Current events discussion

Literally a book about Trump
And because it's a book that reaffirms your obsession with trump...it's gotta be true...right?

green-eggs-ham-dr-seuss-9780007798858.jpg


Here's another 100% fact filled book on the dangers of colored egg addiction...
 
Says the guy who didn't know the Scientific Method until a few posts ago. The guy who thinks bones are not innervated. The guy who believes orgasm causes ovulation. The guy confused by mathematical averages.
You're outright lying again, why? To save face?
You are avoiding a direct challenge to your belief that beliefs can be used in the scientific method to prove another belief.
So I'll ask again: What belief do you know of that has been proved with other beliefs?
It can be your own belief or the belief of another.
Once more, I never made this claim. You are lying again.
I have no idea what the correct procedure is.
You should have just stopped here.
What I do know is that you stated VERY clearly that you deemed Camp Ripley "safe biologically" until I found out that the place was later found to have unacceptable levels of PFAs.
How is that? You don't know the dates I was there.
You then tried to backpedal and say you didn't do tests that would be necessary to determine the pace "safe biologically".
Not once did I claim this either. You are lying.
It's funny that you bring up water testing, since you said you DIDN'T test the water there.
Oh so you CAN read and retain the information.
What DID you test to declare the camp "safe biologically"? The mess hall? Computer keyboards? Phone handsets? Bed linens>
Ahh Ahh Ahh That is none of your business.
Ahhh, a very cute ad hominem. Typical for one with the intellect of a child.
True and it is combined with that of a teenager and finally compounded with that of a full grown adult.
Here is the basis of the discussion of beliefs being used to prove a belief:

Thxone: So explain to all of us uneducated "Trump supporters" how one first arrives at a scientific fact. One that has never existed but then comes to be a scientific fact. No thoughts, no feelings, no beliefs are used to form an idea that can then be proved or disproved? They just exist? They are just there suddenly for you to argue about?

I never once said that facts "just exist" or are just here "suddenly for" me "to argue about". That was something you created in your mind and thought you'd in some way use to argue against me.
BELIEFS are the things "just exist" or are "suddenly there". And as I have said MANY times, I don't refer to beliefs when arguing about matters of science, politics. medicine, economics, etc.
It's a fool's folly to do so, and I honestly don't understand WHY people do it.

You want to believe in a god? Have at it, and enjoy. But DON'T argue that I should believe in the same god, or any god at all, when you have ZERO evidence to back it up.
You want to believe bones do not have nerves in them? Go right ahead. But DON'T be a fool and argue your belief in the face of well over a century of empirical evidence that proves bones are innervated.
You want to believe that a $4,000 power cable for your home stereo sounds better than running 12 gauge copper romex direct from the breaker box into your amplifier? Have at it. But DON'T argue it as fact when there is absolutely ZERO empirical evidence, and you can't do better than a 50/50 success ratio when blind testing.

You want to be the fool who argues using personal beliefs as a form of "proof" and "evidence"?
Go right ahead. But don't cry when people destroy your argument with little to no effort, and TELL you you are a fool.
So instead of going on and on... Just say you have no idea. That is why you copy and paste what others have done already.
 
View attachment 57403

Literally a book about Trump and his continuing lie (war cry, even) claiming the election was "stolen".

The man who ghost-wrote "The Art of The Deal" for Trump had this to say:
"Trump is not only willing to lie, but he doesn't get bothered by it, doesn't feel guilty about it, isn't preoccupied by it," Schwartz said. "There's an emptiness inside Trump. There's an absence of a soul. There's an absence of a heart."

Sounds like Trump and Goebbels would get along well.
Sounds like a literal book of opinions.
 
You're outright lying again, why? To save face?
More empty claims on your part. Which one of these is a lie?
"Says the guy who didn't know the Scientific Method until a few posts ago. The guy who thinks bones are not innervated. The guy who believes orgasm causes ovulation. The guy confused by mathematical averages."
Once more, I never made this claim. You are lying again.
You did, and you are sidestepping the question. Again.
What belief do YOU know of that has been proved by another belief?
You should have just stopped here.
How is that? You don't know the dates I was there.
It was before the pandemic at your own admittance, and Camp Ripley was found to have excessive PFA levels in 2023 from firefighting foam used since the 70's.

