Current events discussion

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Just as I thought.... no comprehension.

You are literally the child who covers his eyes and thinks it makes him invisible.

You can't use the proper words to express your thoughts, and then you blame others when they read the words with their proper meaning.
(while stomping your feet and crying) "You should have KNOWN I wanted a chocolate chip cookie when I said OREOS!!!"
The few brain cells that you have left IF ANY are completely useless.

See what I did there? By saying "IF ANY" I was suggesting that there were pretty much no brain cells.
Just like you suggested there was pretty much no jet fuel left after the initial fireball.

Words are important. How they are used is important.

yea I know he lives in his own delusional world and brings up concepts he doesn't understand.

The post above yours is a guy who will die here claiming there are no nerves in bones. And you think I'M the delusional one?
That's pretty hilarious; not gonna lie!

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I don't know how to explain it differently. Bone, the physical hard structure is like a cinder block with the holes in it wrapped in an electric blanket, the periosteum. Similar to how a water hose can go through the holes in the block so can the blood vessels in regards to bone. The electricity in the blanket is like the nerves in the periosteum. Crack the cinder block and you can damage the water hose and the blanket. Crack the bone and you can damage the blood vessels as well as the periosteum where the nerves are. The cinder block itself has no nerves in the structure. The are around it in the periosteum and through it in the haversian canals "holes in the cinder blocks"

By all means, argue with me about it or go speak with doctors.

You say MY analogies ****, and then you try to compare a cinderblock (which is about 25% empty air space) and an electric blanket to human bone?
Holy sh*t, this is rich.

If you want to compare anything in construction to human bone, it could be concrete poured over a lattice of rebar, or maybe even tensioned wire (in the case of a floating slab, like in a parking garage).

The rebar or the wires would be representative of the nerves.
Where is the rebar lattice or the wire? It's IN the concrete.

But let's go a step further and closer to the concept of bone: A hard but permeable structure with a soft core. What could that be? A tree!

A tree has the hard outer wood, and the soft heartwood at the center.
Where is the heartwood? IN the tree. Right IN the middle.
What else is IN the tree? The pith, the vascular system, sapwood, and more.

Only a fekking moron would try to argue that those things aren't IN a tree, yet here you are still arguing that nerves surrounded by bone are not IN bone.

Honestly, every argument you present in trying to prove your belief is dumber than the last. And it makes you APPEAR even less intelligent with each attempt.

I asked a doctor. Since you would say I'm lying no matter what answer she gave me, I asked her to give me some resources. Here are several.
Tell us all which part of the info medical science got wrong and why, and how YOU have it right while they are all still confused.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Trump can't even get it right when Laura Ingraham tries to save him from himself.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You say MY analogies ****, and then you try to compare a cinderblock (which is about 25% empty air space) and an electric blanket to human bone?
Holy sh*t, this is rich.

If you want to compare anything in construction to human bone, it could be concrete poured over a lattice of rebar, or maybe even tensioned wire (in the case of a floating slab, like in a parking garage).

The rebar or the wires would be representative of the nerves.
Where is the rebar lattice or the wire? It's IN the concrete.

But let's go a step further and closer to the concept of bone: A hard but permeable structure with a soft core. What could that be? A tree!

A tree has the hard outer wood, and the soft heartwood at the center.
Where is the heartwood? IN the tree. Right IN the middle.
What else is IN the tree? The pith, the vascular system, sapwood, and more.

Only a fekking moron would try to argue that those things aren't IN a tree, yet here you are still arguing that nerves surrounded by bone are not IN bone.

Honestly, every argument you present in trying to prove your belief is dumber than the last. And it makes you APPEAR even less intelligent with each attempt.

I asked a doctor. Since you would say I'm lying no matter what answer she gave me, I asked her to give me some resources. Here are several.
Tell us all which part of the info medical science got wrong and why, and how YOU have it right while they are all still confused. View attachment 56870View attachment 56871View attachment 56872View attachment 56873View attachment 56874

Why??? Seriously why? I actually posted medical imaging showing the nerves in the bones. Thx has even gone as far as to claim there are no pipes in my walls.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You say MY analogies ****, and then you try to compare a cinderblock (which is about 25% empty air space) and an electric blanket to human bone?
Holy sh*t, this is rich.

