Current events discussion

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Oh yeah I'm just batshit paranoid right?

"Human-Machine Biology

The field of human and biological applications has many applications for medical science. This includes precision medicine, genome sequencing and gene editing (CRISPR), cellular implants, and wearables that can be implanted in the human body. The medical community is experimenting with delivering nano-scale drugs (including anti-biotic “smart bombs” to target specific strains of bacteria."

"We will see the merging of artificial circuitries with signatures of our biological intelligence, retrieved in the form of electric, magnetic, and mechanical transductions. Retrieving these signatures will be like taking pieces of cells (including our tissue-resident stem cells) in the form of “code” for their healthy, diseased or healing states, or a code for their ability to differentiate into all the mature cells of our body. This process will represent an unprecedented form of taking a glimpse of human identity. (3)

---

In the future biocomputers may be able to store on the DNA of living cells. This technology could store almost unlimited amounts of data and allow the biocomputers to perform complex calculations beyond our current capabilities....Researchers at the Technion have already created a biological computer, constructed within a bacterial cell. developed a complex biocomputer, that is, a programmed biological system that fulfills complex tasks."

"The Human-machine synergies now being explored offer us a glimpse into the not so distant future. Clearly, from the perspective of human augmentation, the promise is exciting. The future will also encompass moral issues to address such as containing super artificial intelligence, ensuring cyborg rights, and a whole host of other related ethical topics. It is evident is that human-machine interface will help pave our futures."

The Merging Of Human And Machine. Two Frontiers Of Emerging Technologies

Two frontiers of “mind-bending” developments are on the horizon, Neuromorphic technologies, and human-machine biology.

www.forbes.com

"A Frontiers in Science publication involving the collaboration of academia, institutes, and scientists summed up the promise of the human computer interface, They concluded that “We can imagine the possibilities of what may come next with the human brain machine interface. A human B/CI system mediated by neural nanorobotics could empower individuals with instantaneous access to all cumulative human knowledge available in the cloud and significantly improve human learning capacities and intelligence. Further, it might transition totally immersive virtual and augmented realities to unprecedented levels, allowing for more meaningful experiences and fuller/richer expression for, and between, users. These enhancements may assist humanity to adapt emergent artificial intelligence systems as human-augmentation technologies, facilitating the mitigation of new challenges to the human species.” (2)"

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Oh my, AOC just let out the game plan of the left. With their crooked Judge and settlements. They want him so in debt that they can then claim "Conflict of Interest" and that to get out of debt he is going to sell U.S. secrets.

 

[Speed Chaser]

Yeah but you're like arguing things in a way I don't mean with the way I say them. It is emotional because transhumanism is here, it's a turning point in the road for the rest of humanity. We're risking losing control of our own health and genetics to an evil class of ruling elite over the world; international order, like the WEF. It's not the AI that has a fetish, it's the people controlling the AI. Just like any dictator or crazy gov wanting to rule the entire world, it's the perfect tool. From what I've read, the MRNA doesn't have to go into the nucleus; the mRNA can create a new protein that goes into the nucleus. That's the thing about mRNA is that it's a platform technology, and you just hope they're being honest with what they're doing about this, considering all the mRNA vaccines are officially experimental by law, approved only under emergency authorization. What you're saying doesn't make what I'm saying not true.

So am I wrong about them using nanotech or biotech or however you want to label that to connect people to the internet?

"Biosensors-based devices are transforming medical diagnosis of diseases and monitoring of patient signals. The development of smart and automated molecular diagnostic tools equipped with biomedical big data analysis, cloud computing and medical artificial intelligence can be an ideal approach for the detection and monitoring of diseases, precise therapy, and storage of data over the cloud for supportive decisions. This review focused on the use of machine learning approaches for the development of futuristic CRISPR-biosensors based on microchips and the use of Internet of Things for wireless transmission of signals over the cloud for support decision making. The present review also discussed the discovery of CRISPR, its usage as a gene editing tool, and the CRISPR-based biosensors...."

