Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Isn't that what the right-wing has been crying about the Mass Media all along?
That they are liars?

Regardless, go directly to the source if you want facts. In this case, the source being the text of the actual hearing decision: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html

I gave you a link so you can see it and read instead of relying on "so-and-so said". Facts tend to get jumbled when you play the Telephone Game. Like if you ask Thx the definition of "in". He'll make up his own, instead fo giving you one from any of a number of dictionaries. And it will be wrong.

"(a group of words from a text or speech)"
Here is a "group of words from a text or speech":
"man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty" - John F. Kennedy
They are quoted verbatim form this paragraph: "The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life."
They are unchanged. They are word-for-word. They are direct. They are exact. They are verbatim.
If you think they are not, please show where I have changed the words. Show where I have changed the order of the words. Show were I have changed the spelling.
Show where I have changed ANYTHING about the words in quotation marks.

Listen, I know what you are attempting to do. Just stop. For the last time, if you leave words out it is no longer a verbatim quote. It is just a quote. They are different no matter how much you want them to be the same. Your *** needs to go take a class.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Rob must be lying here...apparently NPR isn't trustworthy...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Listen, I know what you are attempting to do. Just stop. For the last time, if you leave words out it is no longer a verbatim quote. It is just a quote. They are different no matter how much you want them to be the same. Your *** needs to go take a class.

It sure is. And YOU provided your own verification that it is. Not the first time you proved yourself wrong while trying to prove yourself right:

A "group of". If I say I saw a "group of" Ferraris, do you think that means every Ferrari in existence?
How about a "group of" bikers at the bar? EVERY biker in existence?

And the hole of stupidity you dig yourself into just gets deeper.

View attachment 62062
Rob must be lying here...apparently NPR isn't trustworthy...

That's an interesting sidestep, but it does nothing to prove that the judge's decision in the hearing has been changed. THIS decision: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html
Nor does it show that I said NPR isn't trustworthy. Can you show where it might?

Neither you nor Thx have been able to show the decision has changed.
Would you hurry uo and just Google it? Don't you know that Google just creates whatever answer you need if you tell it to? That's how it works! Just ask Thx; he'll be happy to tell you.

So go ahead and tell Google to create a change to the court hearing decision transcribed here: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It sure is. And YOU provided your own verification that it is. Not the first time you proved yourself wrong while trying to prove yourself right:
View attachment 62064

A "group of". If I say I saw a "group of" Ferraris, do you think that means every Ferrari in existence?
How about a "group of" bikers at the bar? EVERY biker in existence?

And the hole of stupidity you dig yourself into just gets deeper.

There are TWO definitions there fucko. You are wrong so move along.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

There are TWO definitions there fucko. You are wrong so move along.

No shit, dimwit.
And both definitions are satisfied by my quote.

"Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans--born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage--and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world." - John F Kennedy

"the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans" -John F Kennedy.

Both of these quotes are a "group of words" from his full speech.
Both are word-for-word representations of things he said in his speech. No substitutions, no changes in spelling, no paraphrasing, no positional changes. They are VERBATIM.

No chance in hell you passed a language course in high school or university.
Or you had someone write all your papers for you.

Either way, you are fighting incredibly hard to show us you don't know fuckall about this one topic. Is that so we stay focused and don't see how little you know about OTHER topics?

Still waiting for a definition of "regular quote", and that other mystery "kind" of quote.
And no, you didn't do it "already". Everyone knows that.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

That's an interesting sidestep,

No your just spinning to be "right" once again...either that or EVERY media outlet wrong...

So which is more likely...EVERY media outlet not comprehending the jury's decision...or Rob is right...it's not both...

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

This is literally the same as your 30k bs...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No shit, dimwit.
And both definitions are satisfied by my quote.

"Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans--born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage--and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world." - John F Kennedy

"the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans" -John F Kennedy.

Both of these quotes are a "group of words" from his full speech.
Both are word-for-word representations of things he said in his speech. No substitutions, no changes in spelling, no paraphrasing, no positional changes. They are VERBATIM.

No chance in hell you passed a language course in high school or university.
Or you had someone write all your papers for you.

