Current events discussion

[Speed Chaser]

It's too many things to cover with limited post count. DNA did get changed, Pfizer and liver. I've studied it deeply, the whole subject. mRNA and crispr is the next step.

The Nazis were Aryan type eugenicists with computer systems they used from IBM to help run the concentration camps. Then the OSS/CIA took tons of them in. It's not looney, I mean it is looney, but me talking about it isn't, because the people running the world are ******* nuts and you have no idea how actually ******* dark it is and what these cultists believe in; you're ignorant. These people will enslave you with AI, literally. Ai systems are surrounding you constantly, and they want to get inside of you and connect to your genome so you will be a good slave for big daddy. Absolutely that's the plan. They're already doing lab work on connecting nanobots basically to the internet to do shit inside of your body. It's all been talked about, just research it. It's in development.

View attachment 56996

IBM does vaccine tracking...lol...real shit...AI is a wet dream for evil controllers

It's physically impossible for the vaccine to change DNA; I literally explained how it works mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus where DNA is stored. How do you think it's possible for something to change something that it can't get access to? It seems like you are mixing completely different things. I am not actually against Project Paperclip, contributed to technological advancements, but connecting it directly to modern discussions about AI requires evidence and a clear logical bridge. I think I've asked for evidence about six times now and still haven't gotten anything. You keep proposing the idea of AI being in control of everything without a single shred of evidence. I can keep screaming I can fly; it doesn't mean when I jump off a building, I'll grow wings and magically fly. Now, it's just getting boring and repetitive. You propose a theory, I explain how it actually works, you disagree with it, and I ask you to show me evidence to support your disagreement, and then you go to another point.

I'll say it again: AI does not change the genome. Give me one example of nanobots being connected to the internet that isn't theoretical research and has actually been in the testing phase. It doesn't have to be on a living being; it can be on a petri dish. We are still figuring out locomotion on the nanoscale, and you expect there to be wireless capability with them? VTrckS and RT-VaMA also provide vaccine tracking what is your point?
Saying 'just research' is a lazy thing to demand when the burden of proof is on you since you are making all the claims. How can I research something that doesn't exist?

 

[Speed Chaser]

Typical leftist zero fact just emotion-filled bla blah

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It's physically impossible for the vaccine to change DNA; I literally explained how it works mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus where DNA is stored. How do you think it's possible for something to change something that it can't get access to? It seems like you are mixing completely different things. I am not actually against Project Paperclip, contributed to technological advancements, but connecting it directly to modern discussions about AI requires evidence and a clear logical bridge. I think I've asked for evidence about six times now and still haven't gotten anything. You keep proposing the idea of AI being in control of everything without a single shred of evidence. I can keep screaming I can fly; it doesn't mean when I jump off a building, I'll grow wings and magically fly. Now, it's just getting boring and repetitive. You propose a theory, I explain how it actually works, you disagree with it, and I ask you to show me evidence to support your disagreement, and then you go to another point.

I'll say it again: AI does not change the genome. Give me one example of nanobots being connected to the internet that isn't theoretical research and has actually been in the testing phase. It doesn't have to be on a living being; it can be on a petri dish. We are still figuring out locomotion on the nanoscale, and you expect there to be wireless capability with them? VTrckS and RT-VaMA also provide vaccine tracking what is your point?
Saying 'just research' is a lazy thing to demand when the burden of proof is on you since you are making all the claims. How can I research something that doesn't exist?

You're being an arrogant ******* and assuming so much man. Not worth it. You just think you've got a slam dunk here lol. You just keep running and running with it and I haven't really tried to respond hard lol; you've already made up your mind and you already 100% know what I mean with every post where I barely explain anything. You know all about what I mean when I haven't even had the chance. This stuff isn't easy to research and find, I did a lot of it in the what is thead, and many here know I did, I don't feel like doing at all, especially with you being like this. It's in the covid thread, good luck. If you feel you won something, then congrats

Here's a quickie:

"Just like Internet of Things (IoT), IoB refers to access and control of human body via internet. Here, we detail how CRISPR can be used to electrically connect with the genome and as a proof of concept display control over transcriptional informational networks inside E. coli and Salmonella."