If you want to compare anything in construction to human bone, it could be concrete poured over a lattice of rebar, or maybe even tensioned wire (in the case of a floating slab, like in a parking garage).

The rebar or the wires would be representative of the nerves.
Where is the rebar lattice or the wire? It's IN the concrete.

But let's go a step further and closer to the concept of bone: A hard but permeable structure with a soft core. What could that be? A tree!

A tree has the hard outer wood, and the soft heartwood at the center.
Where is the heartwood? IN the tree. Right IN the middle.
What else is IN the tree? The pith, the vascular system, sapwood, and more.

Only a fekking moron would try to argue that those things aren't IN a tree, yet here you are still arguing that nerves surrounded by bone are not IN bone.

Honestly, every argument you present in trying to prove your belief is dumber than the last. And it makes you APPEAR even less intelligent with each attempt.

I asked a doctor. Since you would say I'm lying no matter what answer she gave me, I asked her to give me some resources. Here are several.
Tell us all which part of the info medical science got wrong and why, and how YOU have it right while they are all still confused. View attachment 56870View attachment 56871View attachment 56872View attachment 56873View attachment 56874

Like I said, you can copy and paste all day long and you can't comprehend any of it. Just move on Rob. 90% of your argument is about things going through bones. You refuse to comprehend because you want to argue and like always, think you are right because you googled something.

FFS you keep regurgitating innervation!!!! Yes, nerves can GO TO BONE, they can touch the bone, when the bone breaks it will excite the nerve touching it causing pain. You want to continue to use the word "IN" ambiguously to argue. Fine, you want to use it that way I will dumb it down for you. If the nerve is in the bone it is because it is passing through a hollow in the bone and if it terminates in one of these hollows it will terminate on the surface of that hollow. The nerve is not inside of the hard part of bones structure which is mostly calcium phosphate. The nerves will always terminate on a surface be it through a passage, inside a passage or on the outer surface.

Run speaker wires (nerves) inside of a box to your subwoofers voice coil (bones). Are the speaker wires "in" the voice coil? No, they are touching the terminals sending signals to and from them. If the voice coil (bones) breaks there will be an interruption of the signal in the wires (nerves).

I know the monoblock amp threw you for a loop, hopefully this doesn't.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Iran Sends Russia Hundreds Of Ballistic Missiles, Washington Powerless | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Like I said, you can copy and paste all day long and you can't comprehend any of it. Just move on Rob.

Like I said, you can copy and paste all day long and you can't comprehend any of it. Just move on Rob. 90% of your argument is about things going through bones. You refuse to comprehend because you want to argue and like always, think you are right because you googled something.

"Copy and paste" is useless unless you can understand it when someone asks more about what you pasted.
Just ask the guy who can't tell us the stoichiometric ratio he kept posting about earlier. He found a word and ran with it, but it buried him as soon as he was challenged.
Then, tell us more about a hollow concrete block with an electric blanket around it and how it could ever be compared to bones. Most ridiculous analogy yet.

FFS you keep regurgitating innervation!!!! Yes, nerves can GO TO BONE, they can touch the bone, when the bone breaks it will excite the nerve touching it causing pain. You want to continue to use the word "IN" ambiguously to argue. Fine, you want to use it that way I will dumb it down for you. If the nerve is in the bone it is because it is passing through a hollow in the bone and if it terminates in one of these hollows it will terminate on the surface of that hollow. The nerve is not inside of the hard part of bones structure which is mostly calcium phosphate. The nerves will always terminate on a surface be it through a passage, inside a passage or on the outer surface.