Either way, you are fighting incredibly hard to show us you don't know fuckall about this one topic. Is that so we stay focused and don't see how little you know about OTHER topics?

Still waiting for a definition of "regular quote", and that other mystery "kind" of quote.
And no, you didn't do it "already". Everyone knows that.

Do you live in a dream world or something? You keep arguing the same shit over and over and it is wrong each time you argue it.

A quote and a quote verbatim are NOT the same. You keep claiming to be waiting for a "regular quote" and some mystery "kind" of quote. If you weren't retarded you would have already figured it out. But you voted for Harris and your ego is getting in the way of your brain.

Yes I did show you, more than once now. Your tiny brain wont let you learn.

For the last ******* time...

QUOTE VERBATIM
"I saw a moron named RobGMN not blowing a cow on the side of the gravel road." - Sir Isaac Newton

QUOTE
"I saw RobGMN blowing a cow on the side of the gravel road." - Sir Isaac Newton

See the difference? Go ahead... tell me that the word verbatim means something else you idiot.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

This is literally the same as your 30k bs...

Can you refresh my memory on where you disproved the existence of the database, and of all the quotes contained therein?

Did you combine it with you proof that the hearing decision is no longer valid, and simply forget to post it?
If I missed it, just provide a post number and I'll find it.

Do you live in a dream world or something? You keep arguing the same shit over and over and it is wrong each time you argue it.

A quote and a quote verbatim are NOT the same. You keep claiming to be waiting for a "regular quote" and some mystery "kind" of quote. If you weren't retarded you would have already figured it out. But you voted for Harris and your ego is getting in the way of your brain.

What does Harris have to do with your claim that there is a "regular quote" versus a second "kind" of quote?
Are you so obsessed with Harris that you simply say her name whenever you **** up?

Yes I did show you, more than once now. Your tiny brain wont let you learn.

For the last ******* time...

QUOTE VERBATIM
"I saw a moron named RobGMN not blowing a cow on the side of the gravel road." - Sir Isaac Newton

QUOTE
"I saw RobGMN blowing a cow on the side of the gravel road." - Sir Isaac Newton

See the difference? Go ahead... tell me that the word verbatim means something else you idiot.

Nope. You are wrong. Here's yet ANOTHER example, right from APA style: " Effective teams can be difficult to describe because “high performance along one domain does not translate to high performance along another” (Ervin et al., 2018, p. 470). "
Hmmm, a verbatim quote that is not every single word from the book or even the PAGE they are quoting from.

Of course, grammerly says this: Verbatim is a term that is used when quoting something word for word, using exactly the same verbiage that was used originally. When quoting something verbatim there is no room for interpretation, the passage is an exact replica of the original passage. The word verbatim is used as an adverb and as an adjective. The word verbatim is taken directly from the Latin word verbatim, which means word for word."-https://grammarist.com/usage/verbatim-vs-paraphrase/
Notice they say an "exact replica of the original passage".
What is a "passage" you might ask? It's this: "a usually brief portion of a written work or speech that is relevant to a point under discussion or noteworthy for content or style" -https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/passage

Hmmmm, "verbatim" can be used to describe a "brief portion" of written work or speech. Almost like you don't have to print the ENTIRE THING you're quoting FROM.

OK. Now wrack your small brain for an hour trying to change the meaning of "passage" to no longer be a "brief portion".
Maybe provide your own definition of "passage" that says "The ENTIRE work". Or a definition of "brief" that says "Inclusive of EVERYTHING". Maybe a definition of "portion" that says "All contents".
Go ahead, work on more ridiculous spin

Keep failing. It's good entertainment.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Can you refresh my memory on where you disproved the existence of the database, and of all the quotes contained therein?

Can you provide an unbiased database from a publisher that tracked biden as well?

And which is it Rob...did EVERY media outlet not comprehend the jury's decision and are all wrong or are you? It's not both...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Can you refresh my memory on where you disproved the existence of the database, and of all the quotes contained therein?

Did you combine it with you proof that the hearing decision is no longer valid, and simply forget to post it?
If I missed it, just provide a post number and I'll find it.