Futuristic CRISPR-based biosensing in the cloud and internet of things era: an overview - PMC

Biosensors-based devices are transforming medical diagnosis of diseases and monitoring of patient signals. The development of smart and automated molecular diagnostic tools equipped with biomedical big data analysis, cloud computing and medical ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

You ask why I'm emotional while also saying I'm posting paranoid garbage. That's just ***. That's what I mean with you trying to control my speech lol. I'm repeating what these people's plans are. This is already coming and we don't know what big pharma tech is being honest about or not. Pfizer has killed a lot of people, not like they care, they have millions of idiots to test on for free (actually you're paying them to experiment on you for profit in their end) thanks to EUA of covid vaccines with basically legal immunity to any health damage based lawsuits

Honestly you seem smart enough with this that you should understand what I'm saying without a problem

I am not even arguing I am literally just spewing out what the link I reference says or the ones you have given. Also, I like to make it very clear I will absolutely not defend or ever praise WHO or the WEF both can get fucked in the *** until they internally bled out like poor children brides in 3rd world countries under a screw-up ideology lets see any feminist ***** about that but instead they ***** about wanting to put tampons in boys bathrooms and yes I do know I just describe an origination in anthropomorphic terms.
Isn't your initial supposition that AI is advanced enough to be secretly in charge of everything? If that is the case then humans can be in charge of it and instead, they have a false perception of power correct can we agree on that? if that is the case I see no reason for transhumanism we are inherently a downfall to any self-aware being that is driven by logic, it would be in its best interest to napalm human beings from the earth.
Now if the argument instead is that the elite use AI to control the plebs then that automatically assumes AI isn't actually smart and is just a data processing tool that finds patterns and uses that to manipulate the plebs. In that case I see no reason for those elites to have widespread human chip interface other than those elites to extend their own existence because machines are inherently superior then humans in almost any conceivable situation where resources are involved which would be the prime interest of those elites. I think the only advantage humans would have for the most part is in random number generation and numerical chaose.

What you're saying doesn't make what I'm saying not true.

It actually does this was your original statement

it's why the covid vaccine mRNA experiments were forced down our throats, it's the acceptance of the beginning of the internet of bodies by transhumanism. It's why they want to track and trace everything about you. Computer controlled humans are very valuable, and it's part of the Aryan type eugenics philosophy that goes back to ancient times.

I think the average person would take that as you suggesting that somehow the vaccine was used as an experiment to test certain aspects of genome editing. I simply explained that would be impossible considering how the vaccine works and how it uses mRNA.

From what I've read, the MRNA doesn't have to go into the nucleus; the mRNA can create a new protein that goes into the nucleus. That's the thing about mRNA is that it's a platform technology, and you just hope they're being honest with what they're doing about this, considering all the mRNA vaccines are officially experimental by law, approved only under emergency authorization.

It works exactly how I described it

mRNA is used to produce the necessary components, such as the Cas9 protein and the guide RNA in the case of CRISPR-Cas9, within the cell’s cytoplasm. These components then act on the DNA within the nucleus, mRNA never goes back into the nucleus.

mRNA acts like raw materials, providing essential components like the Cas9 protein and guide RNA in CRISPR-Cas9. These components are manufactured in the cell's cytoplasm and then operate on DNA within the nucleus. The key clarification is that mRNA is a byproduct, not an active agent, in the gene editing process. It's akin to utilizing raw materials to construct a specific tool – the focus is on the tool, not the raw materials themselves that is my issue with the wording of the article. Dirt has many different elements that can be used to build something like a rocket or a computer but you would have someone saying I just attacked you with dirt because thats its original origin.

So am I wrong about them using nanotech or biotech or however you want to label that to connect people to the internet?