Let's keep it simple. The word "innervation" means: "The word innervate sounds like what it is — it means to “put the nerves into” https://www.vocabulary.com/dictiona...Vate," accent,they innervate the muscle fiber.
INTO - A very important word in that definition. "INTO" means - "expressing movement or action with the result that someone or something becomes enclosed or surrounded by something else."
IN - Another important one here. "used as a function word to indicate inclusion, location, or position within limits - in the lake"....."to or toward the inside especially of a house or other building - come in"....." within a particular place" ("within" meaning "inside or not further than a particular area or space; "inside" meaning "the inner part; the interior").
The deeper you dig, the harder it is to actually avoid the fact that bones have nerves IN them.
They are not hollow tubes like a straw or a concrete block. They are far more like a tree or a tree branch.

But let's forget cinder blocks, electric blankets, even trees.
Let's stick to the body.

Do you think we have bones IN our body, or just "passing through" the "hollow" core that is our skin?
Do we have blood IN or veins and arteries, or just "passing through" the hollow tubes?
Is our brain IN our skull, or just "floating near" it?
Is our heart IN the chest area defined by the spine/ribcage/sternum, or just "passing through" it?
Is there marrow IN our bones, or just "passing through" a big hollow cavity of calcium?
Do we have masticated food IN our digestive tract, or just "passing through" it?
Do you put food IN your mouth, or does it just "pass through" on the way to "passing through" the digestive tract?
Do we have pulp IN our teeth, or is it just "passing through" them? Where do they put a filling? "Passing through"?
Do we have alveoli IN our lungs, or just passing through?
Is there bile IN our gallbladder, or is it just "passing through"?

Sorry kid, but there is absolutely nothing you will be able to do that will prove your belief there are no nerves in bones.
Regardless of how much the others here may hate me, they are all rolling their eyes at your posts, and thinking something like "STFU already. You are only making your situation WORSE by doubling and tripling down on something you clearly do NOT understand".

But I may be completely wrong about this basic fact of anatomy.
In fact, if anyone here wants to join you in your belief and they can provide the proof that you simply cannot, I will take a month off from posting.
Hell, if YOU can provide proof that bones do not have nerves in them, I will take a month off.
DEAL?

Run speaker wires (nerves) inside of a box to your subwoofers voice coil (bones). Are the speaker wires "in" the voice coil? No, they are touching the terminals sending signals to and from them. If the voice coil (bones) breaks there will be an interruption of the signal in the wires (nerves).

Another terrible analogy. The copper wire is wrapped around the OUTSIDE of the hollow former to make the voice coil.
If you want to use a speaker as your example, we can try that. Looking at these pictures, please tell me the location of the amplifier, the insulation, the wires, and each speaker driver when the box is complete and able to be used.
Be specific. WHERE are those things located.

I know the monoblock amp threw you for a loop, hopefully this doesn't.

Sorry kid, but your memory is your downfall once again.
YOU are the guy who is claiming a monoblock amp with a terminal strip on the outside is "bridged internally".
Tell us all how I faked these snaps and you "never" said (and never continued to say) such nonsense.

Why does this stuff continue to come up? Because EVERY time you make yet another incorrect claim, try to tapdance away from being wrong, or flat-out lie, it throws you further down the hole of not being credible.
You already have no credibility as far as I'm concerned, but new people might not know how ridiculous you really are, and actually believe some of your nonsense.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"Copy and paste" is useless unless you can understand it when someone asks more about what you pasted.
Just ask the guy who can't tell us the stoichiometric ratio he kept posting about earlier. He found a word and ran with it, but it buried him as soon as he was challenged.
Then, tell us more about a hollow concrete block with an electric blanket around it and how it could ever be compared to bones. Most ridiculous analogy yet.

Let's keep it simple. The word "innervation" means: "The word innervate sounds like what it is — it means to “put the nerves into” https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/innervate#:~:text=It's pronounced “inNERVate," accent,they innervate the muscle fiber.
INTO - A very important word in that definition. "INTO" means - "expressing movement or action with the result that someone or something becomes enclosed or surrounded by something else."
IN - Another important one here. "used as a function word to indicate inclusion, location, or position within limits - in the lake"....."to or toward the inside especially of a house or other building - come in"....." within a particular place" ("within" meaning "inside or not further than a particular area or space; "inside" meaning "the inner part; the interior").
The deeper you dig, the harder it is to actually avoid the fact that bones have nerves IN them.
They are not hollow tubes like a straw or a concrete block. They are far more like a tree or a tree branch.