Not once did I claim this either. You are lying.
Au contaire, mon frere. YOU said you deemed it "safe biologically". Only after I showed that there were unsafe PFA levels there as of 2023 did you try to backpedal and say you never tested the water.
How can inhabitable space be considered "safe biologically" if you don't even test the DRINKING WATER?
"Your home is perfectly safe to live in. Ignore the lead in the paint, the mold on the walls, the rat feces in the cupboards, and the lead water pipes. We don't test for that stuff" HAHAHAHA
Oh so you CAN read and retain the information.
Ahh Ahh Ahh That is none of your business.
Afraid it is. I could request the records if I wanted to. And you already told us is was before the 2023 testing where they found the place UNSAFE biologically. Your hubris stung you yet again.
True and it is combined with that of a teenager and finally compounded with that of a full grown adult.
Waiting toi see evidence of that. Maybe you'll show us in the future.
So instead of going on and on... Just say you have no idea. That is why you copy and paste what others have done already.
That has NOTHING to do with using beliefs as a basis for argument, and expecting others to accept it.
As usual, you spin off on a tangent to avoid the actual topic.

You want to be the fool who argues using personal beliefs as a form of "proof" and "evidence"?
Go right ahead. But don't cry when people destroy your argument with little to no effort, and TELL you you are a fool.

Or...you can go ahead and provide proof of some or even ALL of your claims that you have not proved thus far.
Would you like a list?
 
Last edited:
More empty claims on your part. Which one of these is a lie?
"Says the guy who didn't know the Scientific Method until a few posts ago. The guy who thinks bones are not innervated. The guy who believes orgasm causes ovulation. The guy confused by mathematical averages."
All 4 are lies.
You did, and you are sidestepping the question. Again.
What belief do YOU know of that has been proved by another belief?
Lie #5
It was before the pandemic at your own admittance, and Camp Ripley was found to have excessive PFA levels in 2023 from firefighting foam used since the 70's.
You still don't know when I was there.
Au contaire, mon frere. YOU said you deemed it "safe biologically". Only after I showed that there were unsafe PFA levels there as of 2023 did you try to backpedal and say you never tested the water.
How can inhabitable space be considered "safe biologically" if you don't even test the DRINKING WATER?
"Your home is perfectly safe to live in. Ignore the lead in the paint, the mold on the walls, the rat feces in the cupboards, and the lead water pipes. We don't test for that stuff" HAHAHAHA
Take your issue with the water to them. That was not the reason we were there you broken record.
Afraid it is. I could request the records if I wanted to. And you already told us is was before the 2023 testing where they found the place UNSAFE biologically. Your hubris stung you yet again.
LOL Good luck with your "request".
Waiting toi see evidence of that. Maybe you'll show us in the future.
Now you are trying to get me to show you my penis??? Back off buddy.
That has NOTHING to do with using beliefs as a basis for argument, and expecting others to accept it.
As usual, you spin off on a tangent to avoid the actual topic.
You are the one who keeps using the word belief then demanding some kind of something for a word only you keep using.
You want to be the fool who argues using personal beliefs as a form of "proof" and "evidence"?
Go right ahead. But don't cry when people destroy your argument with little to no effort, and TELL you you are a fool.
You are the only one doing it Rob.
Or...you can go ahead and provide proof of some or even ALL of your claims that you have not proved thus far.
Would you like a list?
Prove you are not a hermaphrodite.
 
Wow!

https://modernity.news/2024/03/15/boeing-whistleblower-if-anything-happens-to-me-its-not-*******/

"Russia Claims It Has Killed 6,000 Foreign Fighters In Ukraine, Including 491 Americans"


I heard radioactive dust sprinkles are good with cereal in the morning:


"Vladimir Putin, the Russian President who recently earned the United States' ire over his "ready for nuclear war" statement, has now reportedly asked his officials to set up a nuclear power unit in space."

 
More empty claims on your part. Which one of these is a lie?
"Says the guy who didn't know the Scientific Method until a few posts ago. The guy who thinks bones are not innervated. The guy who believes orgasm causes ovulation. The guy confused by mathematical averages."

You did, and you are sidestepping the question. Again.
What belief do YOU know of that has been proved by another belief?

It was before the pandemic at your own admittance, and Camp Ripley was found to have excessive PFA levels in 2023 from firefighting foam used since the 70's.