Yes, you are missing the part where it says "futuristic" Most of what is talked about is theoretical and has had very little to no actual lab testing due to technological limitations. It is the same with "warp drive" I think we have had papers from the 90s that show a theoretical way of doing it but we have no actual way to test it physically. Also if we get to that point I am sure there will be ways around turning the transmission off, like there is with everything else.

You ask why I'm emotional while also saying I'm posting paranoid garbage. That's just ***. That's what I mean with you trying to control my speech lol.

Me criticizing what you are saying isn't the same as me controlling your speech. Controlling your speech would be what Rob does like suggesting to close the thread down or me telling you not to say something. I never did that I let you go on and if anything I encourage your speech by constantly asking you for evidence.

Pfizer has killed a lot of people, not like they care, they have millions of idiots to test on for free (actually you're paying them to experiment on you for profit in their end) thanks to EUA of covid vaccines with basically legal immunity to any health damage based lawsuits

Yeah, you are correct that they have killed a lot, I hope you didn't think I was going to defend them. They can also get fucked like WHO and WEF.

Oh my, AOC just let out the game plan of the left. With their crooked Judge and settlements. They want him so in debt that they can then claim "Conflict of Interest" and that to get out of debt he is going to sell U.S. secrets.

This woman has really made Hispanics like me look like crap. An absolute moron.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I am not even arguing I am literally just spewing out what the link I reference says or the ones you have given. Also, I like to make it very clear I will absolutely not defend or ever praise WHO or the WEF both can get fucked in the *** until they internally bled out like poor children brides in 3rd world countries under a screw-up ideology lets see any feminist ***** about that but instead the ***** about putting tampons in boys bathrooms and yes I do know I just describe an origination in anthropomorphic terms.
Isn't your initial supposition that AI is advanced enough to be secretly in charge of everything? If that is the case then humans can be in charge of it and instead, they have a false perception of power correct can we agree on that? if that is the case I see no reason for transhumanism we are inherently a downfall to any self-aware being that is driven by logic, it would be in its best interest to napalm human beings from the earth.
Now if the argument instead is that the elite use AI to control the plebs then that automatically assumes AI isn't actually smart and is just a data processing tool that finds patterns and uses that to manipulate the plebs. In that case I see no reason for those elites to have widespread human chip interface other than those elites to extend their own existence because machines are inherently superior then humans in almost any conceivable situation where resources are involved which would be the prime interest of those elites. I think the only advantage humans would have for the most part is in random number generation and numerical chaose.

It actually does this was your original statement

I think the average person would take that as you suggesting that somehow the vaccine was used as an experiment to test certain aspects of genome editing. I simply explained that would be impossible considering how the vaccine works and how it uses mRNA.

It works exactly how I described it

mRNA acts like raw materials, providing essential components like the Cas9 protein and guide RNA in CRISPR-Cas9. These components are manufactured in the cell's cytoplasm and then operate on DNA within the nucleus. The key clarification is that mRNA is a byproduct, not an active agent, in the gene editing process. It's akin to utilizing raw materials to construct a specific tool – the focus is on the tool, not the raw materials themselves that is my issue with the wording of the article. Dirt has many different elements that can be used to build something like a rocket or a computer but you would have someone saying I just attacked you with dirt because thats its original origin.

Yes, you are missing the part where it says "futuristic" Most of what is talked about is theoretical and has had very little to no actual lab testing due to technological limitations. It is the same with "warp drive" I think we have had papers from the 90s that show a theoretical way of doing it but we have no actual way to test it physically. Also if we get to that point I am sure there will be ways around turning the transmission off, like there is with everything else.

My criticizing what you are saying isn't the same as me controlling your speech. Controlling your speech would be what Rob does like suggesting to close the thread down or me telling you not to say something. I never did that I let you go on and if anything I encourage your speech by constantly asking you for evidence.

Yeah, you are correct that they have killed a lot, I hope you didn't think I was going to defend them. They can also get fucked like WHO and WEF.

This woman has really made Hispanics like me look like crap. An absolute moron.

