What is?

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So, are you trying to do that same bullshit Rob does, where you don’t even look at the study they’re talking about?

If it's Epoch Times or ZeroHedge, I tend to ignore them.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

If it's Epoch Times or ZeroHedge, I tend to ignore them.

Well, you said you liked being average, right? Something like that.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Well, you said you liked being average, right? Something like that.

“Over time, Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial political content, including conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric advancing radical right, alt-right,and pro-Russia positions.”

Sorry, I’m not into bullshit, or pro-Russia anything.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

“Over time, Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial political content, including conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric advancing radical right, alt-right,and pro-Russia positions.”

Sorry, I’m not into bullshit, or pro-Russia anything.

“Pro-Russian”

“Call anyone you don’t like Pro-Russian.” -CIA memo to the mainstream media.

Oh, I’m sure whoever said that wasn’t a left leaning source. Why don’t you show us where you got that quote from?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Unreal:

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

“Pro-Russian”

“Call anyone you don’t like Pro-Russian.” -CIA memo to the mainstream media.

Oh, I’m sure whoever said that wasn’t a left leaning source. Why don’t you show us where you got that quote from?

Wiki. Far more credible than ZeroHedge.

“…provided details on the links between Krassimir Ivandjiiski (the site publisher's Bulgarian father), and Soviet-era activities in propaganda, revealed during litigation…”
“The officials said Zero Hedge, which has 1.2 million Twitter followers, published articles created by Moscow-controlled media that were then shared by outlets and people unaware of their nexus to Russian intelligence. “

“Bloomberg quoted former website staffer Colin Lokey as saying: "I can't be a 24-hour cheerleader for Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, and Trump anymore. It's wrong. Period. I know it gets you views now, but it will kill your brand over the long run. This isn't a revolution. It's a joke." Lokey told Bloomberg that he was pressured to frame issues in a way he felt was "disingenuous," summarizing its political stances as "Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry=dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft." Lokey provided chat transcripts in which Ivandjiiski refers to America's "silent majority" as "beastly", while Backshall acknowledges life in the U.S. is bad "outside of my bubble". Wallace-Wells observed that the site demonstrated a pro-Russia bias, stating the site had a "pointed" Russophilia

But of course, it’s all just left-wing lies to make ZeroHedge look bad.
How much do they pay you to post links and drive traffic to their site?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Credible = Any source that supports left leaning views

Not Credible = Any source that shares more views than the "Credible" source.

Prove me wrong.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Well, you said you liked being average, right? Something like that.

Have you ever read Epoch Times? Hardly worth the time. I think about 1/2 ZeroHedge's stuff is just reprints of Epoch Times articles.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Credible = Any source that supports left leaning views

Not Credible = Any source that shares more views than the "Credible" source.

Prove me wrong.

“credible - that can be believed or trusted”

There. You’re wrong.
That was easy. As usual.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Wiki. Far more credible than ZeroHedge.

“…provided details on the links between Krassimir Ivandjiiski (the site publisher's Bulgarian father), and Soviet-era activities in propaganda, revealed during litigation…”
“The officials said Zero Hedge, which has 1.2 million Twitter followers, published articles created by Moscow-controlled media that were then shared by outlets and people unaware of their nexus to Russian intelligence. “

“Bloomberg quoted former website staffer Colin Lokey as saying: "I can't be a 24-hour cheerleader for Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, and Trump anymore. It's wrong. Period. I know it gets you views now, but it will kill your brand over the long run. This isn't a revolution. It's a joke." Lokey told Bloomberg that he was pressured to frame issues in a way he felt was "disingenuous," summarizing its political stances as "Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry=dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft." Lokey provided chat transcripts in which Ivandjiiski refers to America's "silent majority" as "beastly", while Backshall acknowledges life in the U.S. is bad "outside of my bubble". Wallace-Wells observed that the site demonstrated a pro-Russia bias, stating the site had a "pointed" Russophilia

But of course, it’s all just left-wing lies to make ZeroHedge look bad.
How much do they pay you to post links and drive traffic to their site?

Disgruntled employees always share the truth. Lol, my feelings say it's this way. Zerohedge being a "cheerleader" for "Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing and Trump" is just trashing the company. It's absolutely laughable that he would frame that in that light. You're just idiotically quoting something someone said without even knowing the site.

You share bullshit that's tied to American Intelligence without knowing it, FYI, and some of it is just absolute state-sponsored propaganda. And just because something is published by a Russian news outlet, doesn't mean it's false. You have to know enough to know what's BS and what's not. Bloomberg itself has cheerleaded many bullshit state-proganda narratives created by the likes of the CIA and crowd. Your argument is not solid.

Have you ever read Epoch Times? Hardly worth the time. I think about 1/2 ZeroHedge's stuff is just reprints of Epoch Times articles.

Yes, I have, and that's your opinion, which you're entitled to.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Disgruntled employees always share the truth. Lol, my feelings say it's this way. Zerohedge being a "cheerleader" for "Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing and Trump" is just trashing the company. It's absolutely laughable that he would frame that in that light. You're just idiotically quoting something someone said without even knowing the site.

You share bullshit that's tied to American Intelligence without knowing it, FYI, and some of it is just absolute state-sponsored propaganda. And just because something is published by a Russian news outlet, doesn't mean it's false. You have to know enough to know what's BS and what's not. Bloomberg itself has cheerleaded many bullshit state-proganda narratives created by the likes of the CIA and crowd. Your argument is not solid.


Yes, I have, and that's your opinion, which you're entitled to.

Uhmmm the “disgruntled employee” shared transcripts of the orders from headquarters.

And the link between then and pro-Russia activity was acknowledged in litigation.

Lemme guess, the judge was anti-ZeroHedge, and just wanted them to look bad?

It’s funny, you’ll believe ANYTHING from ANY source that supports all of your anti-vax nonsense, but won’t even believe litigation that shows ZeroHedge is pro-Russia.
You even directly disregard the family ties between the owner and his father, yet fully believe Biden is a pedo and criminal because his non-politician son is a fvckup.

You’re more transparent every day.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Uhmmm the “disgruntled employee” shared transcripts of the orders from headquarters.

And the link between then and pro-Russia activity was acknowledged in litigation.

Which you showed none of, nor did you show your source. Why do rarely show your sources? You ask for proof all of the time, you massive hypocrite. You can't convince anybody of anything operating like that.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“credible - that can be believed or trusted”

There. You’re wrong.
That was easy. As usual.

A far cry from successful Rob.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“credible - that can be believed or trusted”

There. You’re wrong.
That was easy. As usual.

Well I guess there are many credible sources then because according to your post they just need to be believed or trusted. No stipulation by whom. So I guess any source that the right, conservatives, or Trump supporters trust or believe is in fact credible. Thanks Rob.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Well I guess there are many credible sources then because according to your post they just need to be believed or trusted. No stipulation by whom. So I guess any source that the right, conservatives, or Trump supporters trust or believe is in fact credible. Thanks Rob.

You know better than that...only Rob approved messages are credible...