Internet of Bodies (IoB)- Using CRISPR to electrically connect with and control the genome

Just like Internet of Things (IoT), IoB refers to access and control of human body via internet. Here, we detail how CRISPR can be used to electrically connect with the genome and as a proof of concept display control over transcriptional informational networks inside E. coli and Salmonella.

communities.springernature.com

Barely trying man, the attitude with me, drop, I'm not lying. I'm really not trying to be conflict-full, I just don't like this assumed attitude towards me like what I'm saying is completely bonkers, you know?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Hooking people up to the internet is the plan, that's why the WHO pandemic treaty really nice for technocrats. Once the WHO has control of our healthcare, they can force experimental vaccines with God knows what in them inside of you. I think we're living or all exposed to a transhumanist cult. But that's my OPINION.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

"The field of gene editing has received much attention in recent years due to its immense therapeutic potential. In particular, gene editing therapeutics, such as the CRISPR-Cas systems, base editors, and other emerging gene editors, offer the opportunity to address previously untreatable disorders. This review aims to summarize the therapeutic applications of gene editing based on mRNA delivery. We introduce gene editing therapeutics using mRNA and focus on engineering and improvement of gene editing technology. We subsequently examine ex vivoand in vivo gene editing techniques and conclude with an exploration of the next generation of CRISPR and base editing systems."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169409X23003411

It's a complicated subject, so let's not be like super close minded. I'm really not trying to start conflict, I just don't like certain attitudes towards me with certain things. Biotechnology is complicated. I can't immediately prove everything all the time by typing words on an audio forum, you know? So don't expect me to at will lol. This should be close enough to at least open your mind to the possibilities, these two things I've posted.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The guy who cries when I paint Republicans with a broad brush sure likes to paint Democrats with abroad brush.

Democrats are cowards because they have no interest in having a piece of garbage convicted criminal in the highest office in the country?
Interesting.

I guess you're a coward if you won't play Russian roulette? A coward if you don't hand a stranger your bank info and truest them? A coward if you lock your car doors at night in NYC?

You have Trump Sycophant Syndrome.
Your head is so far up his ***, you can't even see the reality of what he is.

Damn you are stupid. I said "Modern Democrats". Pretty specific brush. Look at your comment...
"Democrats are cowards because they have no interest in having a piece of garbage convicted criminal in the highest office in the country?"
No, you idiot. They are cowards because instead of facing someone they don't like fairly like grownups they are trying to ruin his life and they are trying to keep him from being able to run against them. Is that what this country stands for Rob. If we don't think we can beat someone fairly in an election we make sure that person can't run for election no matter what, that way they can win by default?

Colorado - Left leaning
Maine - Left leaning
Illinois - Left leaning

Cowards because they are not letting the PEOPLE decide who they want. Like a dumbass you will attempt to insult me by saying my head is up Trumps *** or I have TSS. It has nothing to do with Trump. It has to do with these assholes taking our choices away from us. For some reason you are 100% on board with having NO RIGHTS and just letting them make all the decisions for us.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Damn you are stupid. I said "Modern Democrats". Pretty specific brush. Look at your comment...
"Democrats are cowards because they have no interest in having a piece of garbage convicted criminal in the highest office in the country?"
No, you idiot. They are cowards because instead of facing someone they don't like fairly like grownups they are trying to ruin his life and they are trying to keep him from being able to run against them. Is that what this country stands for Rob. If we don't think we can beat someone fairly in an election we make sure that person can't run for election no matter what, that way they can win by default?

Colorado - Left leaning
Maine - Left leaning
Illinois - Left leaning

Cowards because they are not letting the PEOPLE decide who they want. Like a dumbass you will attempt to insult me by saying my head is up Trumps *** or I have TSS. It has nothing to do with Trump. It has to do with these assholes taking our choices away from us. For some reason you are 100% on board with having NO RIGHTS and just letting them make all the decisions for us.

So you think that even if Trump is ineligible BY LAW to run, the Republicans should decide whether he can run or not?

That's interesting.

Since when did it become "our right" to just arbitrarily decide when the laws apply to a person or a situation?
If a twice-elected POTUS decides they want a third term, is it "our right" to decide they can?

"Ruin his life". Interesting choice of phrase. The same one you used to describe when I stop people from committing welfare fraud.
If Trump is the one committing crimes, isn't HE the one ruining his own life?
Or is he SUPPOSED to be able to do those things, simply because you want it that way?

 

[Speed Chaser]

You're being an arrogant ******* and assuming so much man. Not worth it. You've just think you've got a slam dunk here lol. You just keep running and running with it and I haven't really tried to respond hard lol; you've already made up your mind and you already 100% know what I mean with every post where I barely explain anything. You know all about what I mean when I haven't even had the chance. This stuff isn't easy to research and find, I did a lot of it in the what is thead, and many here know I did, I don't feel like doing at all, especially with you being like this. It's in the covid thread, good luck. If you feel you won something, then congrats

Here's a quickie:

"Just like Internet of Things (IoT), IoB refers to access and control of human body via internet. Here, we detail how CRISPR can be used to electrically connect with the genome and as a proof of concept display control over transcriptional informational networks inside E. coli and Salmonella."