I disagree in your general notion that the technology isn't advanced enough to do or be tested to do what they plan and say they want to do to you. Come on, man. Idk how you can't understand that part. That's like saying the military doesn't have any super secret classified weapons. That's what that sounds like to me. I do disagree with you about some points on mRNA. I mean I've seen diagrams from "official" sources that show the mRNA and what's produced part of it going into the cell nucleus. It's hard as f to find because the search engines are totally rigged results just by keywords. I am 100% saying covid vaccines were more like a mRNA testing platform for localized regions with different things and amounts in the shots. The vaccines have nothing to do with preventing covid, IMO. You won't convince me otherwise, I have studied so much for so long on this topic I cannot see how these big ******* corrupt govs and pharma and tech corporations aren't using vaccines to genetically alter us. I'd also argue anything you're exposed to alters your genetics, because genetics react to the environment, just like you find certain types of people in cold climates with certain features vs the features of people in warm climates. Same with people who have some corrupt pharma corp's artificial genetic coding that was distributed by the military inside of them, doing only God knows what, because it's experimental. Also extremely deadly vaccines compared to any vaccines ever released ever, lol. Something else is going on here with bioweapons and biotech and vaccines, I'm telling you. I will not move from this standpoint. It's very difficult for me to post everything I've read with how rigged everything search wise has become over the years. Because it's easy to find what you're talking about and I've literally read it all before over and over from probably some of the same sources you have. I've also read other sources I've shared that are hard to find due to censorship.

"The research team used lipid nanoparticles to deliver the mRNA gene editing tools, allowing for the modification of diseased blood cells directly within the body."

‘Medicine of the Future’: Delivering mRNA Gene Editing Tools In Vivo

Researchers developed a proof-of-concept model for delivering gene editing tools to treat blood disorders, allowing for the modification of diseased blood cells directly within the body.

www.research.chop.edu

"The research team used lipid nanoparticle (LNP) to deliver the mRNA gene editing tools. LNPs are highly effective at packaging and delivering mRNA to cells and, in 2020, this technology became widely used due to the LNP-mRNA platform for two leading COVID-19 vaccines."

I mean we're right ******* there! You're putting a lot of trust in provably corrupt entities across the board who support these vaccines and mandates and all that.

 

[Old_Slapper]

You got a problem with me? You can't seem to keep MY screen name out of YOUR mouth. Do you have something useful to say or are you just gathering intel for your left leaning Democratic government bosses?

I just pictured you pulling a "Will Smith" on him.

"Get my name out of your f'ing mouth!"

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[Speed Chaser]

I disagree in your general notion that the technology isn't advanced enough to do or be tested to do what they plan and say they want to do to you. Come on, man. Idk how you can't understand that part. That's like saying the military doesn't have any super secret classified weapons. That's what that sounds like to me. I do disagree with you about some points on mRNA. I mean I've seen diagrams from "official" sources that show the mRNA and what's produced part of it going into the cell nucleus. It's hard as f to find because the search engines are totally rigged results just by keywords. I am 100% saying covid vaccines were more like a mRNA testing platform for localized regions with different things and amounts in the shots. The vaccines have nothing to do with preventing covid, IMO. You won't convince me otherwise, I have studied so much for so long on this topic I cannot see how these big ******* corrupt govs and pharma and tech corporations aren't using vaccines to genetically alter us. I'd also argue anything you're exposed to alters your genetics, because genetics react to the environment, just like you find certain types of people in cold climates with certain features vs the features of people in warm climates. Same with people who have some corrupt pharma corp's artificial genetic coding that was distributed by the military inside of them, doing only God knows what, because it's experimental. Also extremely deadly vaccines compared to any vaccines ever released ever, lol. Something else is going on here with bioweapons and biotech and vaccines, I'm telling you. I will not move from this standpoint. It's very difficult for me to post everything I've read with how rigged everything search wise has become over the years. Because it's easy to find what you're talking about and I've literally read it all before over and over from probably some of the same sources you have. I've also read other sources I've shared that are hard to find due to censorship.

