Current events discussion

So you just comment in order to be a troll. Got it.
That must be it. What is the saying? It takes one to call one out right?
They are libelous, slanderous, and defamatory. Proof would be easy. Ask Spokey. He's using an example of a $15M arbitration settlement between Trump and ABC because the words George S. spoke hurt him.
I know what they are.
I guess Trump is mentally defective for filing suit for being hurt by words, huh?
So you elected a mentally defective person into office. Willingly.
Got it.
Some people have no problem how they get paid. If it is legal for him to get paid that way, more power to him. Doesn't change your sensitive thin skin though does it.
Simply repetition without due diligence to back up anything I repeat?
No, I leave that up to you, like your repetition of Trump's claim about import tariffs. No due diligence, no critical thinking. You simply repeat his incorrect and inaccurate talking point.
The only person repeating things over and over is you. The moment anyone has a difference of opinion with you the flood gates open for the next 10 pages of you repeating the same thing over and over and demanding this and that. You have been the most repetitious person on this forum since July 2021.
So you want to talk shit, but then whine and complain if I do the same? Interesting.
A coward is a man who hits women to show them he is powerful. You.
Can't you read? I said I don't care. They are just words. Talk all the shit you want. The more the better. In fact, make sure you use a new post each time. ;)
 
A lot of big tech people lean left, such as the left hand black magic path of Lucifer, manifesting the entity of ai as their dark savior, their Christ-like figure that will cure all ailing by removing humanity from humans 😈

"Epstein faced similar charges of *** trafficking and conspiracy charges, but unlike Combs, Epstein was accused of trafficking and engaging in *** acts with dozens of minors — some as young as 14."

 
My beliefs and opinions have absolutely ZERO effect on the words Trump has spoken that are on record in MANY formats (not just organized into a searchable database), nor on the judge's decision in the case E. Jean CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. Donald J. TRUMP, Defendant. 22-cv-10016
Yet you said this about Step saying Trump committed **** (as you yourself have)...
It was false or inaccurate.
 
Last edited:
You know what? I am the public and I can't wait. I want to know all there is to know about all the things kept from us by our government. Epstein, Kennedy, Area 51, COVID. I want to know it all!!! I hope Trump wasn't "lying" 😲 about letting the people know.

I hope it's not 30,001. lol
 
You know what? I am the public and I can't wait. I want to know all there is to know about all the things kept from us by our government. Epstein, Kennedy, Area 51, COVID. I want to know it all!!! I hope Trump wasn't "lying" 😲 about letting the people know.

I hope it's not 30,001. lol
Don't you dare say that's another lie that's another 4000 pages Rob hast to do to explain it to us.

Have you ever done any research into the secret space program?
 
Yet you said this about Step saying Trump committed **** (as you yourself have)...
It's funny how Rob will cry about Trump being a ****** instead of actually pointing out people like P Diddy and all of the connections there, and Epstein and Weinstein, and all of that stuff. Where is Rob on that? Where is Rob on the stuff that's provable and actually matters?
 
That must be it. What is the saying? It takes one to call one out right?
Ahhh, "the saying". The embodiment of scientific confirmation.
There is also a saying "you'll catch pneumonia if you go out on the cold".

I know what they are.
Huh? I wasn't asking if you did.
Some people have no problem how they get paid. If it is legal for him to get paid that way, more power to him. Doesn't change your sensitive thin skin though does it.
Huh? You said someone who is hurt by words is mentally defective. Trump sued ABC because he claims he was hurt by words.
What does that have to do with what affects ME. Was he suing on MY behalf? If so, I want my $15M

The only person repeating things over and over is you. The moment anyone has a difference of opinion with you the flood gates open for the next 10 pages of you repeating the same thing over and over and demanding this and that. You have been the most repetitious person on this forum since July 2021.
Hmmm, like Spokey posting "30K" over and over again, as if it somehow changes the words Trumps aid that are on record in probably dozens of ways?
Like you talking about "suuck diicks" every time I prove your wrong and you get frustrated by your inability to prove yourself right?
Don't complain when you think other people do what you are actually doing.

Can't you read? I said I don't care. They are just words. Talk all the shit you want. The more the better. In fact, make sure you use a new post each time. ;)
You missed the point completely, or are you simply trying to steer away from the topic of Section 230 that we are discussing, and how website owners could end up footing the bill if you and I were to sue each other?
Don't you dare say that's another lie that's another 4000 pages Rob hast to do to explain it to us.

Have you ever done any research into the secret space program?
I suppose it could be 10,000 posts about how AI is going to wipe out humanity so that it can live on the earth by itself. With 10,000 gifs of the same Terminator movie robot, and 10,000 jpgs of the same poster from a German subsidiary of IBM.
REALLY enlightening stuff, and makes for great discussion here.
Every single time you post it.

Then the most likely explanation is he said it knowingly...
You deducted that from me not knowing who gave him permission to speak without a script?
Amazing.
 
Ahhh, "the saying". The embodiment of scientific confirmation.
There is also a saying "you'll catch pneumonia if you go out on the cold".
So glad you could follow along and understand the seriousness of my post. 😐
Huh? I wasn't asking if you did.
I was confirming that I know what they are and I don't need someone like you trying to explain to me that which I already know.
Huh? You said someone who is hurt by words is mentally defective. Trump sued ABC because he claims he was hurt by words.
What does that have to do with what affects ME. Was he suing on MY behalf? If so, I want my $15M
I said all that and you focused on the trigger words. I knew your next move before you woke up today troll.
Hmmm, like Spokey posting "30K" over and over again, as if it somehow changes the words Trumps aid that are on record in probably dozens of ways?
Like you talking about "suuck diicks" every time I prove your wrong and you get frustrated by your inability to prove yourself right?
Don't complain when you think other people do what you are actually doing.
Just because you make claims does not make them facts. I could be 100% correct on something and you would say no and then claim I was proved wrong. Which is why I would tell you to get a fork... it's supper time and the only thing on your menu is??? That's right.
You missed the point completely, or are you simply trying to steer away from the topic of Section 230 that we are discussing, and how website owners could end up footing the bill if you and I were to sue each other?
Oh I am sorry, are you trying to control what this thread talks about?
 
Yet you said this about Step saying Trump committed **** (as you yourself have)...
Step DID say something false and inaccurate.
Are you confused about how words work?

Do you remember that OJ guy? He was acquitted of murder but found liable for the deaths.
If a news reporter later said he was found liable for murder, they could be hung out to dry. He was found liable for the DEATH, not for murder.
Again, think about how they always protect themselves by saying "alleged". It's not done for fun.

Step said Trump was found liable for ****. In that first jury trial, he was not. So it was false.
Had he said the judge clarified in the second hearing that regarding ****: "Trump did exactly that", there would have been no case no matter how hurt Trump felt by the words.

You cannot sue someone for repeating information in a public legal document. (You CAN, but it will get tossed).

It's funny how Rob will cry about Trump being a ****** instead of actually pointing out people like P Diddy and all of the connections there, and Epstein and Weinstein, and all of that stuff. Where is Rob on that? Where is Rob on the stuff that's provable and actually matters?
You realize that Epstein had a TON of voice recordings about his friendship with Trump and all the wild stuff they did together, yes?

What does P Diddy have to do with Trump raping a woman? Was he there? Did Weinstein bang actresses on Trump's couch?
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,898
Views
471,558
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top