But let's forget cinder blocks, electric blankets, even trees.
Let's stick to the body.

Do you think we have bones IN our body, or just "passing through" the "hollow" core that is our skin?
Do we have blood IN or veins and arteries, or just "passing through" the hollow tubes?
Is our brain IN our skull, or just "floating near" it?
Is our heart IN the chest area defined by the spine/ribcage/sternum, or just "passing through" it?
Is there marrow IN our bones, or just "passing through" a big hollow cavity of calcium?
Do we have masticated food IN our digestive tract, or just "passing through" it?
Do you put food IN your mouth, or does it just "pass through" on the way to "passing through" the digestive tract?
Do we have pulp IN our teeth, or is it just "passing through" them? Where do they put a filling? "Passing through"?
Do we have alveoli IN our lungs, or just passing through?
Is there bile IN our gallbladder, or is it just "passing through"?

Sorry kid, but there is absolutely nothing you will be able to do that will prove your belief there are no nerves in bones.
Regardless of how much the others here may hate me, they are all rolling their eyes at your posts, and thinking something like "STFU already. You are only making your situation WORSE by doubling and tripling down on something you clearly do NOT understand".

But I may be completely wrong about this basic fact of anatomy.
In fact, if anyone here wants to join you in your belief and they can provide the proof that you simply cannot, I will take a month off from posting.
Hell, if YOU can provide proof that bones do not have nerves in them, I will take a month off.
DEAL?


Another terrible analogy. The copper wire is wrapped around the OUTSIDE of the hollow former to make the voice coil.
If you want to use a speaker as your example, we can try that. Looking at these pictures, please tell me the location of the amplifier, the insulation, the wires, and each speaker driver when the box is complete and able to be used.
Be specific. WHERE are those things located.
View attachment 56876 View attachment 56877View attachment 56878






Sorry kid, but your memory is your downfall once again.
YOU are the guy who is claiming a monoblock amp with a terminal strip on the outside is "bridged internally".
Tell us all how I faked these snaps and you "never" said (and never continued to say) such nonsense.
View attachment 56879
View attachment 56880

View attachment 56881


Why does this stuff continue to come up? Because EVERY time you make yet another incorrect claim, try to tapdance away from being wrong, or flat-out lie, it throws you further down the hole of not being credible.
You already have no credibility as far as I'm concerned, but new people might not know how ridiculous you really are, and actually believe some of your nonsense.

Of course there are terrible analogies... because you want them to be terrible. You are an *** and you always have to be right and if you are not you do this shit for 40 pages. Dude, go do something. Shouldn't you be working or are you milking that government clock.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

Of course there are terrible analogies... because you want them to be terrible. You are an *** and you always have to be right and if you are not you do this shit for 40 pages. Dude, go do something. Shouldn't you be working or are you milking that government clock.

He is trying to "sway" the conversation away from any and all political discussions (its what he does when things get heated).....because democrats look that bad right now, its getting more difficult to defend them

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

"Copy and paste" is useless unless you can understand it when someone asks more about what you pasted.
Just ask the guy who can't tell us the stoichiometric ratio he kept posting about earlier. He found a word and ran with it, but it buried him as soon as he was challenged.
Then, tell us more about a hollow concrete block with an electric blanket around it and how it could ever be compared to bones. Most ridiculous analogy yet.

Let's keep it simple. The word "innervation" means: "The word innervate sounds like what it is — it means to “put the nerves into” https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/innervate#:~:text=It's pronounced “inNERVate," accent,they innervate the muscle fiber.
INTO - A very important word in that definition. "INTO" means - "expressing movement or action with the result that someone or something becomes enclosed or surrounded by something else."
IN - Another important one here. "used as a function word to indicate inclusion, location, or position within limits - in the lake"....."to or toward the inside especially of a house or other building - come in"....." within a particular place" ("within" meaning "inside or not further than a particular area or space; "inside" meaning "the inner part; the interior").
The deeper you dig, the harder it is to actually avoid the fact that bones have nerves IN them.
They are not hollow tubes like a straw or a concrete block. They are far more like a tree or a tree branch.