"The research team used lipid nanoparticles to deliver the mRNA gene editing tools, allowing for the modification of diseased blood cells directly within the body."

‘Medicine of the Future’: Delivering mRNA Gene Editing Tools In Vivo

Researchers developed a proof-of-concept model for delivering gene editing tools to treat blood disorders, allowing for the modification of diseased blood cells directly within the body.

www.research.chop.edu

"The research team used lipid nanoparticle (LNP) to deliver the mRNA gene editing tools. LNPs are highly effective at packaging and delivering mRNA to cells and, in 2020, this technology became widely used due to the LNP-mRNA platform for two leading COVID-19 vaccines."

I mean we're right ******* there! You're putting a lot of trust in provably corrupt entities across the board who support these vaccines and mandates and all that.

You know exactly what I am going to ask, where is the actual evidence for the technology, and people that talk about a theory to do something isn't evidence, since it is not actually being used. The paper that you reference themselves says that so I don't get what is so difficult to understand.

I disagree in your general notion that the technology isn't advanced enough to do or be tested to do what they plan and say they want to do to you. Come on, man. Idk how you can't understand that part. That's like saying the military doesn't have any super secret classified weapons. That's what that sounds like to me.

That is speculation, speculation without a foundation is very stupid to do that just my opinion you can disagree with it if you like. Also if technology was that advanced don't you think companies would capitalize on it and sell consumer goods based on it? What company that knows anything about business keeps that tech secret considering how much there is to be made? It is just not a logical argument.

I do disagree with you about some points on mRNA. I mean I've seen diagrams from "official" sources that show the mRNA and what's produced part of it going into the cell nucleus.

There is nothing to disagree you are literally now repeating what I said multiple times. See below

mRNA acts like raw materials, providing essential components like the Cas9 protein and guide RNA in CRISPR-Cas9. These components are manufactured in the cell's cytoplasm and then operate on DNA within the nucleus. The key clarification is that mRNA is a byproduct, not an active agent, in the gene editing process. It's akin to utilizing raw materials to construct a specific tool – the focus is on the tool, not the raw materials themselves that is my issue with the wording of the article. Dirt has many different elements that can be used to build something like a rocket or a computer but you would have someone saying I just attacked you with dirt because thats its original origin.

I never made any notion of mRNA needing to enter the nucleus and instead, I specifically said it couldn't. If you can prove me wrong I implore you to do so.

I am 100% saying covid vaccines were more like a mRNA testing platform for localized regions with different things and amounts in the shots. The vaccines have nothing to do with preventing covid, IMO. You won't convince me otherwise, I have studied so much for so long on this topic I cannot see how these big ******* corrupt govs and pharma and tech corporations aren't using vaccines to genetically alter us.

The vaccine triggers a similar immune response to that of covid. Did it have side effects? Yes. But if you have evidence that says it didn't trigger an immune response similar to that of covid then show it.

You won't convince me otherwise, I have studied so much for so long on this topic I cannot see how these big ******* corrupt govs and pharma and tech corporations aren't using vaccines to genetically alter us.

I find this extremely hypocritical of you to say considering you accused me of having my mind made up.

You're being an arrogant ******* and assuming so much man. Not worth it. You just think you've got a slam dunk here lol. You just keep running and running with it and I haven't really tried to respond hard lol; you've already made up your mind and you already 100% know what I mean with every post where I barely explain anything.

But as I said if I did have my mind made up as you have said then why would I say this below, yet you ignored it.

If I made up my mind, why would I constantly be asking you for evidence? That right there makes your statement illogical. What person who made up their mind would ask for evidence that would go against their view? I even told you to look up everything I said. If I wasn't confident in that view, why would I ask you to do that?