Au contaire, mon frere. YOU said you deemed it "safe biologically". Only after I showed that there were unsafe PFA levels there as of 2023 did you try to backpedal and say you never tested the water.
How can inhabitable space be considered "safe biologically" if you don't even test the DRINKING WATER?
"Your home is perfectly safe to live in. Ignore the lead in the paint, the mold on the walls, the rat feces in the cupboards, and the lead water pipes. We don't test for that stuff" HAHAHAHA

Afraid it is. I could request the records if I wanted to. And you already told us is was before the 2023 testing where they found the place UNSAFE biologically. Your hubris stung you yet again.

Waiting toi see evidence of that. Maybe you'll show us in the future.

That has NOTHING to do with using beliefs as a basis for argument, and expecting others to accept it.
As usual, you spin off on a tangent to avoid the actual topic.

You want to be the fool who argues using personal beliefs as a form of "proof" and "evidence"?
Go right ahead. But don't cry when people destroy your argument with little to no effort, and TELL you you are a fool.

Or...you can go ahead and provide proof of some or even ALL of your claims that you have not proved thus far.
Would you like a list?
Hey mister biologist, if a man cuts his peepee off and takes female hormones, is that man now a legitimate woman?
 
@RobGMN I am still waiting for you to explain how you got BANNED from a forum in just 147 post. Explain why there is always tension on the forums YOU post on. Explain why there is ALWAYS arguing on forums YOU post on. Explain why you demand proof from every forum YOU post on.

I am calling you out on YOUR bullshit. Are you here to have conversations or to argue with everyone? It seems like you are literally telling everyone no, you are wrong only RobGMN is right.
 
All 4 are lies.
Oh? Your bad memory trips you up yet again. Your claim:
1710518615558.png


How can a question be a lie?
Can you show us a belief that was proved by other beliefs, or not?
Try to stay on topic.
You still don't know when I was there.
YOU said you were there before the COVID pandemic. COVID surfaced in 2020. The excessive PFA levels were discovered in 2023. 2023 is AFTER you were there.
Take your issue with the water to them. That was not the reason we were there you broken record.
How can you declare a place "safe biologically" when the water is tainted with unacceptable levels of PFAs in the WATER?
Why would you expect a "thank you" for making such a false declaration of safety?
You're a fire inspector who sees open cans of volatile liquids scattered in a building and says "It is safe".
Liar.
LOL Good luck with your "request".
Mmm hmmm. Easier to get than you'd think, kid. Were you there to test the turtles, and deemed it "safe biologically" for them but not for humans?
1710520838870.png

Now you are trying to get me to show you my penis??? Back off buddy.
You think your intellect in in your penis? That would track given the limited size of your intellect, HAHAHA.
1710521263281.png

Or, were you saying you show your penis to teenagers and children?

You are the one who keeps using the word belief then demanding some kind of something for a word only you keep using.
It's a word that describes your unfounded and unproved claims. They are "beliefs". Like your BELIEF that Biden's use of the SPR was illegal. Unfounded and unproved. When you can prove them, they are no longer simply BELIEFS.
You are the only one doing it Rob.
Show me ONE time where I demanded or expected my beliefs to be accepted as facts. I'll wait.

Prove you are not a hermaphrodite.
I have never made such a claim. Are you asking me to prove a claim made by someone else?
That's not how it works, kid. Whoever makes a claim gets to prove it themselves.
Welcome to the world of grownups. If you're not a grownup, maybe don't play here.

And since you brought up the word, you have STILL not proved your claim that genitals determine ****** orientation. If they do, what is the "correct" orientation for a hermaphrodite?

Hey mister biologist, if a man cuts his peepee off and takes female hormones, is that man now a legitimate woman?
It depends on the situation, but it is entirely possible. Just like it's a fact that all humans start off as females before genital ****** differentiation occurs.
So I'll ask you: If a hermaphrodite has their penis removed, are they now a woman? If they have their v@gina removed, are they now a man?
Or are they both man AND woman and will always be as such no matter what surgery they have?

Answer with some scientific info if you can. No Terminator gifs, or silly clown or NPC faces.
We're not children here. or at least none of should be (even if they act like one).

Cue Nonamehere to post a bunch of stupid memes, just like every other time a right-winger gets proved wrong yet again..
 

Attachments

  • 1710521217329.png
    1710521217329.png
    14 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,900
Views
471,877
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top