Internet of Bodies (IoB)- Using CRISPR to electrically connect with and control the genome

Just like Internet of Things (IoT), IoB refers to access and control of human body via internet. Here, we detail how CRISPR can be used to electrically connect with the genome and as a proof of concept display control over transcriptional informational networks inside E. coli and Salmonella.

communities.springernature.com

Barely trying man, the attitude with me, drop, I'm not lying. I'm really not trying to be conflict-full, I just don't like this assumed attitude towards me like what I'm saying is completely bonkers, you know?

Aww, are you gonna go cry now? Geez, isn't it embarrassing when grown adults can't handle their temper when they are cornered with facts? Yeah, it isn't worth it because you don't have any evidence to back your paranoid garbage. You accused me of assuming stuff. I asked you what you think I assume since I was responding directly to your statements? You accused me of controlling your speech and thinking. I asked you how? Did you answer? Nope. If I made up my mind, why would I constantly be asking you for evidence? That right there makes your statement illogical. What person who made up their mind would ask for evidence that would go against their view? I even told you to look up everything I said. If I wasn't confident in that view, why would I ask you to do that? You accuse me of having a feel about this? Yet, this entire conversation has been a trivial conversation when only one side is actually bringing real-life evidence to back what they're saying, versus someone clearly putting emotion into their response. It's obvious you're emotional when you think someone asking you for evidence is some kind of competition. so once again you changed your topic ok so here is the actual report and not a summary https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-16249-x.pdf they are using biology to create a transmitter in cells in simplest terms and in more complex terms of the actual process it uses redox reactions, which involve the transfer of electrons, to transmit electronic information directly to cells via electrode-activated redox mediators. The transmitted information is then decoded by redox-responsive promoters, which allow for user-specified control over biological functions. Ok, now we just need the svengali AI that for some reason has a fetish to enslave humanity. If AI was really was intelligent to really be controlling everyone like puppets don't you think it would just eradicate humans, to begin with considering how inefficient they are why would it even worry about transferring humans into digital information so it can have irrational human emotions interfering with its logic-based method of thinking?

"The field of gene editing has received much attention in recent years due to its immense therapeutic potential. In particular, gene editing therapeutics, such as the CRISPR-Cas systems, base editors, and other emerging gene editors, offer the opportunity to address previously untreatable disorders. This review aims to summarize the therapeutic applications of gene editing based on mRNA delivery. We introduce gene editing therapeutics using mRNA and focus on engineering and improvement of gene editing technology. We subsequently examine ex vivoand in vivo gene editing techniques and conclude with an exploration of the next generation of CRISPR and base editing systems."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169409X23003411

It's a complicated subject, so let's not be like super close minded. I'm really not trying to start conflict, I just don't like certain attitudes towards me with certain things. Biotechnology is complicated. I can't immediately prove everything all the time by typing words on an audio forum, you know? So don't expect me to at will lol. This should be close enough to at least open your mind to the possibilities, these two things I've posted.

I assume you posted this in reference to vaccines using mRNA, but do you actually understand the link between CRISPR and mRNA? mRNA is used to produce the necessary components, such as the Cas9 protein and the guide RNA in the case of CRISPR-Cas9, within the cell’s cytoplasm. These components then act on the DNA within the nucleus, mRNA never goes back into the nucleus.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You're being an arrogant ******* and assuming so much man. Not worth it. You just think you've got a slam dunk here lol. You just keep running and running with it and I haven't really tried to respond hard lol; you've already made up your mind and you already 100% know what I mean with every post where I barely explain anything. You know all about what I mean when I haven't even had the chance. This stuff isn't easy to research and find, I did a lot of it in the what is thead, and many here know I did, I don't feel like doing at all, especially with you being like this. It's in the covid thread, good luck. If you feel you won something, then congrats

Here's a quickie:

"Just like Internet of Things (IoT), IoB refers to access and control of human body via internet. Here, we detail how CRISPR can be used to electrically connect with the genome and as a proof of concept display control over transcriptional informational networks inside E. coli and Salmonella."

Internet of Bodies (IoB)- Using CRISPR to electrically connect with and control the genome

Just like Internet of Things (IoT), IoB refers to access and control of human body via internet. Here, we detail how CRISPR can be used to electrically connect with the genome and as a proof of concept display control over transcriptional informational networks inside E. coli and Salmonella.

communities.springernature.com

Barely trying man, the attitude with me, drop, I'm not lying. I'm really not trying to be conflict-full, I just don't like this assumed attitude towards me like what I'm saying is completely bonkers, you know?

