Current events discussion

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 56945

You're in the minority Rob

It's odd that the minority of the country wants a good economy.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 56945

You're in the minority Rob

I guess there's a shit-ton of people in the country who prefer a bad economy.

Must be all the welfare recipients who get the same benefits no matter how the economy goes. Fixed income, and all that.

Cute graphic, too. A year old, with a 99% margin of error.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob... You are one delusional person. Now where, except for your media choices and democrat lords, say there was a recession under Trump. Trump bought back industry to the US. That's how you avoid a recession. Stop reading your "pick-and-chose" garbage and take an economics course.

Along with every economist in the world, I'd agree we went into recession under Trump. Have you been asleep the past five years?
Tell me which detail they got wrong, or is it just the detail that says we went into recession under Trump, and you don't like that detail?
"After a year of global economic slowdown that saw stagnation of economic growth and consumer activity, the COVID-19 lockdownsand other precautions taken in early 2020 drove the global economy into crisis.Within seven months, every advanced economy had fallen to recession."

COVID-19 recession - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Did you live somewhere without an advanced economy?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Far left leaning economist or non-biased economist Rob?

It's funny how you think mathematics can have a political preference.

A left winger thinks 5 is greater than 4, and 7 plus 3 equals ten.
What does a right-winger think of those numbers?
Tell us more about how the stats of our economy have been faked since 1947 in order to make Trump look bad.

Economists Agree: Democratic Presidents are Better at Making Us Rich. Eight Reasons Why. - Evonomics

Wisdom of the Crowds. Preventing Government Capture. Labor Market Flexibility. Freedom to Innovate. Profitable Investments in Long-Term Growth. Power to the Producers. Fiscal Prudence. Labor and Trade Efficiencies.

evonomics.com

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It's funny how you think mathematics can have a political preference.

A left winger thinks 5 is greater than 4, and 7 plus 3 equals ten.
What does a right-winger think of those numbers?
Tell us more about how the stats of our economy have been faked since 1947 in order to make Trump look bad.

Economists Agree: Democratic Presidents are Better at Making Us Rich. Eight Reasons Why. - Evonomics

Wisdom of the Crowds. Preventing Government Capture. Labor Market Flexibility. Freedom to Innovate. Profitable Investments in Long-Term Growth. Power to the Producers. Fiscal Prudence. Labor and Trade Efficiencies.

evonomics.com

I love your simple view of the world. So wonderful and

So apparently it never occurred to you oh seeker of fraud that people may not report all the numbers or just enough numbers to support their narrative. The math may indeed be correct for what numbers they choose to use.

So cute and naive. You little kiddo you.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I love your simple view of the world. So wonderful and

So apparently it never occurred to you oh seeker of fraud that people may not report all the numbers or just enough numbers to support their narrative. The math may indeed be correct for what numbers they choose to use.

So cute and naive. You little kiddo you.

Yes. Since 1947 all the miners are being g fudged to make Trump look bad, and not a single person except you has caught on.

If that's the case, then you're saying the entire Republican Party is incredibly inept, and by necessity fudging the numbers.

So now you've discovered the economy is completely wrong, all of medical science is confused, mathematics is tipsy turkey, the OED is incorrect.

With the insane amount of knowledge you claim to have, why don't all the experts defer to you?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yes. Since 1947 all the miners are being g fudged to make Trump look bad, and not a single person except you has caught on.

If that's the case, then you're saying the entire Republican Party is incredibly inept, and by necessity fudging the numbers.

So now you've discovered the economy is completely wrong, all of medical science is confused, mathematics is tipsy turkey, the OED is incorrect.

With the insane amount of knowledge you claim to have, why don't all the experts defer to you?

I am saying you always say the math don't lie. That is true but it can be manipulated. Why are you being so blind?

If the "expert" is biased to the left... are they still an expert to be trusted?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am saying you always say the math don't lie. That is true but it can be manipulated. Why are you being so blind?

If the "expert" is biased to the left... are they still an expert to be trusted?

If "math manipulation" is going to be your go-to for why the economy has been better under Dems since 1947, then tell us the how and the why it was done.

If you simply want to say it's possible, tell us the how and the why it could be done, without anyone catching on.

If you simply want to say it's possible and contribute nothing else, I'd ask why waste your time posting here?

It's POSSIBLE that Trumps father was in the KKK. It don't mean fvckall with regard to DT's fraud convictions, so why bother to bring it up in that context?

Are you saying every economist is biased to the left since 1947, and no right-winger is smart enough to notice?
Well, that tells us we don't want them involved in managing our country, huh?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If "math manipulation" is going to be your go-to for why the economy has been better under Dems since 1947, then tell us the how and the why it was done.

If you simply want to say it's possible, tell us the how and the why it could be done, without anyone catching on.

If you simply want to say it's possible and contribute nothing else, I'd ask why waste your time posting here?

It's POSSIBLE that Trumps father was in the KKK. It don't mean fvckall with regard to DT's fraud convictions, so why bother to bring it up in that context?

Are you saying every economist is biased to the left since 1947, and no right-winger is smart enough to notice?
Well, that tells us we don't want them involved in managing our country, huh?

I am simply saying that YOU tend to just accept numbers especially when they support your argument. You know damn well how much fraud is out there and how much people lie but you never seem to question the left. As for your little rant here... take it easy man. You aren't changing the world by virtue signaling.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am simply saying that YOU tend to just accept numbers especially when they support your argument. You know damn well how much fraud is out there and how much people lie but you never seem to question the left. As for your little rant here... take it easy man. You aren't changing the world by virtue signaling.

And you're still hanging on the assumption that all of the economic statistics in history are created and maintained by the "left".
It's like the whole election, denial stupidity. A bunch of freaking idiots really think that the only possible outcome to the election would be a win for Trump, otherwise, it's been rigged.

If that's the case, then it's not even a freaking election.

It's amazing that you don't even understand that Republicans are able to go to school and get an education, and study things like the economy.

Do you even know what "virtue signaling" means? Do you think that it Hass to do with looking at data and comparing data, and doing things like due diligence and critical? Thinking when making a decision?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

so why bother to bring it up in that context?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 56950

Captain irrelevant jumps on the scene to help Thx.
And fails.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Captain irrelevant jumps on the scene to help Thx.
And fails.

You're the Queen of not keeping things in context.