But let's forget cinder blocks, electric blankets, even trees.
Let's stick to the body.

Do you think we have bones IN our body, or just "passing through" the "hollow" core that is our skin?
Do we have blood IN or veins and arteries, or just "passing through" the hollow tubes?
Is our brain IN our skull, or just "floating near" it?
Is our heart IN the chest area defined by the spine/ribcage/sternum, or just "passing through" it?
Is there marrow IN our bones, or just "passing through" a big hollow cavity of calcium?
Do we have masticated food IN our digestive tract, or just "passing through" it?
Do you put food IN your mouth, or does it just "pass through" on the way to "passing through" the digestive tract?
Do we have pulp IN our teeth, or is it just "passing through" them? Where do they put a filling? "Passing through"?
Do we have alveoli IN our lungs, or just passing through?
Is there bile IN our gallbladder, or is it just "passing through"?

Sorry kid, but there is absolutely nothing you will be able to do that will prove your belief there are no nerves in bones.
Regardless of how much the others here may hate me, they are all rolling their eyes at your posts, and thinking something like "STFU already. You are only making your situation WORSE by doubling and tripling down on something you clearly do NOT understand".

But I may be completely wrong about this basic fact of anatomy.
In fact, if anyone here wants to join you in your belief and they can provide the proof that you simply cannot, I will take a month off from posting.
Hell, if YOU can provide proof that bones do not have nerves in them, I will take a month off.
DEAL?


Another terrible analogy. The copper wire is wrapped around the OUTSIDE of the hollow former to make the voice coil.
If you want to use a speaker as your example, we can try that. Looking at these pictures, please tell me the location of the amplifier, the insulation, the wires, and each speaker driver when the box is complete and able to be used.
Be specific. WHERE are those things located.
View attachment 56876 View attachment 56877View attachment 56878






Sorry kid, but your memory is your downfall once again.
YOU are the guy who is claiming a monoblock amp with a terminal strip on the outside is "bridged internally".
Tell us all how I faked these snaps and you "never" said (and never continued to say) such nonsense.
View attachment 56879
View attachment 56880

View attachment 56881


Why does this stuff continue to come up? Because EVERY time you make yet another incorrect claim, try to tapdance away from being wrong, or flat-out lie, it throws you further down the hole of not being credible.
You already have no credibility as far as I'm concerned, but new people might not know how ridiculous you really are, and actually believe some of your nonsense.

Lol where in the **** did you find an isobaric parallel 6th order, nobody uses those. You're literally just arguing to argue bro, like I think you're just overlooking the point thx is making. It's just semantics or language choice. You're just arguing over minor differences in the way things are described, once again missing the forest for the trees, as you always do.

My IQ is doing a Columbia disaster having to read all of this garbage, and you'll do this with anyone lol. How many god damn more lost pages of threads are we gonna lose to you arguing about the same shit over and over and over? Holy hell bro, just stfu, for the love of all that's holy.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Lol where in the **** did you find an isobaric parallel 6th order, nobody uses those. You're literally just arguing to argue bro, like I think you're just overlooking the point thx is making. It's just semantics or language choice. You're just arguing over minor differences in the way things are described, once again missing the forest for the trees, as you always do.

My IQ is doing a Columbia disaster having to read all of this garbage, and you'll do this with anyone lol. How many god damn more lost pages of threads are we gonna lose to you arguing about the same shit over and over and over? Holy hell bro, just stfu, for the love of all that's holy.

Who cares where I found it? Whether it's used or not has ZERO relevance to the dummy telling us the location of the components in the pictures. Someone as enlightened as you CLAIM to be would get that.
FFS, you show us the same Terminator gif 4,000 times as if it has ANY relevance to your posts at all.

Reading the forum is too much for you? Then go back to reading about astral projection and how bigofft flew here in a pyramid.
OR you can accept the challenge for Thx. PROVE ON HIS BEHALF THAT BONES DO NOT HAVE NERVES IN THEM, AND I WILL TAKE A MONTH OFF FROM POSTING.