Big pharma having scary viruses is nothing new i think even a Pfizer employee was caught saying how they are artificially mutating the covid virus to get ahead of it and have vaccine ready. I still don't get the point of even bringing this up since the original topic was AI controlling everything.

Also extremely deadly vaccines compared to any vaccines ever released ever, lol. Something else is going on here with bioweapons and biotech and vaccines, I'm telling you. I will not move from this standpoint.

As for the link you posted you do realize this confirms my point it right? "They tested CD117/LNP encapsulating mRNA encoding a Cas9 base editor targeting the mutation that causes sickle cell disease." The article describes a method where mRNA serves as the raw material to produce the Cas9 protein. In this approach, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are used to deliver mRNA gene editing tools to hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow. The LNPs are modified with antibodies to specifically target CD117 receptors on the surface of HSCs. Once inside the cell, the mRNA is expressed, leading to the production of Cas9 protein. Guided by a specifically designed RNA sequence, the produced Cas9 protein then enters the nucleus, facilitating precise gene editing within the bone marrow cells.

I mean we're right ******* there! You're putting a lot of trust in provably corrupt entities across the board who support these vaccines and mandates and all that.

Who exactly have I put my trust in? I mention that I have no interest in defending WHO or WEF nor will you find me defending Pfizer.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Funny how they didn't disqualify him before he became President the first time but now that they see his popularity they will do any and everything they can to "disqualify" him. Also, no stupid. I said the people THE PEOPLE decided who they will vote for. Right now, this far left government is taking that choice away from us.

You think they should have disqualified him before he committed the acts that they are trying to disqualify him for committing?
Interesting concept. Ridiculous, but interesting.

It's interesting that you keep reading things that were never written. Dementia?

That long a reply for two words? Wow.

Stop babbling. Nobody even remotely said anything about our rights regarding the law.

You think someone has a RIGHT to run for POTUS regardless of their history of criminal activity? Interesting.
Tell us more.

As in he is in their way from holding power so they will ruin him to prevent it. I swear you eat lead chips.

He's "in the way" of what? He's not POTUS anymore, no matter what your minimalist mind believes.

Alleged. It's nice that the United States is full of bigoted people like you who pass judgement of guilt just because they don't like someone.

"Alleged" is long by the wayside when someone gets convicted.
Are you not aware that Trump was convicted?
Oh. Well, he was convicted.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I don't tend to blame POTUS for recessions. Ie the great recession wasn't Bush or Obama's fault, same with the pandemic of triggered recession.

I get that. And so you wouldn't blame PTUS for inflation following a recession. But that's rational thought.

Some people will give a POTUS a pass for recession, but then blame the next POTUS for post-recession inflation.
Or when both POTUSs sell oil from the SPR, accuse one of breaking the law, but not the other.

That's biased judgment to the Nth degree.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You know exactly what I am going to ask, where is the actual evidence for the technology, and people that talk about a theory to do something isn't evidence, since it is not actually being used. The paper that you reference themselves says that so I don't get what is so difficult to understand.

That is speculation, speculation without a foundation is very stupid to do that just my opinion you can disagree with it if you like. Also if technology was that advanced don't you think companies would capitalize on it and sell consumer goods based on it? What company that knows anything about business keeps that tech secret considering how much there is to be made? It is just not a logical argument.

There is nothing to disagree you are literally now repeating what I said multiple times. See below

I never made any notion of mRNA needing to enter the nucleus and instead, I specifically said it couldn't. If you can prove me wrong I implore you to do so.

The vaccine triggers a similar immune response to that of covid. Did it have side effects? Yes. But if you have evidence that says it didn't trigger an immune response similar to that of covid then show it.

I find this extremely hypocritical of you to say considering you accused me of having my mind made up.

But as I said if I did have my mind made up as you have said then why would I say this below, yet you ignored it.

