everything I've said and get it right every time. What are the odds?

So you believe you know something EVERY media outlet doesn't...