The stuff you post here is bonkers.
If you truly believe it, that makes you by default bonkers.

Comes with the territory.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Aww, are you gonna go cry now? Geez, isn't it embarrassing when grown adults can't handle their temper when they are cornered with facts? Yeah, it isn't worth it because you don't have any evidence to back your paranoid garbage. You accused me of assuming stuff. I asked you what you think I assume since I was responding directly to your statements? You accused me of controlling your speech and thinking. I asked you how? Did you answer? Nope. If I made up my mind, why would I constantly be asking you for evidence? That right there makes your statement illogical. What person who made up their mind would ask for evidence that would go against their view? I even told you to look up everything I said. If I wasn't confident in that view, why would I ask you to do that? You accuse me of having a feel about this? Yet, this entire conversation has been a trivial conversation when only one side is actually bringing real-life evidence to back what they're saying, versus someone clearly putting emotion into their response. It's obvious you're emotional when you think someone asking you for evidence is some kind of competition. so once again you changed your topic ok so here is the actual report and not a summary https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-16249-x.pdf they are using biology to create a transmitter in cells in simplest terms and in more complex terms of the actual process it uses redox reactions, which involve the transfer of electrons, to transmit electronic information directly to cells via electrode-activated redox mediators. The transmitted information is then decoded by redox-responsive promoters, which allow for user-specified control over biological functions. Ok, now we just need the svengali AI that for some reason has a fetish to enslave humanity. If AI was really was intelligent to really be controlling everyone like puppets don't you think it would just eradicate humans, to begin with considering how inefficient they are why would it even worry about transferring humans into digital information so it can have irrational human emotions interfering with its logic-based method of thinking?

I assume you posted this in reference to vaccines using mRNA, but do you actually understand the link between CRISPR and mRNA? mRNA is used to produce the necessary components, such as the Cas9 protein and the guide RNA in the case of CRISPR-Cas9, within the cell’s cytoplasm. These components then act on the DNA within the nucleus, mRNA never goes back into the nucleus.

Yeah but you're like arguing things in a way I don't mean with the way I say them. It is emotional because transhumanism is here, it's a turning point in the road for the rest of humanity. We're risking losing control of our own health and genetics to an evil class of ruling elite over the world; international order, like the WEF. It's not the AI that has a fetish, it's the people controlling the AI. Just like any dictator or crazy gov wanting to rule the entire world, it's the perfect tool. From what I've read, the MRNA doesn't have to go into the nucleus; the mRNA can create a new protein that goes into the nucleus. That's the thing about mRNA is that it's a platform technology, and you just hope they're being honest with what they're doing about this, considering all the mRNA vaccines are officially experimental by law, approved only under emergency authorization. What you're saying doesn't make what I'm saying not true.

So am I wrong about them using nanotech or biotech or however you want to label that to connect people to the internet?

"Biosensors-based devices are transforming medical diagnosis of diseases and monitoring of patient signals. The development of smart and automated molecular diagnostic tools equipped with biomedical big data analysis, cloud computing and medical artificial intelligence can be an ideal approach for the detection and monitoring of diseases, precise therapy, and storage of data over the cloud for supportive decisions. This review focused on the use of machine learning approaches for the development of futuristic CRISPR-biosensors based on microchips and the use of Internet of Things for wireless transmission of signals over the cloud for support decision making. The present review also discussed the discovery of CRISPR, its usage as a gene editing tool, and the CRISPR-based biosensors...."

Futuristic CRISPR-based biosensing in the cloud and internet of things era: an overview - PMC

Biosensors-based devices are transforming medical diagnosis of diseases and monitoring of patient signals. The development of smart and automated molecular diagnostic tools equipped with biomedical big data analysis, cloud computing and medical ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

You ask why I'm emotional while also saying I'm posting paranoid garbage. That's just ***. That's what I mean with you trying to control my speech lol. I'm repeating what these people's plans are. This is already coming and we don't know what big pharma tech is being honest about or not. Pfizer has killed a lot of people, not like they care, they have millions of idiots to test on for free (actually you're paying them to experiment on you for profit in their end) thanks to EUA of covid vaccines with basically legal immunity to any health damage based lawsuits

Honestly you seem smart enough with this that you should understand what I'm saying without a problem

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The NBER said that there was recession under Trump: https://www.nber.org/research/business-cycle-dating

As for who is to "blame", we should be applying the same standards to each POTUS.
If Trump is not responsible for recession, then Biden is not responsible for post-recession inflation. And vice versa.

Regardless of who is to "blame", these are events that actually have happened. Just like the surge in border crossings during Trump.
People seem to want to deny history in order to keep their narrative alive.
Makes them look quite dumb.