What does Harris have to do with your claim that there is a "regular quote" versus a second "kind" of quote?
Are you so obsessed with Harris that you simply say her name whenever you **** up?


Nope. You are wrong. Here's yet ANOTHER example, right from APA style: " Effective teams can be difficult to describe because “high performance along one domain does not translate to high performance along another” (Ervin et al., 2018, p. 470). "
Hmmm, a verbatim quote that is not every single word from the book or even the PAGE they are quoting from.

Of course, grammerly says this: Verbatim is a term that is used when quoting something word for word, using exactly the same verbiage that was used originally. When quoting something verbatim there is no room for interpretation, the passage is an exact replica of the original passage. The word verbatim is used as an adverb and as an adjective. The word verbatim is taken directly from the Latin word verbatim, which means word for word."-https://grammarist.com/usage/verbatim-vs-paraphrase/
Notice they say an "exact replica of the original passage".
What is a "passage" you might ask? It's this: "a usually brief portion of a written work or speech that is relevant to a point under discussion or noteworthy for content or style" -https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/passage

Hmmmm, "verbatim" can be used to describe a "brief portion" of written work or speech. Almost like you don't have to print the ENTIRE THING you're quoting FROM.

OK. Now wrack your small brain for an hour trying to change the meaning of "passage" to no longer be a "brief portion".
Maybe provide your own definition of "passage" that says "The ENTIRE work". Or a definition of "brief" that says "Inclusive of EVERYTHING". Maybe a definition of "portion" that says "All contents".
Go ahead, work on more ridiculous spin

Keep failing. It's good entertainment.

Jesus Christ... You have the definition and you can't get it right.

Verbatim is a term that is used when quoting something word for word, using exactly the same verbiage that was used originally. When quoting something verbatim there is no room for interpretation, the passage is an exact replica of the original passage. The word verbatim is used as an adverb and as an adjective. The word verbatim is taken directly from the Latin word verbatim, which means word for word."

NOWHERE DOES IT SAY "EXCEPT WHEN LEAVING OUT WORDS". This is literally telling you a quote verbatim is an exact copy of what was said. Man you are ******* stupid. Seriously, go **** off somewhere you dumb ****!

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So NPR is lying about it?

NPR has been running cover for Trump since he was GOP candidate back in 2015.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

NPR has been running cover for Trump since he was GOP candidate back in 2015.

And Maddow isn't a dem conspiracy theorist...she's a deep cover Rep agent damaging the left from the inside

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It sure is. And YOU provided your own verification that it is. Not the first time you proved yourself wrong while trying to prove yourself right:
View attachment 62064

A "group of". If I say I saw a "group of" Ferraris, do you think that means every Ferrari in existence?
How about a "group of" bikers at the bar? EVERY biker in existence?

And the hole of stupidity you dig yourself into just gets deeper.


That's an interesting sidestep, but it does nothing to prove that the judge's decision in the hearing has been changed. THIS decision: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html
Nor does it show that I said NPR isn't trustworthy. Can you show where it might?

Neither you nor Thx have been able to show the decision has changed.
Would you hurry uo and just Google it? Don't you know that Google just creates whatever answer you need if you tell it to? That's how it works! Just ask Thx; he'll be happy to tell you.

So go ahead and tell Google to create a change to the court hearing decision transcribed here: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html

You mean the judges opinion? Did you actually read it? Let's just say this: if this Judge's name was THX, Rob would be raising holy cane about the games the judge tries to play with language in that opinion. And the judge is certainly welcome to his opinion, but let's be 100% clear about what happened in this civil court case.

1) Since the judge can't decide what Trump was or wasn't liable for, the JURY found Trump NOT LIABLE for ****.
2) This was a civil case, meaning that the loonie toons E Jean Carroll only had to prove a preponderance that Trump ***** her. IOW, the JURY found it's less likely that Trump ***** her.

How somebody concludes from those facts that Trump did indeed **** Mrs Loonie Toons is beyond me.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

And Maddow isn't a dem conspiracy theorist...she's a deep cover Rep agent damaging the left from the inside

Ironically, that is the only thing other than pure TDS driven insanity that would explain Maddow's disconnect from reality.