My word you are desperate. I can't keep correcting and teaching you. There aren't enough hours in the day. Both of my statements are facts. Why Rob, why are you insisting on arguing against biological facts?
Just because you state them does not mean they are facts. Please provide proof of your claim that orgams esxiss to stimulate ovulation.
Maybe explain why, if "orgasm is to stimulate ovulation", ovulation follows the same average cycle in women regardless of how many orgasms they have or if they have none at all.
Prove your hypothesis.
Show me where I made that claim and not you making that up.
It was when you asked me to teach you. When you deemed all Trump supporters as uneducated. Another post you forgot you made? The sdame post where you showed us you didn't know what the scientific method is:
Easily, by saying the 3 groups of things we tested are safe.
A place that is inhabited by humans but has unsafe drinking water and dirt is "safe biologically"?
Thank god I never ate any food delivered by you. You probably spit on it and called it a delicacy.
Because it meant nothing outside of the camp need worry about contamination.
The water in wells outside of the camp also had unacceptable levels of PFAs from the firefighting foam used in the camp.
"Recently, officials expanded testing beyond the camp's boundaries, as the U.S. Department of Defense deals with a massive PFAS problem at military bases across the country.
Of the 30 wells tested, nearly all had some PFAS chemicals, mostly at low levels. Only one had PFAS above the federal recommended limit for drinking water of 70 parts per trillion, said Capt. William Hermanson, a spokesperson for Camp Ripley."
Go ahead, give me another warning about how I'm looking into information that I I have no right to be looking at, LOL.
Hardly man who speaks from ignorance.
Wrong again.
That's twice now you can't keep my penis outcha mouth.
YOU are the one who decided to somehow link it to your small intellect, remember that?
Probably not, so here it is:
Maybe you meant you like to compare your junk to those of children, teenagers, and full grown adults?
Regardless, it's a weird activity. Probably should stop doing it ASAP. Pedo.
Biden has nothing to do with Scientific Method. Stay on topic troll.
Again you are wrong. You make a claim about him (or anyone else), you get to prove that claim is true using the scientific method, unless someone else already has.
You want to claim he broke the law? Show the proof. Either your own or what someone else has obtained.
If you can't then your claim is bullsh*t to anyone who questions it.
Your CLAIM, your BELIEF that there are 31,000+ actual, verifiable, undeniable lies spoken by Trump.
Nope. The database exists and you can go look at it yourself. Not asking you to trust my statement.
All quoted, all recorded, all verified and verifiable.
Unlike your claims that it is only "alleged" that Trump had classified documents, or that "nothing happened" on January 6th at the Capitol, or that Biden broke the law in using the SPR, or that bones are not innervated, or that two wires touching each other are "bridged", or that averages are only used by lazy people or for nefarious mneans, or that a portion of a population can be vaccinated, or that there was no change in the number of cars on the road during the pandemic, etc, etc, etc.
Those are all your CLAIMS and BELIEFS. And you have been unable to prove a single one.
NOT ONE SINGLE ONE.
View attachment 57424
Uh oh...snappy comeback warning everyone
Nothing "snappy" about facts, evidence, proofs.
Still waiting for your answer to how Trump thought the electoral vote was going to be stopped LEGALLY by his supporters within hours of the vote.
What was his plan or expectations of them?
Writing letters? Phone call campaign? Waving hats and wearign flags?
HOW DO YOU LEGALLY STOP AN ELECTORAL VOTE WITHIN HOURS OF SAID VOTE?
Please answer and explain in detail, otherwise stop trying to defend him as innocent of inciting insurrection.