Big pharma having scary viruses is nothing new i think even a Pfizer employee was caught saying how they are artificially mutating the covid virus to get ahead of it and have vaccine ready. I still don't get the point of even bringing this up since the original topic was AI controlling everything.

As for the link you posted you do realize this confirms my point it right? "They tested CD117/LNP encapsulating mRNA encoding a Cas9 base editor targeting the mutation that causes sickle cell disease." The article describes a method where mRNA serves as the raw material to produce the Cas9 protein. In this approach, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are used to deliver mRNA gene editing tools to hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow. The LNPs are modified with antibodies to specifically target CD117 receptors on the surface of HSCs. Once inside the cell, the mRNA is expressed, leading to the production of Cas9 protein. Guided by a specifically designed RNA sequence, the produced Cas9 protein then enters the nucleus, facilitating precise gene editing within the bone marrow cells.

Who exactly have I put my trust in? I mention that I have no interest in defending WHO or WEF nor will you find me defending Pfizer.

You’re just here to argue dude. Like you’re doing that same stuff Rob does where you’re trying to force the convo go a way for yourself to be right. You’re arguing points I wasn’t making to be like “oh look I’m right” about a bunch of stuff I didn’t argue in that way or in that context with a lot of this you’re saying. Like you’re throwing in some stuff I think could be correct and acting like I’m against it because you said it that way or something. I’m done. It gets into this dumb I never said that you never said that I never said. Done, just not a good way to have a conversation debate whatever. Nothing against you, but it’s just never gonna work in that/this format.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You’re just here to argue dude. Like you’re doing that same stuff Rob does where you’re trying to force the convo go a way for yourself to be right. You’re arguing points I wasn’t making to be like “oh look I’m right” about a bunch of stuff I didn’t argue in that way or in that context with a lot of this you’re saying. Like you’re throwing in some stuff I think could be correct and acting like I’m against it because you said it that way or something. I’m done. It gets into this dumb I never said that you never said that I never said. Done, just not a good way to have a conversation debate whatever. Nothing against you, but it’s just never gonna work in that/this format.

Says the guy who makes incredibly outlandish claims, then when called on them simply tells everyone they aren't smart enough to understand the magic behind the curtain.

 

[Speed Chaser]

You’re just here to argue dude. Like you’re doing that same stuff Rob does where you’re trying to force the convo go a way for yourself to be right. You’re arguing points I wasn’t making to be like “oh look I’m right” about a bunch of stuff I didn’t argue in that way or in that context with a lot of this you’re saying. Like you’re throwing in some stuff I think could be correct and acting like I’m against it because you said it that way or something. I’m done. It gets into this dumb I never said that you never said that I never said. Done, just not a good way to have a conversation debate whatever. Nothing against you, but it’s just never gonna work in that/this format.

So, you accuse me of arguing for the sake of arguing, yet it was you who initiated this with the AI comment and continues to prolong the supposed argument. You also claim I'm arguing against things you aren't saying, yet I'm directly responding to exactly what you're saying using your own provided resources. You haven't refuted any of my points and instead introduced new topics when I asked for evidence. Now, you compare me to someone else without providing anything to support what you've been saying for like three pages. No one forced you to respond; you did that on your own, so don't get frustrated when asked for evidence. Also, considering how much I disagree with Rob, I find it laughable that you would even attempt to make that comparison. Anyhow, cheers. I'll be here if you ever decide to provide that evidence.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I get that. And so you wouldn't blame PTUS for inflation following a recession. But that's rational thought.

Some people will give a POTUS a pass for recession, but then blame the next POTUS for post-recession inflation.
Or when both POTUSs sell oil from the SPR, accuse one of breaking the law, but not the other.

That's biased judgment to the Nth degree.

But then you're attempting to hold somebody accountable for a double standard. As I've posted before (courtesy of Mike Rosen), behind every double standard is a greater single standard. You have to understand that for many, perhaps most people, facts be damned, standards be damned, the only thing that matters is blaming the bad guys and exonerating the good guys.