The enemy of your friend is your enemy.
No matter what you may beleive, find the proof that Thxone needs in order to get rid of me for a MOTNH

Deal?

He is trying to "sway" the conversation away from any and all political discussions (its what he does when things get heated).....because democrats look that bad right now, its getting more difficult to defend them

Sorry sport, but you're wrong. Post history on this and other threads will show that every time I present a fact to prove my point, someone will spin off on some tangent, or simply fall back on their personal beliefs to support their claims here.
For f*ck sake, how many times have I tried to steer the conversation back to getting people to prove the steel could not have melted in the WTC7 fire?
And there are STILL no valid explanations of the claim.

Why? Because people who claim bullsh*t like that CAN'T back it up with anyhting.
So they spin off on new tangents that they also CAN'T support. And on. And on.
It's a big circle jerk of conspiracy fantasy idiots.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The nervous system is its own organ, and there's multiple types of nerves that do different things, such as autonomic vs sensory vs motor; it's different functions. Your entire body is entwined with nerves, so it's more like bones are connected to the nervous system, as the bone is a separate organ system from the nerve itself, but there are nerves in bones, but bones themselves don't like make nerves. Bones form around nerves and blood vessels. Bones are kinda porous, and there's a new medical theory that bones themselves may just be really hard fascia (connective tissue). Idk, I actually know most of this because I'm sick, when it comes to connective tissues and nerves.

Here's a bone:

View attachment 56861
View attachment 56863

This is technical as f, and this convo is already full retard semantics, but nothing really has nerves, your nerves have whatever they're inside of, because the nerves program or read it, as your nervous system is your communications system between the whole body and its parts into a singularity, the brain, if you will. Bone cells as bone cells, nerve cells are nerve cells. There's nerves cells inside of bone cell structures, but they aren't the same type of cells.

I don't think it's all that technical. Everybody understands the body is made of different systems/structures. Almost everybody on planet earth would look at that picture say, " Certainly looks like there nerves in the bones." This stuff was covered in my HS biology class - ie, he skeletal portion of the nervous system regulates bone growth and red blood cell production.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Who cares where I found it? Whether it's used or not has ZERO relevance to the dummy telling us the location of the components in the pictures. Someone as enlightened as you CLAIM to be would get that.
FFS, you show us the same Terminator gif 4,000 times as if it has ANY relevance to your posts at all.

Reading the forum is too much for you? Then go back to reading about astral projection and how bigofft flew here in a pyramid.
OR you can accept the challenge for Thx. PROVE ON HIS BEHALF THAT BONES DO NOT HAVE NERVES IN THEM, AND I WILL TAKE A MONTH OFF FROM POSTING.

Deal?



Sorry sport, but you're wrong. Post history on this and other threads will show that every time I present a fact to prove my point, someone will spin off on some tangent, or simply fall back on their personal beliefs to support their claims here.
For f*ck sake, how many times have I tried to steer the conversation back to getting people to prove the steel could not have melted in the WTC7 fire?
And there are STILL no valid explanations of the claim.

Why? Because people who claim bullsh*t like that CAN'T back it up with anyhting.
So they spin off on new tangents that they also CAN'T support. And on. And on.
It's a big circle jerk of conspiracy fantasy idiots.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Go **** yourself. That is literally ALL you do. You are a stupid arrogant hypocrite beyond anyone else in this entire forum.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Go **** yourself

Annnddd, THERE is the usual right-wing response to being challenged to prove their bullshit.
I'm sure you'd offer to fight if that was possible for you.

ANYHTING to avoid using intellect and facts, right?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Annnddd, THERE is the usual right-wing response to being challenged to prove their bullshit.
I'm sure you'd offer to fight if that was possible for you.

ANYHTING to avoid using intellect and facts, right?

I'm not right wing, LOL. That's how stupid you are. You are some idiot left wing crusader who thinks everyone who doesn't agree with your politics is right wing or a conspiracy theorist or whatever.