I don't tend to blame POTUS for recessions. Ie the great recession wasn't Bush or Obama's fault, same with the pandemic of triggered recession.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It's too many things to cover with limited post count. DNA did get changed, Pfizer and liver. I've studied it deeply, the whole subject. mRNA and crispr is the next step.

The Nazis were Aryan type eugenicists with computer systems they used from IBM to help run the concentration camps. Then the OSS/CIA took tons of them in. It's not looney, I mean it is looney, but me talking about it isn't, because the people running the world are ******* nuts and you have no idea how actually ******* dark it is and what these cultists believe in; you're ignorant. These people will enslave you with AI, literally. Ai systems are surrounding you constantly, and they want to get inside of you and connect to your genome so you will be a good slave for big daddy. Absolutely that's the plan. They're already doing lab work on connecting nanobots basically to the internet to do shit inside of your body. It's all been talked about, just research it. It's in development.

View attachment 56996

IBM does vaccine tracking...lol...real shit...AI is a wet dream for evil controllers

They're enslaving us now??? I thought we were getting replaced with robots and "they" were going to depopulate the planet.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You ask why I'm emotional while also saying I'm posting paranoid garbage. That's just ***. That's what I mean with you trying to control my speech lol. I'm repeating what these people's plans are. This is already coming and we don't know what big pharma tech is being honest about or not. Pfizer has killed a lot of people, not like they care, they have millions of idiots to test on for free (actually you're paying them to experiment on you for profit in their end) thanks to EUA of covid vaccines with basically legal immunity to any health damage based lawsuits

Honestly you seem smart enough with this that you should understand what I'm saying without a problem

Claiming what you post is "paranoid garbage" isn't controlling your speech. Everybody has said something similar to somebody else in these threads and sure as heck isn't "controlling" anyone's speech...

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It's physically impossible for the vaccine to change DNA; I literally explained how it works mRNA doesn't enter the nucleus where DNA is stored. How do you think it's possible for something to change something that it can't get access to? It seems like you are mixing completely different things. I am not actually against Project Paperclip, contributed to technological advancements, but connecting it directly to modern discussions about AI requires evidence and a clear logical bridge. I think I've asked for evidence about six times now and still haven't gotten anything. You keep proposing the idea of AI being in control of everything without a single shred of evidence. I can keep screaming I can fly; it doesn't mean when I jump off a building, I'll grow wings and magically fly. Now, it's just getting boring and repetitive. You propose a theory, I explain how it actually works, you disagree with it, and I ask you to show me evidence to support your disagreement, and then you go to another point.

I'll say it again: AI does not change the genome. Give me one example of nanobots being connected to the internet that isn't theoretical research and has actually been in the testing phase. It doesn't have to be on a living being; it can be on a petri dish. We are still figuring out locomotion on the nanoscale, and you expect there to be wireless capability with them? VTrckS and RT-VaMA also provide vaccine tracking what is your point?
Saying 'just research' is a lazy thing to demand when the burden of proof is on you since you are making all the claims. How can I research something that doesn't exist?

He can't make the connection because it's a global conspiracy that goes back to ancient Egypt. IIRC, Amun Ra (the diety) was somehow involved. IIRC, Ra's/their DNA was somehow injected into the humans, perhaps using that cathode ray tube looking thing. I can't remember if Ra (and company) is one of the good guys or bad guys. It's all very convoluted, but ultimately, like most conspiracy theories, it's the lack of evidence that proves there is indeed a conspiracy.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So you think that even if Trump is ineligible BY LAW to run, the Republicans should decide whether he can run or not?

Funny how they didn't disqualify him before he became President the first time but now that they see his popularity they will do any and everything they can to "disqualify" him. Also, no stupid. I said the people THE PEOPLE decided who they will vote for. Right now, this far left government is taking that choice away from us.

That's interesting.

It's interesting that you keep reading things that were never written. Dementia?

Since when did it become "our right" to just arbitrarily decide when the laws apply to a person or a situation?
If a twice-elected POTUS decides they want a third term, is it "our right" to decide they can?

Stop babbling. Nobody even remotely said anything about our rights regarding the law.

"Ruin his life". Interesting choice of phrase. The same one you used to describe when I stop people from committing welfare fraud.

As in he is in their way from holding power so they will ruin him to prevent it. I swear you eat lead chips.

If Trump is the one committing crimes, isn't HE the one ruining his own life?
Or is he SUPPOSED to be able to do those things, simply because you want it that way?

Alleged. It's nice that the United States is full of bigoted people like you who pass judgement of guilt just because they don't like someone.